pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26854 · v1 · pith:7AMB2GB2new · submitted 2026-06-25 · ⚛️ physics.space-ph · astro-ph.IM· physics.geo-ph

Excursion-set structure factor of the auroral electric field

Magnus F Ivarsen , Kaili Song , Jean-Pierre St-Maurice , Glenn C Hussey This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 01:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.space-ph astro-ph.IMphysics.geo-ph
keywords auroral electric fieldstructure factorexcursion setradar echoespoint processspectral indexFarley-Bunemanionosphere
0
0 comments X

The pith

The structure factor of auroral radar echo positions equals the electric field spectrum to leading order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models coherent radar echoes from aurorae as a finite point process of locations where the electric field exceeds the ion-acoustic speed. It measures the structure factor S(k) from pairwise echo separations and shows that |S(k) - 1| recovers the power spectrum of the electric field to leading order. Comparison with in-situ satellite data confirms that both the radar-derived and direct spectra are scale-free with an index near -5/3 in co-moving frames. This establishes the echoes as an excursion-set sample that statistically images the field.

Core claim

Treating coherent radar echoes from aurorae as a finite point process of Farley-Buneman threshold exceedances, the structure factor S(k) measured from echo separations satisfies |S(k)-1| equal to the spectrum of the auroral electric field to leading order.

What carries the argument

The structure factor S(k) of the point process of radar echo locations, which encodes the electric field spectrum via |S-1| to leading order.

If this is right

  • The electric field spectrum can be obtained remotely from radar echo positions alone.
  • The spectrum is scale-free with index near -5/3 in co-moving frames.
  • The point process of echoes directly images the field's statistical properties.
  • Radar data can serve as a statistical probe of ionospheric electric field turbulence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same point-process method could be applied to other remote-sensing observations of threshold phenomena in plasmas.
  • Simulations of electric field fluctuations could test how robust the leading-order |S-1| relation remains under varying conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The radar echoes form a clean threshold sample of electric field exceedances without dominant selection biases or additional effects altering the point-process statistics.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the spectral index derived from the radar structure factor and the index measured directly in co-moving frames by in-situ instruments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26854 by Glenn C Hussey, Jean-Pierre St-Maurice, Kaili Song, Magnus F Ivarsen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows a single tracked echo population fol￾lowed across its 134 s lifetime, with its co-moving struc￾ture factor spectra shown beneath. In panel a), four snapshots ordered in time from left to right show the clus￾ter as it is tracked. Over its lifetime the population trans￾lates 224.7 km east and 76.6 km north, yielding a mean drift of 1780 m/s, while its outline deforms and the tra￾jectory lengthens and m… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) shows a comparison of the spectrum ob￾tained through a Monte Carlo-estimator (calculated with the method presented in Ref. [21]) and the structure fac￾tor estimators used in the present paper (Eq. 1), show￾ing excellent shapewise agreement. While the estimator Eq. (1) is expected to outperform the Monte Carlo sim￾ulations, we expect the latter to more accurately assess correlation in the case of few and… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We treat coherent radar echoes from aurorae as a finite point process and measure its structure factor $S(k)$ from pairwise echo separations. Backscatter requires electron drifts to exceed the ion-acoustic speed, making the echoes a threshold (excursion-set) sample of the ionospheric electric field, and $|S-1|$ is that field's spectrum, to leading order. We test this against \textit{in-situ} observations: in co-moving frames, the radar spectrum is scale-free with a spectral index near -5/3, matching the \textit{in-situ} indices. The auroral electric field is thus imaged by its excursion set, a point process of Farley-Buneman threshold exceedances.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that coherent radar echoes from aurorae form a finite point process whose structure factor S(k), measured from pairwise separations, satisfies |S-1| equal to the spectrum of the underlying auroral electric field to leading order. This follows because the echoes constitute an excursion-set sample of locations where electron drift exceeds the ion-acoustic speed (Farley-Buneman threshold). The claim is tested by showing that the radar-derived spectrum is scale-free with index near -5/3 in co-moving frames, matching in-situ observations.

