REVIEW 2 cited by
Large Linguistic Models: Investigating LLMs' metalinguistic abilities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The performance of large language models (LLMs) has recently improved to the point where models can perform well on many language tasks. We show here that--for the first time--the models can also generate valid metalinguistic analyses of language data. We outline a research program where the behavioral interpretability of LLMs on these tasks is tested via prompting. LLMs are trained primarily on text--as such, evaluating their metalinguistic abilities improves our understanding of their general capabilities and sheds new light on theoretical models in linguistics. We show that OpenAI's (2024) o1 vastly outperforms other models on tasks involving drawing syntactic trees and phonological generalization. We speculate that OpenAI o1's unique advantage over other models may result from the model's chain-of-thought mechanism, which mimics the structure of human reasoning used in complex cognitive tasks, such as linguistic analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Length Representations in Large Language Models
Output length in LLMs is encoded in early attention-layer units, and scaling those units changes generated summary length while largely preserving content.
-
Can LLMs Help Create Grammar?: Automating Grammar Creation for Endangered Languages with In-Context Learning
With only a dictionary and parallel sentences, GPT-4o-mini generated XLE grammar rules and mostly accurate lexical entries for Moklen, though the evaluation is not independently verified.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.