Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLM-Pilot: Characterize and Optimize Performance of your LLM Inference Services

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02425 v1 pith:6SM7OKBV submitted 2024-10-03 cs.DC cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.DCcs.CLcs.LG
keywords performanceinferencellm-pilotserviceshardwarerequirementsdeliverservice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly growing in popularity, LLM inference services must be able to serve requests from thousands of users while satisfying performance requirements. The performance of an LLM inference service is largely determined by the hardware onto which it is deployed, but understanding of which hardware will deliver on performance requirements remains challenging. In this work we present LLM-Pilot - a first-of-its-kind system for characterizing and predicting performance of LLM inference services. LLM-Pilot performs benchmarking of LLM inference services, under a realistic workload, across a variety of GPUs, and optimizes the service configuration for each considered GPU to maximize performance. Finally, using this characterization data, LLM-Pilot learns a predictive model, which can be used to recommend the most cost-effective hardware for a previously unseen LLM. Compared to existing methods, LLM-Pilot can deliver on performance requirements 33% more frequently, whilst reducing costs by 60% on average.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Think Before You Grid-Search: Floor-First Triage for LLM Serving

    cs.PF 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM serving should triage by five-resource analytical floors and wall ordering, not grid search; on 16×H20, TP16 is capacity-capped at ~70 while EP+DP attention reaches ~644 concurrent 8K requests.

  2. An Empirical Characterization of Outages and Incidents in Public Services for Large Language Models

    cs.PF 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Public LLM services show distinct failure patterns: ChatGPT outages last longer but happen less often than Claude, failures follow weekly and monthly rhythms, and OpenAI isolates failures across services better than A...

Pith tools