Significance. If the leading-order relation between |S-1| and the electric-field spectrum can be rigorously derived and the excursion-set assumption holds without dominant biases, the work would establish radar echo locations as a direct statistical probe of the electric-field spectrum. This could complement in-situ measurements for studying ionospheric turbulence at scales inaccessible to spacecraft. The reported -5/3 index agreement is consistent with expected turbulent spectra but, as presented, tests only the recovered exponent.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central claim that |S-1| equals the electric-field spectrum to leading order rests on an unshown derivation. The manuscript must supply the explicit steps (including any assumptions on the point-process statistics and absence of selection biases) because this mapping is load-bearing for the entire interpretation.
  2. [Results] The validation consists of a spectral-index match near -5/3 with in-situ data, but without reported error analysis, full data-processing pipeline, or quantitative assessment of how additional effects (aspect angle, radar geometry, nonlinear saturation) might distort the pair-correlation function while preserving the exponent, the support for the unbiased excursion-set interpretation remains provisional.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the structure factor S(k) and the precise definition of the co-moving frame should be introduced with an equation or explicit reference to avoid ambiguity when comparing to in-situ spectra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects that require clarification and expansion in the manuscript. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central claim that |S-1| equals the electric-field spectrum to leading order rests on an unshown derivation. The manuscript must supply the explicit steps (including any assumptions on the point-process statistics and absence of selection biases) because this mapping is load-bearing for the entire interpretation.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the derivation of |S-1| equaling the electric-field spectrum to leading order is not shown in the manuscript. We will add this derivation in the revised version. The derivation proceeds from the fact that the echoes form an excursion set of a random field. For a Gaussian field above a high threshold, the excess pair correlation g(r)-1 is proportional to the field's correlation function C(r), so its Fourier transform yields S(k)-1 proportional to the power spectrum P(k). We will detail the assumptions: the electric field is modeled as a homogeneous isotropic Gaussian process in the co-moving frame, the threshold is constant, and selection biases from the radar (e.g., aspect sensitivity) are assumed not to introduce additional scale dependence in the inertial range. This will be added as a new subsection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The validation consists of a spectral-index match near -5/3 with in-situ data, but without reported error analysis, full data-processing pipeline, or quantitative assessment of how additional effects (aspect angle, radar geometry, nonlinear saturation) might distort the pair-correlation function while preserving the exponent, the support for the unbiased excursion-set interpretation remains provisional.

    Authors: We agree that the validation is limited and that additional information would strengthen the case. In the revision, we will add error analysis by reporting the standard deviation of the spectral index from multiple radar datasets and fitting procedures. The data-processing pipeline will be described in greater detail, including how pairwise separations are computed and how the co-moving frame is determined from Doppler shifts. Regarding additional effects, we will add a paragraph discussing how aspect angle, geometry, and nonlinear saturation could in principle distort the pair correlation; however, we argue that they primarily affect the overall amplitude or introduce anisotropy rather than changing the power-law index, consistent with the observed robustness of the -5/3 scaling. We will note that a full quantitative assessment would require modeling these effects explicitly, which is left for future work, and qualify our conclusions accordingly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: central mapping is a leading-order theoretical claim validated against independent in-situ data

full rationale

The paper states that coherent radar echoes form a threshold excursion-set sample of the electric field because backscatter requires electron drifts exceeding the ion-acoustic speed, and claims |S-1| equals the field's spectrum to leading order. This is presented as a theoretical result, not derived from fitting the same data. Validation consists of comparing the recovered scale-free spectral index (~-5/3) to separate in-situ observations, which is an external benchmark. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or reductions of the central claim to its own inputs appear in the abstract or described derivation. The structure-factor-to-spectrum step is therefore not tautological by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that radar backscatter occurs precisely at the ion-acoustic-speed threshold and that the resulting point process statistics map directly to the field spectrum at leading order.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Backscatter requires electron drifts to exceed the ion-acoustic speed, making echoes a threshold sample of the electric field
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the physical basis for the excursion-set model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5657 in / 1177 out tokens · 18436 ms · 2026-06-26T01:40:52.862817+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    stabilize

    may drive that evolution within the several-minutes duration of the conjunction (see, e.g., Ref. [53]). Several limitations qualify the reading. The estima- tor invokes isotropy only at the angle-averaging step and only in the thin-layer plane, whereas the irregularities are anisotropic, aspect-sensitive, and field-aligned [38]; this enters through the as...

