Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Light preserves moiré periodicity while melting the charge order amplitude in EuTe4.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 16:03 UTC pith:77IYTUEY

load-bearing objection First look at JC-CDW dynamics with a useful two-harmonic decomposition, solid qualitative results, but the quantitative amplitude/phase split rests on model assumptions that need tightening. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.16493 v3 pith:77IYTUEY submitted 2025-09-20 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dynamics of a jointly commensurate moir\'e charge density wave

Kyoung Hun Oh , Yifan Su , Honglie Ning , B. Q. Lv , Alfred Zong , Dong Wu , Qiaomei Liu , Gyeongbo Kang
show 18 more authors
Hyeongi Choi Hyun-Woo J. Kim Seunghyeok Ha Jaehwon Kim Suchismita Sarker Jacob P. C. Ruff Xiaozhe Shen Duan Luo Stephen Weathersby Patrick Kramer Xinxin Cheng Dongsung Choi Doron Azoury Masataka Mogi B. J. Kim N. L. Wang Hoyoung Jang Nuh Gedik
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords charge density wavemoiré superstructurejointly commensurate CDWultrafast dynamicstime-resolved X-ray diffractionultrafast electron diffractiontopological defectsphase fluctuations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first ultrafast study of a jointly commensurate charge density wave (JC-CDW), a moiré superstructure formed when two CDWs with slightly mismatched wavevectors satisfy a commensuration condition. Using time-resolved X-ray diffraction, photoemission, and electron diffraction on EuTe4, it shows that strong light pulses leave the CDW wavevector locked and the coherence length along the wavevector unchanged, so the moiré periodicity survives while the CDW amplitude is transiently suppressed. The correlation length shrinks exclusively in the perpendicular in-plane direction, signaling the formation of shear-type topological defects rather than the isotropic dislocations seen in ordinary incommensurate CDWs. The paper also introduces a two-peak intensity analysis that separates the fast (~1 ps) amplitude quenching from the slower (~5 ps) growth of phase fluctuations, and it cross-validates this decomposition with complementary probes. If correct, these findings show that moiré potential depth can be optically suppressed without altering moiré periodicity, and they establish a method for tracking amplitude and phase dynamics separately in CDW systems.

Core claim

The central claim is that a jointly commensurate CDW responds to photoexcitation by preserving its wavevector and hence its moiré periodicity, while the amplitude of the order is quenched on a sub-picosecond timescale and phase fluctuations grow on a much slower timescale. In EuTe4, the monolayer CDW wavevector q=(0,0.644,0) and bilayer CDW wavevector q'=(0,0.678,0.5) satisfy q+2q'=(0,2,1), locking the two orders together. Under excitation up to 4 mJ/cm^2, the diffraction peak positions and widths along the wavevector direction remain unchanged, demonstrating that the joint commensuration persists out of equilibrium. The peak width along the perpendicular in-plane direction increases linearl

What carries the argument

The jointly commensurate CDW condition, q + 2q' = (0,2,1), imposes wavevector locking between the two incommensurate CDWs and defines the ~13.6 nm moiré periodicity. The analysis of amplitude versus phase fluctuations uses the intensity relations I1 ~ A^2 e^{-Δφ^2/2} and I2 ~ (A^2+γA)^2 e^{-2Δφ^2} for the first- and second-order satellites, where γ is a constant set by the CDW wavevector and shape; these two equations are solved for A(t) and Δφ^2(t) from the measured time-dependent intensities. The formation of shear-type defects is diagnosed by tracking the H-direction peak width in ultrafast electron diffraction, which shows exclusive broadening perpendicular to the CDW wavevector.

Load-bearing premise

The decomposition assumes that the first- and second-order satellite intensities follow the exact model forms I1 ~ A^2 e^{-Δφ^2/2} and I2 ~ (A^2+γA)^2 e^{-2Δφ^2} with a constant, wavevector-dependent coefficient γ, even under strong photoexcitation; if γ shifts or higher-order correlation terms contribute, the extracted A(t) and Δφ^2(t) are biased.

