REVIEW 3 cited by
NLVR2 Visual Bias Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
NLVR2 (Suhr et al., 2019) was designed to be robust for language bias through a data collection process that resulted in each natural language sentence appearing with both true and false labels. The process did not provide a similar measure of control for visual bias. This technical report analyzes the potential for visual bias in NLVR2. We show that some amount of visual bias likely exists. Finally, we identify a subset of the test data that allows to test for model performance in a way that is robust to such potential biases. We show that the performance of existing models (Li et al., 2019; Tan and Bansal 2019) is relatively robust to this potential bias. We propose to add the evaluation on this subset of the data to the NLVR2 evaluation protocol, and update the official release to include it. A notebook including an implementation of the code used to replicate this analysis is available at http://nlvr.ai/NLVR2BiasAnalysis.html.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Evaluating MLLMs with Multimodal Multi-image Reasoning Benchmark
MMRB is the first benchmark combining multi-image inputs with chain-of-thought reasoning annotations, and its evaluation shows open-source MLLMs trail commercial models while multi-image reward models are unstable.
-
LaCo: Efficient Layer-wise Compression of Visual Tokens for Multimodal Large Language Models
Inserting a pixel-shuffle plus residual patch-merge layer inside the vision encoder compresses visual tokens more efficiently than post-encoder compression, at modest accuracy cost.
-
Analyze-Prompt-Reason: A Collaborative Agent-Based Framework for Multi-Image Vision-Language Reasoning
A prompt-engineered Claude 3.7, guided by GPT-4o-generated prompts and few-shot examples, reaches near-ceiling accuracy on most of the 18 MIRAGE multi-image reasoning tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.