    2026

  2. [2]

    D. T. Farley, A plasma instability resulting in field- aligned irregularities in the ionosphere, Journal of Geo- physical Research (1896-1977)68, 6083 (1963)

    1977

  3. [3]

    Buneman, Excitation of Field Aligned Sound Waves by Electron Streams, Physical Review Letters10, 285 (1963)

    O. Buneman, Excitation of Field Aligned Sound Waves by Electron Streams, Physical Review Letters10, 285 (1963)

    1963

  4. [4]

    R. A. Greenwald, Diffuse radar aurora and the gradient drift instability, Journal of Geophysical Research (1896- 1977)79, 4807 (1974)

    1977

  5. [5]

    B. G. Fejer and M. C. Kelley, Ionospheric irregularities, Reviews of Geophysics18, 401 (1980)

    1980

  6. [6]

    J. D. Sahr and B. G. Fejer, Auroral electrojet plasma irregularity theory and experiment: A critical review of present understanding and future directions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics101, 26893 (1996)

    1996

  7. [7]

    Bahcivan, D

    H. Bahcivan, D. L. Hysell, D. Lummerzheim, M. F. Larsen, and R. F. Pfaff, Observations of colocated op- tical and radar aurora, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics111, 10.1029/2006JA011923 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1029/2006ja011923 2006

  8. [8]

    D. L. Hysell, G. Michhue, M. F. Larsen, R. Pfaff, M. Nicolls, C. Heinselman, and H. Bahcivan, Imaging radar observations of Farley Buneman waves during the JOULE II experiment, Annales Geophysicae26, 1837 (2008)

    2008

  9. [9]

    M. F. Ivarsen, D. R. Huyghebaert, M. D. Gillies, J.-P. St-Maurice, D. R. Themens, M. Oppenheim, B. J. Gus- tavsson, D. Billett, B. Pitzel, D. Galeschuk, E. Dono- van, and G. C. Hussey, Turbulence Around Auroral Arcs, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics129, e2023JA032309 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Mounir, A

    H. Mounir, A. Berthelier, J. C. Cerisier, D. Lagoutte, and C. Beghin, The small-scale turbulent structure of the high latitude ionosphere - Arcad-Aureol-3 observations, Annales Geophysicae9, 725 (1991)

    1991

  11. [11]

    Spicher, W

    A. Spicher, W. J. Miloch, and J. I. Moen, Direct evidence of double-slope power spectra in the high-latitude iono- spheric plasma, Geophysical Research Letters41, 1406 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    J. P. St.-Maurice, P. Prikryl, D. W. Danskin, A. M. Hamza, G. J. Sofko, J. A. Koehler, A. Kustov, and J. Chen, On the origin of narrow non-ion-acoustic coher- ent radar spectra in the high-latitude E region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics99, 6447 (1994)

    1994

  13. [13]

    St.-Maurice and J

    J.-P. St.-Maurice and J. L. Chau, A theoretical frame- work for the changing spectral properties of meter-scale Farley-Buneman waves between 90 and 125 km altitudes, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics121, 10,341 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    St-Maurice, D

    J.-P. St-Maurice, D. Huyghebaert, M. F. Ivarsen, and G. C. Hussey, Narrow Width Farley-Buneman Spectra Above 100 km Altitude, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics128, e2022JA031191 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    H. L. P´ ecseli, Spectral properties of electrostatic drift wave turbulence in the laboratory and the ionosphere., Annales Geophysicae (09927689)33(2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    Vierinen, J

    J. Vierinen, J. L. Chau, H. Charuvil, J. M. Urco, M. Clahsen, V. Avsarkisov, R. Marino, and R. Volz, Ob- serving Mesospheric Turbulence With Specular Meteor Radars: A Novel Method for Estimating Second-Order Statistics of Wind Velocity, Earth and Space Science6, 1171 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    F. L. Poblet, J. Vierinen, V. Avsarkisov, J. F. Conte, H. Charuvil Asokan, C. Jacobi, and J. L. Chau, Horizon- tal Correlation Functions of Wind Fluctuations in the Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere, Journal of Geo- physical Research: Atmospheres128, e2022JD038092 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    F. L. Poblet, H. Liu, and J. L. Chau, Third-Order Struc- ture Functions of Zonal Winds in the Thermosphere Us- ing CHAMP and GOCE Observations, Geophysical Re- search Letters51, e2024GL108367 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Huyghebaert, G

    D. Huyghebaert, G. Hussey, J. Vierinen, K. McWilliams, and J.-P. St-Maurice, ICEBEAR: An all-digital bistatic coded continuous-wave radar for studies of the E region of the ionosphere, Radio Science54, 349 (2019). 9 FIG. 7.Panel a):The successful 184-second tracking of a north-eastward-moving echo structure, shown in four snapshots. The red disc denotes t...