What would settle it

Perform time-resolved diffraction and time-resolved ARPES on the same sample, at the same pump fluence and temporal resolution, and compare the CDW gap dynamics to the A(t) extracted from the two-peak method; any quantitative discrepancy beyond the stated uncertainty would show the model relations or the constancy of γ are wrong. Also, a direct measurement of the time-dependent second-order peak shape could reveal whether higher-order correlation effects alter the assumed intensity scaling.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, the moiré potential depth in a JC-CDW can be transiently suppressed without changing its period, offering a new handle for optically engineering moiré electronic landscapes.
  • Shear-type topological defects appear as a distinct, anisotropic channel for CDW phase decoherence, with a defect density tunable by pump fluence rather than by altering the wavevector.
  • The two-peak intensity method can be applied to other CDW materials with detectable second-order satellites to separate amplitude and phase dynamics in a single experiment.
  • The persistence of wavevector locking under strong excitation suggests JC-CDW order is closer in robustness to commensurate CDWs than to typical incommensurate CDWs, which would revise expectations for light control in such systems.
  • The distinct timescales of amplitude recovery and phase-fluctuation growth imply that amplitude and phase degrees of freedom decouple during the transient response, which is relevant for models of CDW phase transitions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to search for similar anisotropic peak broadening in other JC-CDW or multi-CDW materials; if found, shear-type defect formation may be a generic consequence of wavevector locking under photoexcitation.
  • The selective suppression of moiré potential depth without changing periodicity could be exploited in non-volatile optical memory: light would write a transiently weakened potential that might be stabilized through defect pinning, leaving the period as a robust readout.
  • The two-peak decomposition method, if validated in other systems, could be adapted to separate amplitude and phase dynamics in other ordered phases with multiple diffraction harmonics, such as spin density waves or superconducting stripes.
  • The paper's qualitative check of phase fluctuations via peak-width broadening suggests that phase fluctuations and phase decoherence are linked in EuTe4; testing this correlation in other CDWs would clarify whether it is universal or material-specific.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a multi-modal ultrafast study (tr-XRD, tr-ARPES, UED) of the jointly commensurate charge density wave (JC-CDW) in EuTe4. The main claims are: (1) under strong photoexcitation, the CDW wavevectors q and q' remain locked so the moiré periodicity is preserved; (2) the CDW correlation length is reduced exclusively perpendicular to the wavevector, which the authors interpret as the formation of shear-type topological defects; (3) by tracking the first- and second-order satellite intensities, the authors separate the CDW amplitude A(t) from phase fluctuations Δφ²(t), finding that amplitude is rapidly quenched and recovers within ~6 ps while phase fluctuations grow more slowly and persist; and (4) this amplitude suppression with preserved periodicity implies a transient reduction of the moiré potential depth. The quantitative amplitude/phase separation relies on model relations I1 ~ A²e^{-Δφ²/2} and I2 ~ (A²+γA)²e^{-2Δφ²} with a constant shape parameter γ.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper is significant: it provides the first time-resolved view of a jointly commensurate moiré CDW, identifies a new anisotropic topological-defect channel (shear-type defects) that is distinct from the isotropic dislocation defects in conventional CDWs, and introduces a two-satellite-peak method that could be useful for other CDW systems. The wavevector-locking and anisotropic-broadening observations are supported by complementary X-ray and electron diffraction and are directly presented, which is a strength. The paper is, however, less than fully convincing on the quantitative separation of amplitude and phase, because that separation depends on a constant-γ model and on the interpretation of fixed-momentum avalanche-photodiode intensities as the modeled intensities, while the UED data show that the peak shape itself changes in time. The qualitative multi-probe agreement is a genuine asset, but it does not constitute a quantitative validation at matched fluence and sample conditions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text (amplitude/phase decomposition) and Methods (tr-XRD)] The extraction of A(t) and Δφ²(t) from I1 and I2 via I1 ~ A²e^{-Δφ²/2} and I2 ~ (A²+γA)²e^{-2Δφ²} assumes, as stated, that the intensities are those of the modeled diffraction peaks with a constant γ. However, the tr-XRD signal was recorded with an avalanche photodiode at a fixed momentum (Methods), i.e., as a peak-height rather than integrated-intensity measurement. The UED data in Fig. 2g,i show that the q-peak broadens along H with an increase in FWHM at 2.5–4 mJ/cm². For a fixed-momentum measurement, this broadening reduces the recorded intensity independently of A and Δφ². No correction or estimate of this linewidth contribution to I1(t) and I2(t) is presented in the main text. With only two intensities and three effects (A, Δφ², and linewidth broadening), the separation is underdetermined unless Supplementary Note 4 explicitly addresses the broadening and validates the constancy of
  2. [Figure 3g,h and validation paragraphs] The independent checks of the amplitude/phase decomposition are qualitative and are performed at different conditions from the tr-XRD decomposition. The tr-ARPES measurement uses 0.8 mJ/cm², the UED measurement uses 2.5 mJ/cm², while the tr-XRD decomposition is shown at 4 mJ/cm² (and 1 mJ/cm² for raw intensities). Moreover, tr-ARPES measures in-gap spectral weight, not the CDW amplitude directly, and UED measures peak-width broadening (phase decoherence), not Δφ²(t); the text itself notes these quantities are not necessarily proportional. The qualitative agreement establishes that two distinct timescales exist, but it does not validate the exact functional separation or the absolute magnitudes of A(t) and Δφ²(t). To support the quantitative claim, the authors should provide matched-fluence comparisons or explicit modeling of the fluence dependence and of the relation between the observab
  3. [Figure 2g–k and shear-defect interpretation] The exclusive broadening of the monolayer CDW peak along H is taken as evidence for shear-type topological defects. This is a plausible interpretation, but it is not unique. An anisotropic Debye-Waller factor or a transient anisotropic lattice strain could also produce a larger width change along H than along K. The paper mentions that Bragg peaks show slower temperature-like dynamics (Supplementary Note 5) but does not compare the H vs K width dynamics of a structural Bragg peak with the CDW peak dynamics. Please provide a quantitative check—e.g., the time-resolved width anisotropy of an adjacent structural Bragg peak, or a model of anisotropic strain broadening—to distinguish shear-type defect formation from other sources of anisotropic broadening.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 3e,f] No propagated uncertainties are shown for the extracted A(t) and Δφ²(t). Since these quantities are obtained by inverting two noisy intensities, error bars or confidence intervals should be provided.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] Typo: 'botton' should be 'bottom'.
  3. [Main text, I2 expression] The shape parameter γ enters as (A²+γA)², but its definition, units, and numerical value are only given in Supplementary Note 4. A brief definition in the main text would help the reader evaluate the decomposition.
  4. [Fig. 3g,h and text] The phrase 'smoking-gun evidence' is overstated; the evidence for distinct amplitude/phase timescales is indirect and model-dependent, as acknowledged elsewhere in the paper.
  5. [Fig. 2g] Only two time delays are shown for the H-linewidth broadening (-5 ps and 4 ps). Showing intermediate delays would substantiate the monotonic broadening and the connection to Fig. 3f.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the amplitude/phase extraction is a fixed-parameter inversion checked by independent probes, and self-citations are corroborated by in-paper static diffraction.

full rationale

The central quantitative step is the extraction of A(t) and Δφ²(t) from the two measured satellite intensities I1(t) and I2(t) using I1 ∼ A² e^{−Δφ²/2} and I2 ∼ (A²+γA)² e^{−2Δφ²} (Supplementary Note 4). This is a deterministic inversion of two measured time traces with a constant γ determined by the equilibrium CDW wavevector and shape, not a parameter fitted to the dynamics, so the extracted amplitude and phase are not equal to the model's inputs by construction. The decomposition is further checked against tr-ARPES in-gap spectral weight (amplitude) and UED H-linewidth broadening (phase coherence), which are independent measurements at different fluences; while those checks are partly qualitative, they do not reduce the central claim to the model's own assumptions. The JC-CDW assignment and monolayer/bilayer CDW identification cite prior work by overlapping authors (refs [4], [9], [25]), but the present static XRD independently shows q+2q'=(0 2 1), so those self-citations are corroborating rather than load-bearing. The possible time-dependence of γ or the use of peak-height rather than integrated tr-XRD intensity is a model-validation risk, not a circularity, because the paper does not fit γ to the dynamics or define the output in terms of the input. Overall, the derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks; no circular step was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard scattering theory and prior characterization of EuTe4. No new particles or forces are introduced. The main unverified input is the shape parameter γ, whose derivation is not shown in the main text.