    2019

  20. [20]

    Huyghebaert, J.-P

    D. Huyghebaert, J.-P. St.-Maurice, K. McWilliams, G. Hussey, A. D. Howarth, P. Rutledge, and S. Erion, The Properties of ICEBEAR E-Region Coherent Radar Echoes in the Presence of Near Infrared Auroral Emis- sions, as Measured by the Swarm-E Fast Auroral Im- ager, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 126, e2021JA029857 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Lozinsky, G

    A. Lozinsky, G. Hussey, K. McWilliams, D. Huyghe- baert, and D. Galeschuk, ICEBEAR-3D: A Low Eleva- tion Imaging Radar Using a Non-Uniform Coplanar Re- ceiver Array for E Region Observations, Radio Science 57, e2021RS007358 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    M. F. Ivarsen, A. Lozinsky, J.-P. St-Maurice, A. Spicher, D. Huyghebaert, G. C. Hussey, D. Galeschuk, B. Pitzel, and J. Vierinen, The Distribution of Small-Scale Irregu- larities in the E-Region, and Its Tendency to Match the Spectrum of Field-Aligned Current Structures in the F- Region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 128, e2022JA031233 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, G. Hussey, A. Spicher, Y. Jin, A. Lozinsky, L. V. Goodwin, D. Galeschuk, J. Park, and L. B. N. Clausen, Measuring small-scale plasma irregularities in the high-latitude E- and F- regions simultaneously, Scientific Reports13, 11579 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    M. F. Ivarsen, M. D. Gillies, D. R. Huyghebaert, J.-P. St-Maurice, A. Lozinsky, D. Galeschuk, E. Donovan, and G. C. Hussey, Turbulence Embedded Into the Ionosphere by Electromagnetic Waves, Journal of Geophysical Re- search: Space Physics129, e2023JA032310 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Debye, Zerstreuung von R¨ ontgenstrahlen, Annalen der Physik351, 809 (1915)

    P. Debye, Zerstreuung von R¨ ontgenstrahlen, Annalen der Physik351, 809 (1915). 10 FIG. 8.Panel a):The positions of the tracked echo cluster (red line with timestamps), the Swarm B orbit (blue line and timestamps), and thechainGNSS receiver pierce point (assuming an E-region pierce-point altitude, green circle).Panel b) shows a close-up of the conjunction. 11

    1915

  26. [26]

    Zernike and J

    F. Zernike and J. A. Prins, Die Beugung von R¨ ontgenstrahlen in Fl¨ ussigkeiten als Effekt der Molek¨ ulanordnung, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and nuclei41, 184 (1927)

    1927

  27. [27]

    M. S. Bartlett, The spectral analysis of two-dimensional point processes, Biometrika51, 299 (1964)

    1964

  28. [28]

    S. D. Landy and A. S. Szalay, Bias and Variance of An- gular Correlation Functions, The Astrophysical Journal 412, 64 (1993)

    1993

  29. [29]

    W. A. Hellwing, Clear and Measurable Signature of Modified Gravity in the Galaxy Velocity Field, Physical Review Letters112, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.221102 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.221102 2014

  30. [30]

    M. F. Ivarsen, P. Bull, C. Llinares, and D. F. Mota, Distinguishing screening mechanisms with environment- dependent velocity statistics, Astronomy & Astrophysics 595, A40 (2016), arXiv:1603.03072

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Torquato and F

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, Local density fluctua- tions, hyperuniformity, and order metrics, Physical Re- view E68, 041113 (2003)

    2003

  32. [32]

    M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, D. R. Huyghebaert, M. D. Gillies, F. Lind, B. Pitzel, and G. C. Hussey, Deriv- ing the Ionospheric Electric Field From the Bulk Motion of Radar Aurora in the E-Region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics129, e2024JA033060 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Kolmogorov, The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds’ Numbers, Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady30, 301 (1941)