free parameters (1)
  • γ (CDW shape parameter)
    Appears in the relation I2 ~ (A^2+γA)^2 e^{-2Δφ^2}. Stated to be determined by the CDW wavevector and shape, but its value and derivation are relegated to Supplementary Note 4. If fitted to the data rather than computed from the CDW form factor, the amplitude/phase decomposition becomes partially circular.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Two coexisting CDWs with wavevectors q=(0 0.644 0) and q'=(0 0.678 0.5) form a JC-CDW in EuTe4 with q+2q'=(0 2 1).
    Taken from prior work (refs 4,9,10); the present paper confirms the peaks but relies on prior identification of the two CDW orders.
  • standard math The first- and second-order satellite peak intensities follow I1 ~ A^2 e^{-Δφ^2/2} and I2 ~ (A^2+γA)^2 e^{-2Δφ^2}.
    Based on Overhauser's CDW scattering model extended to harmonics; used to invert A(t) and Δφ^2(t). Assumes the form holds in the excited state.
  • domain assumption The CDW gap (in-gap spectral weight) is proportional to CDW amplitude.
    Standard for CDW systems; used to validate the amplitude dynamics via tr-ARPES.
  • domain assumption Diffraction peak width is inversely proportional to CDW coherence length, and H-direction broadening specifically indicates shear-type phase slips.
    Standard interpretation, but the anisotropic separation relies on different probes (tr-XRD for K, UED for H) on different specimens.
  • domain assumption Bragg peak dynamics are dominated by thermal Debye-Waller effect, not by CDW order changes.
    Used to separate lattice heating from CDW dynamics (Supplementary Note 5).

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamics of a jointly commensurate moir\'e charge density wave." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/77IYTUEY

@misc{pith2026250916493,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamics of a jointly commensurate moir\'e charge density wave},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/77IYTUEY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.16493}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The advent of two-dimensional moir\'e systems has revolutionized the exploration of phenomena arising from strong correlations and nontrivial band topology. Recently, a moir\'e superstructure formed by two coexisting charge density waves (CDWs) with slightly mismatched wavevectors has been realized. These incommensurate CDWs can collectively exhibit commensurability, resulting in the jointly commensurate CDW (JC-CDW) and establishing a new paradigm for controlling moir\'e potential and periodicity. Achieving such functionality, however, hinges on a key open question: how do the amplitude, phase coherence, and periodicity of this order respond to external perturbations? Here, we address this question using a suite of time- and momentum-resolved diffraction and spectroscopic techniques to probe light-induced CDW dynamics in EuTe$_4$. Our time-resolved diffraction measurements distinguish the instantaneous quenching of the JC-CDW amplitude, as verified by time-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, from the much slower evolution of phase fluctuations. Furthermore, while the JC-CDW wavevector remains locked along the CDW direction upon photoexcitation, indicating a preserved moir\'e periodicity, the correlation length of JC-CDW shows an exclusive reduction perpendicular to its wavevector, unveiling the formation of previously unexplored shear-type defects. Together, this multimodal methodology reconstructs the spatiotemporal evolution of the JC-CDW upon excitation. These findings not only highlight the remarkable robustness of JC-CDWs out of equilibrium, but also provide insight into optical manipulation and engineering of moir\'e quantum materials through defect control.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.16493 by Alfred Zong, B. J. Kim, B. Q. Lv, Dongsung Choi, Dong Wu, Doron Azoury, Duan Luo, Gyeongbo Kang, Honglie Ning, Hoyoung Jang, Hyeongi Choi, Hyun-Woo J. Kim, Jacob P. C. Ruff, Jaehwon Kim, Kyoung Hun Oh, Masataka Mogi, N. L. Wang, Nuh Gedik, Patrick Kramer, Qiaomei Liu, Seunghyeok Ha, Stephen Weathersby, Suchismita Sarker, Xiaozhe Shen, Xinxin Cheng, Yifan Su.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Jointly commensurate charge density wave and static diffraction data a Schematics of a commensurate CDW (top panel) and jointly commensurate CDWs (botton panel). Spheres represent the structural lattice and lines represent the charge density distribution. b Equilibrium XRD pattern in (2 K L) plane. Red, blue, and gold arrows highlight the q, 2q and q ′ CDW peaks, respectively. I denotes the X-ray scatterin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Light-induced changes in the CDW diffraction peak widths and positions a K-cut of the q peak at (0 -0.644 1) taken at t= -2 ps (black) and 0.5 ps (purple) with F = 4 mJ/cm2 from tr-XRD. Lines are fits to Lorentzians. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the fit. b Normalized position (qK) and c width (σK) defined as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the q peak, taken at 0.5 ps. Shaded lines… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Temporal evolution of the CDW diffraction intensities. a-b Schematics of a am￾plitude and b phase modulations in a CDW system. c Temporal evolution of the intensity I1 with pump fluences F = 1 and 4 mJ/cm2 of the CDW peak at G ± q=(0 -0.644 1) normalized by its equilibrium value. Lines are fits to an exponential decay. d Temporal evolution of the intensity I2 with pump fluences F = 1 and 4 mJ/cm2 of the CD… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Physical picture of the CDW dynamics illustrating the disentangled amplitude and phase evolution together with the formation of shear-type defects. Schematics of the temporal evolution of the first- and second- order monolayer CDW peaks in momentum space and the corresponding real-space structure, at a,b t < 0 ps, c,d t = 1 ps, e,f t = 4 ps, and g,h t = 12 ps. Red (blue) lines represent the line cuts of th… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $R^2$-dLLM: Accelerating Diffusion Large Language Models via Spatio-Temporal Redundancy Reduction

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    R²-dLLM reduces dLLM decoding steps by up to 75% via spatio-temporal redundancy reduction while keeping generation quality competitive.

  2. Room-temperature multistage metastability in a moir\'e superstructure

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Electrically switchable room-temperature multistage metastable states in EuTe4 arise from out-of-plane CDW phase switching in its moiré superstructure, enabling potential multi-bit nonvolatile memory.

  3. $R^2$-dLLM: Accelerating Diffusion Large Language Models via Spatio-Temporal Redundancy Reduction

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Voltage pulses create nonvolatile, multi-state metastable CDW phases in bulk EuTe4 at room temperature via out-of-plane phase switching in its moiré superstructure.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Y.Cao, V.Fatemi, S.Fang, K.Watanabe, T.Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras,andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Un- conventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    K.F.MakandJ.Shan,Semiconductormoirématerials,NatureNanotechnology17,686(2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    B. Q. Lv, Y. Su, A. Zong, Q. Liu, D. Wu, N. F. Q. Yuan, Z. Nie, J. Li, S. Sarker, S. Meng, J.P.C.Ruff, N.L.Wang,andN.Gedik,Largemoirésuperstructureofstackedincommensurate charge density waves, arXiv:2501.09715 (2025), arXiv:2501.09715

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    V. J. Emery and D. Mukamel, Locking of the two charge-density waves in NbSe3, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics12, L677 (1979)

    1979

  6. [6]

    P. A. Lee and T. M. Rice, Electric field depinning of charge density waves, Physical Review B 19, 3970 (1979)

    1979

  7. [7]

    Bruinsma and S

    R. Bruinsma and S. E. Trullinger, Phase-locked charge-density waves in NbSe3, Physical Re- view B22, 4543 (1980)

    1980

  8. [8]

    Ayari, R

    A. Ayari, R. Danneau, H. Requardt, L. Ortega, J. E. Lorenzo, P. Monceau, R. Currat, S. Bra- zovskii, and G. Grübel, Sliding-induced decoupling and charge transfer between the coexist- ing Q1 and Q2 charge density waves in NbSe3, Physical Review Letters93, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.93.106404 (2004)

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2004

  9. [9]

    B. Lv, A. Zong, D. Wu, A. Rozhkov, B. V. Fine, S.-D. Chen, M. Hashimoto, D.-H. Lu, M. Li, Y.-B. Huang, J. P. Ruff, D. A. Walko, Z. Chen, I. Hwang, Y. Su, X. Shen, X. Wang, F. Han, H. C. Po, Y. Wang, P. Jarillo-Herrero, X. Wang, H. Zhou, C.-J. Sun, H. Wen, Z.-X. Shen, N. Wang, and N. Gedik, Unconventional Hysteretic Transition in a Charge Density Wave, Phy...

    2022

  10. [10]

    D. Wu, Q. M. Liu, S. L. Chen, G. Y. Zhong, J. Su, L. Y. Shi, L. Tong, G. Xu, P. Gao, and N. L. Wang, Layered semiconductor EuTe4 with charge density wave order in square tellurium sheets, Physical Review Materials3, 024002 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Q. Liu, D. Wu, T. Wu, S. Han, Y. Peng, Z. Yuan, Y. Cheng, B. Li, T. Hu, L. Yue, S. Xu, R. Ding, M. Lu, R. Li, S. Zhang, B. Lv, A. Zong, Y. Su, N. Gedik, Z. Yin, T. Dong, and 15 N. Wang, Room-temperature non-volatile optical manipulation of polar order in a charge density wave, Nature Communications15, 8937 (2024), 2310.10293

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Venturini, M

    R. Venturini, M. Rupnik, J. Gašperlin, J. Lipič, P. Šutar, Y. Vaskivskyi, F. Ščepanović, D. Grabnar, D. Golež, and D. Mihailovic, Electrically driven non-volatile resistance switch- ing between charge density wave states at room temperature, arXiv:2412.13094 (2024), arXiv:2412.13094