    A. Kolmogorov, The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds’ Numbers, Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady30, 301 (1941)

    1941

  34. [34]

    Hawat, G

    D. Hawat, G. Gautier, R. Bardenet, and R. Lachi` eze- Rey, On estimating the structure factor of a point pro- cess, with applications to hyperuniformity, Statistics and Computing33, 61 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    A. B. Kostinski and A. R. Jameson, On the Spatial Dis- tribution of Cloud Particles, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences57, 901 (2000)

    2000

  36. [36]

    Ester, H.-P

    M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu, A density- based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise, inKdd, Vol. 96 (1996) pp. 226–231

    1996

  37. [37]

    M. F. Ivarsen, S. Marei, J. Cho, J.-P. St-Maurice, and G. C. Hussey, Extreme, transient bursts of energy in the auroral ionosphere. I. Predictive radar tracking (2026, submitted to JGR: Space Physics), arXiv:2605.31046 [physics.space-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    R. N. Bracewell,The Fourier Transform and Its Appli- cations, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986)

    1986

  39. [39]

    Kudeki and D

    E. Kudeki and D. T. Farley, Aspect sensitivity of equato- rial electrojet irregularities and theoretical implications, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics94, 426 (1989)

    1989

  40. [40]

    M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, G. C. Hussey, D. R. Huyghebaert, and M. D. Gillies, Point-cloud clustering and tracking algorithm for radar interferometry, Physical Review E110, 045207 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    K. Song, K. Meziane, A. M. Hamza, and P. T. Jayachan- dran, Investigation of the Fresnel Scale From Ionospheric Scintillation Spectra, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics130, e2024JA033239 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    P. T. Jayachandran, R. B. Langley, J. W. MacDougall, S. C. Mushini, D. Pokhotelov, A. M. Hamza, I. R. Mann, D. K. Milling, Z. C. Kale, R. Chadwick, T. Kelly, D. W. Danskin, and C. S. Carrano, Canadian High Arc- tic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN), Radio Science44, 10.1029/2008RS004046 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1029/2008rs004046 2009

  43. [43]

    M. F. Ivarsen, J. Park, Y.-S. Kwak, Y. Jin, D. J. Knud- sen, and L. B. N. Clausen, Observational Evidence for the Role of Hall Conductance in Alfv´ en Wave Reflection, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics125, e2020JA028119 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Tr¨ obs and G

    M. Tr¨ obs and G. Heinzel, Improved spectrum estimation from digitized time series on a logarithmic frequency axis, Measurement39, 120 (2006)

    2006

  45. [45]

    J. W. Gjerloev, The SuperMAG data processing tech- nique, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 117, 10.1029/2012JA017683 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1029/2012ja017683 2012

  46. [46]

    K. R. Sreenivasan, The passive scalar spectrum and the Obukhov–Corrsin constant, Physics of Fluids8, 189 (1996)

    1996

  47. [47]

    P. Bull, Y. Akrami, J. Adamek, T. Baker, E. Bellini, J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, E. Bentivegna, S. Camera, S. Clesse, J. H. Davis, E. Di Dio, J. Enander, A. Heavens, L. Heisenberg, B. Hu, C. Llinares, R. Maartens, E. M¨ ortsell, S. Nadathur, J. Noller, R. Pasechnik, M. S. Pawlowski, T. S. Pereira, M. Quartin, A. Ricciardone, S. Riemer-Sørensen, M. Rinaldi, J....

    2016

  48. [48]

    J. Park, H. L¨ uhr, D. J. Knudsen, J. K. Burchill, and Y.-S. Kwak, Alfv´ en waves in the auroral region, their Poynting flux, and reflection coefficient as estimated from Swarm observations, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics122, 2345 (2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    M. F. Ivarsen, Y. Jin, A. Spicher, and L. B. N. Clausen, Direct Evidence for the Dissipation of Small-Scale Iono- spheric Plasma Structures by a Conductive E Region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics124, 2935 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, Y. Jin, J. Park, W. Miloch, A. Spicher, Y.-S. Kwak, and L. B. N. Clausen, Steepening Plasma Density Spectra in the Iono- sphere: The Crucial Role Played by a Strong E-Region, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics126, e2021JA029401 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, Y. Jin, J. Park, L. M. Buschman, and L. B. Clausen, To what degree does the high-energy aurora destroy F-region irregularities?, Fron- tiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences11, 10.3389/fs- pas.2024.1309136 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3389/fs- 2024