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    A. Zong, X. Shen, A. Kogar, L. Ye, C. Marks, D. Chowdhury, T. Rohwer, B. Freelon, S. Weath- ersby, R. Li, J. Yang, J. Checkelsky, X. Wang, and N. Gedik, Ultrafast manipulation of mirror domain walls in a charge density wave, Science Advances4, eaau5501 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    A. K. Geremew, S. Rumyantsev, F. Kargar, B. Debnath, A. Nosek, M. A. Bloodgood, M. Bock- rath, T. T. Salguero, R. K. Lake, and A. A. Balandin, Bias-Voltage Driven Switching of the Charge-Density-Wave and Normal Metallic Phases in 1T-TaS2 Thin-Film Devices, ACS Nano 13, 7231 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    A. Zong, A. Kogar, Y. Q. Bie, T. Rohwer, C. Lee, E. Baldini, E. Ergeçen, M. B. Yilmaz, B. Freelon, E. J. Sie, H. Zhou, J. Straquadine, P. Walmsley, P. E. Dolgirev, A. V. Rozhkov, I. R. Fisher, P. Jarillo-Herrero, B. V. Fine, and N. Gedik, Evidence for topological defects in a photoinduced phase transition, Nature Physics15, 27 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Kogar, A

    A. Kogar, A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, X. Shen, J. Straquadine, Y. Q. Bie, X. Wang, T. Rohwer, I. C. Tung, Y. Yang, R. Li, J. Yang, S. Weathersby, S. Park, M. E. Kozina, E. J. Sie, H. Wen, P. Jarillo-Herrero, I. R. Fisher, X. Wang, and N. Gedik, Light-induced charge density wave in LaTe3, Nature Physics16, 159 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, A. Kogar, Y. Su, X. Shen, J. A. W. Straquadine, X. Wang, D. Luo, M. E. Kozina, A. H. Reid, R. Li, J. Yang, S. P. Weathersby, S. Park, E. J. Sie, P. Jarillo- Herrero, I. R. Fisher, X. Wang, E. Demler, and N. Gedik, Role of Equilibrium Fluctuations in Light-Induced Order, Physical Review Letters127, 227401 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Cheng, A

    Y. Cheng, A. Zong, L. Wu, Q. Meng, W. Xia, F. Qi, P. Zhu, X. Zou, T. Jiang, Y. Guo, J. van Wezel, A. Kogar, M. W. Zuerch, J. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and D. Xiang, Ultrafast formation of topological defects in a two-dimensional charge density wave, Nature Physics20, 54 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Ravnik, I

    J. Ravnik, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, and D. Mihailovic, Real-time observation of the coherent transition to a metastable emergent state in 1T-TaS2, Physical Review B97, 1 (2018). 16

    2018

  20. [20]

    Vaskivskyi, J

    I. Vaskivskyi, J. Gospodaric, S. Brazovskii, D. Svetin, P. Sutar, E. Goreshnik, I. A. Mihailovic, T. Mertelj, and D. Mihailovic, Controlling the metal-to-insulator relaxation of the metastable hidden quantum state in 1T-TaS2, Science Advances1, 10.1126/sciadv.1500168 (2015)

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500168 2015

  21. [21]

    Mihailovic, The importance of topological defects in photoexcited phase transitions includ- ing memory applications, Applied Sciences (Switzerland)9, 10.3390/app9050890 (2019)

    D. Mihailovic, The importance of topological defects in photoexcited phase transitions includ- ing memory applications, Applied Sciences (Switzerland)9, 10.3390/app9050890 (2019)

    work page doi:10.3390/app9050890 2019

  22. [22]

    Cheng, A

    Y. Cheng, A. Zong, J. Li, W. Xia, S. Duan, W. Zhao, Y. Li, F. Qi, J. Wu, L. Zhao, P. Zhu, X. Zou, T. Jiang, Y. Guo, L. Yang, D. Qian, W. Zhang, A. Kogar, M. W. Zuerch, D. Xiang, and J. Zhang, Light-induced dimension crossover dictated by excitonic correlations, Nature Communications13, 963 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    H.Ning, K.H.Oh, Y.Su, A.vonHoegen, Z.Porter, A.CapaSalinas, Q.L.Nguyen, M.Chollet, T. Sato, V. Esposito, M. C. Hoffmann, A. White, C. Melendrez, D. Zhu, S. D. Wilson, and N. Gedik, Dynamical decoding of the competition between charge density waves in a kagome superconductor, Nature Communications15, 7286 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Y. Su, B. Q. Lv, A. Zong, A. Müller, S. Chattopadhyay, P. E. Dolgirev, A. G. Singh, J. A. W. Straquadine, D. Choi, D. Azoury, M. Mogi, I. R. Fisher, E. Demler, and N. Gedik, Time- domainidentificationofdistinctmechanismsforcompetingchargedensitywavesinarare-earth tritelluride, arXiv:2503.13936 (2025), arXiv:2503.13936

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    B. Lv, A. Zong, D. Wu, Z. Nie, Y. Su, D. Choi, B. Ilyas, B. T. Fichera, J. Li, E. Baldini, M. Mogi, Y.-B. Huang, H. C. Po, S. Meng, Y. Wang, N. Wang, and N. Gedik, Coexistence of Interacting Charge Density Waves in a Layered Semiconductor, Physical Review Letters132, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Rathore, A

    R. Rathore, A. Pathak, M. K. Gupta, R. Mittal, R. Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, H. Singhal, A. H. Said, and D. Bansal, Evolution of static charge density wave order, amplitude mode dynamics, and suppression of Kohn anomalies at the hysteretic transition in EuTe4, Physical Review B107, 024101 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Rischel, A

    C. Rischel, A. Rousse, I. Uschmann, P.-A. Albouy, J.-P. Geindre, P. Audebert, J.-C. Gauthier, E. Fröster, J.-L. Martin, and A. Antonetti, Femtosecond time-resolved X-ray diffraction from laser-heated organic films, Nature390, 490 (1997)

    1997

  28. [28]

    Beaud, A

    P. Beaud, A. Caviezel, S. O. Mariager, L. Rettig, G. Ingold, C. Dornes, S. W. Huang, J. A. Johnson, M. Radovic, T. Huber, T. Kubacka, A. Ferrer, H. T. Lemke, M. Chollet, D. Zhu, J. M. Glownia, M. Sikorski, A. Robert, H. Wadati, M. Nakamura, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, 17 S. L. Johnson, and U. Staub, A time-dependent order parameter for ultrafast photoinduced ...

    2014

  29. [29]

    Banerjee, Y

    A. Banerjee, Y. Feng, D. M. Silevitch, J. Wang, J. C. Lang, H. H. Kuo, I. R. Fisher, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Charge transfer and multiple density waves in the rare earth tellurides, Physical Review B87, 155131 (2013)

    2013

  30. [30]

    R. G. Moore, W. S. Lee, P. S. Kirchman, Y. D. Chuang, A. F. Kemper, M. Trigo, L. Patthey, D. H. Lu, O. Krupin, M. Yi, D. A. Reis, D. Doering, P. Denes, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, G. Hays, P. Hering, T. Benson, J.-H. Chu, T. P. Devereaux, I. R. Fisher, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Ultrafast resonant soft x-ray diffraction dynamics of the charge density ...

    2016

  31. [31]

    Blanco-Canosa, A

    S. Blanco-Canosa, A. Frano, E. Schierle, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. Minola, M. Bluschke, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and M. Le Tacon, Resonant x-ray scattering study of charge-density wave correlations in YBa2Cu3O6+x, Physical Review B90, 054513 (2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    H. Jang, W. S. Lee, H. Nojiri, S. Matsuzawa, H. Yasumura, L. Nie, A. V. Maharaj, S. Gerber, Y. J. Liu, A. Mehta, D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, C. A. Burns, Z. Islam, S. Song, J. Hastings, T. P. Devereaux, Z. X. Shen, S. A. Kivelson, C. C. Kao, D. Zhu, and J. S. Lee, Ideal charge-density-wave order in the high-field state of superconducting YBCO, Proc...

    2016

  33. [33]

    Jacques, C

    V. Jacques, C. Laulhé, N. Moisan, S. Ravy, and D. Le Bolloc’h, Laser-Induced Charge-Density- Wave Transient Depinning in Chromium, Physical Review Letters117, 156401 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    Vogelgesang, G

    S. Vogelgesang, G. Storeck, J. G. Horstmann, T. Diekmann, M. Sivis, S. Schramm, K. Ross- nagel, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, Phase ordering of charge density waves traced by ultrafast low-energy electron diffraction, Nature Physics14, 184 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    A. W. Overhauser, Observability of Charge-Density Waves by Neutron Diffraction, Physical Review B3, 3173 (1971)

    1971

  36. [36]

    W. S. Lee, Y. D. Chuang, R. G. Moore, Y. Zhu, L. Patthey, M. Trigo, D. H. Lu, P. S. Kirchmann, O. Krupin, M. Yi, M. Langner, N. Huse, J. S. Robinson, Y. Chen, S. Y. Zhou, G. Coslovich, B. Huber, D. A. Reis, R. A. Kaindl, R. W. Schoenlein, D. Doering, P. Denes, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, S. L. Johnson, M. Först, T. Sasagawa, Y. F. Kung, A. P. Sorini, A...