  52. [52]

    M. F. Ivarsen, A source or a sink? How the altitude of particle precipitation influence high-latitude electro- dynamics, Annales Geophysicae44, 149 (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Miyashita, T.-F

    Y. Miyashita, T.-F. Chang, Y. Miyoshi, T. Hori, A. Kadokura, S. Kasahara, S.-Y. Wang, K. Keika, A. Matsuoka, Y. Tanaka, Y. Kasahara, M. Teramoto, C.-W. Jun, K. Asamura, Y. Kazama, S. W. Y. Tam, B.-J. Wang, S. Yokota, A. Kumamoto, F. Tsuchiya, M. Shoji, S. Kurita, S. Imajo, and I. Shinohara, Mag- netic Field and Energetic Particle Flux Oscillations and Hig...

    2021

  54. [54]

    Greene, D

    K. Greene, D. M. Miles, S. R. Bounds, J. W. Bonnell, C. Feltman, R. Roglans, and A. Streltsov, In Situ Evi- dence of Ionospheric Feedback Instability Adjacent to a 12 Quiescent Auroral Arc, Geophysical Research Letters52, e2024GL110479 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Physics Re- ports Hyperuniform States of Matter,745, 1 (2018)

    S. Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Physics Re- ports Hyperuniform States of Matter,745, 1 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    K. B. Baker and S. Wing, A new magnetic coordinate system for conjugate studies at high latitudes, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics94, 9139 (1989)

    1989

  57. [57]

    E. E. Salpeter, Electron Density Fluctuations in a Plasma, Physical Review120, 1528 (1960)

    1960

  58. [58]

    D’Errico, SLM-shape language modeling, SLM- Shape Language Modeling

    J. D’Errico, SLM-shape language modeling, SLM- Shape Language Modeling.. http://www. mathworks. com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24443-slm-shape- language-modeling: Mathworks (2009)

    2009

  59. [59]

    Bracewell and P

    R. Bracewell and P. B. Kahn, The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, American Journal of Physics34, 712 (1966)

    1966

  60. [60]

    Edelsbrunner and E

    H. Edelsbrunner and E. P. M¨ ucke, Three-dimensional al- pha shapes, ACM Trans. Graph.13, 43 (1994)

    1994

  61. [61]

    Bewley, Z

    A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, and B. Upcroft, Simple online and realtime tracking, in2016 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)(Ieee,

  62. [62]

    Wojke, A

    N. Wojke, A. Bewley, and D. Paulus, Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Process- ing (ICIP)(IEEE, 2017) pp. 3645–3649

    2017

  63. [63]

    H. W. Kuhn, The Hungarian method for the assign- ment problem, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly2, 83 (1955)

    1955

  64. [64]

    Keogh, S

    E. Keogh, S. Chu, D. Hart, and M. Pazzani, An online algorithm for segmenting time series, inProceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining(IEEE,

    2001

  65. [65]

    Yang and M

    S. Yang and M. Baum, Extended Kalman filter for extended object tracking, in2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)(IEEE, 2017) pp. 4386–4390

    2017

  66. [66]

    M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, G. C. Hussey, D. Billet, D. R. Huyghebaert, Y. Jin, Y. Miyashita, S. Kasahara, K. Song, P. T. Jayachandran, S. Yokota, Y. Miyoshi, K. Yamamoto, A. Shinbori, Y. Kasahara, I. Shinohara, and A. Matsuoka, Eastward transients in the dayside ionosphere. I. Electrodynamics on closed field lines, Phys- ical Review E112, 045204 (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    M. F. Ivarsen, Y. Miyashita, B. Pitzel, J.-P. St-Maurice, J. Park, D. R. Huyghebaert, Y. Shen, and G. C. Hussey, Extreme, transient bursts of energy in the auroral iono- sphere. II. A magnetotail dipolarization event (2026, submitted to JGR: Space Physics), arXiv:2606.11861 [physics.space-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    G. J. Sz´ ekely, M. L. Rizzo, and N. K. Bakirov, Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances, The Annals of Statistics35, 2769 (2007)

    2007