    2012

  37. [37]

    Chase, M

    T. Chase, M. Trigo, A. H. Reid, R. Li, T. Vecchione, X. Shen, S. Weathersby, R. Coffee, N. Hartmann, D. A. Reis, X. J. Wang, and H. A. Dürr, Ultrafast electron diffraction from non-equilibrium phonons in femtosecond laser heated Au films, Applied Physics Letters108, 041909 (2016)

    2016

  38. [38]

    M. F. Lin, V. Kochat, A. Krishnamoorthy, L. Bassman, C. Weninger, Q. Zheng, X. Zhang, A. Apte, C. S. Tiwary, X. Shen, R. Li, R. Kalia, P. Ajayan, A. Nakano, P. Vashishta, F. Shi- mojo, X. Wang, D. M. Fritz, and U. Bergmann, Ultrafast non-radiative dynamics of atomically thin MoSe2, Nature Communications8, 1745 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    Tinnemann, C

    V. Tinnemann, C. Streubühr, B. Hafke, A. Kalus, A. Hanisch-Blicharski, M. Ligges, P. Zhou, D. Von Der Linde, U. Bovensiepen, and M. Horn-Von Hoegen, Ultrafast electron diffraction from a Bi(111) surface: Impulsive lattice excitation and Debye-Waller analysis at large mo- mentum transfer, Structural Dynamics6, 035101 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Grüner,Density Waves in Solids(CRC Press, 2018)

    G. Grüner,Density Waves in Solids(CRC Press, 2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    J. A. Sobota, Y. He, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum mate- rials, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 025006 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Y.WangandD.Wang,Writinganderasingtopologicaldefectsinchargedensitywavematerials with femtosecond laser pulses, Optics Letters44, 2939 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    S. P. Weathersby, G. Brown, M. Centurion, T. F. Chase, R. Coffee, J. Corbett, J. P. Eichner, J. C. Frisch, A. R. Fry, M. Gühr, N. Hartmann, C. Hast, R. Hettel, R. K. Jobe, E. N. Jonge- waard, J. R. Lewandowski, R. K. Li, A. M. Lindenberg, I. Makasyuk, J. E. May, D. McCormick, M. N. Nguyen, A. H. Reid, X. Shen, K. Sokolowski-Tinten, T. Vecchione, S. L. Vet...

    2015

  44. [44]

    H. Jang, H. D. Kim, M. Kim, S. H. Park, S. Kwon, J. Y. Lee, S. Y. Park, G. Park, S. Kim, H. Hyun, S. Hwang, C. S. Lee, C. Y. Lim, W. Gang, M. Kim, S. Heo, J. Kim, G. Jung, S. Kim, J. Park, J. Kim, H. Shin, J. Park, T. Y. Koo, H. J. Shin, H. Heo, C. Kim, C. K. Min, J. H. Han, H. S. Kang, H. S. Lee, K. S. Kim, I. Eom, and S. Rah, Time-resolved resonant elas...

    2020

  45. [45]

    Freelon, T

    B. Freelon, T. Rohwer, A. Zong, A. Kogar, H. Zhou, L. J. Wong, E. Ergeçen, and N. Gedik, Design and construction of a compact, high-repetition-rate ultrafast electron diffraction in- strument, Review of Scientific Instruments94, 053305 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    C. Lee, T. Rohwer, E. J. Sie, A. Zong, E. Baldini, J. Straquadine, P. Walmsley, D. Gardner, Y. S. Lee, I. R. Fisher, and N. Gedik, High resolution time- And angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy with 11 eV laser pulses, Review of Scientific Instruments91, 043102 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    E. J. Sie, T. Rohwer, C. Lee, and N. Gedik, Time-resolved XUV ARPES with tunable 24–33 eV laser pulses at 30 meV resolution, Nature Communications10, 3535 (2019). 20 NIR pump Soft X-ray probe (FEL) Hard X-ray reciprocal space mapping Avalanche photodiode Large-area X-ray detector High-energy electron probes phosphor screen and CCD camera mq = nG m1q+m2q' ...

    2019

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.