pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18957 · v1 · pith:7C7UZN7Wnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.stat-mech· nlin.SI· quant-ph

Generalized Hydrodynamics of Bloch Oscillations in the Absence of a Lattice

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 01:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.SIquant-ph
keywords Bloch oscillationsgeneralized hydrodynamicsYang-Gaudin modelquantum impuritiesintegrable quantum gasestwo-magnon bound statesultracold atoms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interactions in the two-component Yang-Gaudin model produce Bloch oscillations for finite-density impurities even without a lattice, with periods renormalized by bound states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a generalized hydrodynamic theory for Bloch oscillations that arise purely from interactions in the two-component Yang-Gaudin model of integrable quantum gases. These oscillations occur for a finite density of impurities in a homogeneous interacting background and continue superimposed on a drift caused by center-of-mass acceleration under constant force. The single-impurity oscillation period is renormalized when two-magnon bound states become populated at higher densities. A sympathetic reader would care because the results explain how periodic motion can emerge in continuum systems through many-body interactions, with direct implications for ultracold-atom experiments that can control impurity density.

Core claim

In the two-component Yang-Gaudin model, interaction-induced periodic dispersions cause Bloch oscillations under a constant force even in the absence of a lattice. Generalized hydrodynamics applied to finite impurity density shows these oscillations persist alongside a drift from center-of-mass acceleration. The period of single-impurity oscillations is renormalized at finite densities when two-magnon bound states are populated.

What carries the argument

Generalized hydrodynamics applied to the integrable two-component Yang-Gaudin model, which encodes the dynamics of interaction-generated Bloch oscillations for a finite density of impurities.

If this is right

  • Bloch oscillations arise in homogeneous continuum systems solely from strong interactions.
  • Oscillations at finite impurity density coexist with center-of-mass drift under constant acceleration.
  • Single-impurity oscillation periods become renormalized by the population of two-magnon bound states.
  • The description applies directly to ultracold-atom setups with controllable impurity densities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Interaction-driven oscillations could be harnessed to emulate lattice effects inside continuous gases for quantum simulation.
  • Density-dependent period shifts might serve as an experimental signature of bound-state formation in driven many-body systems.
  • The generalized-hydrodynamic approach may extend to other integrable models to predict analogous interaction-induced periodic motion.

Load-bearing premise

The two-component Yang-Gaudin model remains integrable at finite impurity density and generalized hydrodynamics accurately captures the Bloch oscillations induced by interactions alone without a lattice.

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurement of impurity velocity in an ultracold-atom experiment at varying densities to check whether the oscillation period renormalizes exactly as predicted when two-magnon bound states populate and whether a superimposed drift appears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18957 by Alvise Bastianello, Jacopo De Nardis, Michael Knap, Philip Zechmann, Stefano Scopa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Objects subjected to a constant force generally increase their velocity over time. This expectation fails whenever their energy is a smooth and periodic function of momentum, resulting in periodic Bloch oscillations instead. Periodic dispersions, typical of lattice systems, can also emerge in continuum media through strong interactions. Here, we study the phenomenon of such Bloch oscillations in the absence of a lattice in a paradigmatic model of integrable quantum gases: the two-component Yang-Gaudin model. We derive a generalized-hydrodynamic theory of Bloch oscillations for a finite density of impurities embedded in a homogeneous interacting background, which we show to persist superimposed to a drift due to the acceleration of the center of mass. Moreover, we show the single-impurity oscillation period is renormalized at finite impurity density when two-magnon bound states are populated. Our results are relevant for ultracold atom experiments, where impurities can be created at controllable densities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a generalized hydrodynamics (GHD) theory for Bloch oscillations of a finite density of impurities in the two-component Yang-Gaudin model subject to a constant, component-selective force, without an explicit lattice. It claims that interaction-induced oscillations persist superimposed on a center-of-mass drift and that the single-impurity oscillation period is renormalized when two-magnon bound states are populated at finite impurity density.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the work demonstrates how strong interactions in a continuum integrable gas can generate effective periodic dynamics under driving, extending GHD to component-selective forces. This yields concrete, falsifiable predictions for period renormalization tied to bound-state occupation, directly relevant to ultracold-atom experiments with tunable impurity densities.

major comments (3)
  1. The addition of a component-selective linear potential to the Yang-Gaudin Hamiltonian must be shown to preserve the full set of conserved charges required for integrability at finite impurity density; without this, the subsequent GHD equations lack a rigorous foundation. This is load-bearing for the entire claim of interaction-generated Bloch oscillations.
  2. The GHD rapidity equations must explicitly demonstrate how the dressing produces an effective periodic dispersion (or bounded motion) from the quadratic bare dispersion plus force term; the mechanism that maps rapidities to a lattice-like periodicity without an explicit lattice needs to be derived step-by-step, e.g., via the form of the effective velocity or force term in the hydrodynamic equations.
  3. The renormalization of the oscillation period at finite density due to populated two-magnon bound states requires a concrete expression or numerical result showing the density dependence; the abstract claim should be backed by an explicit formula or plot in the GHD solution that isolates the bound-state contribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the impurity and background components should be introduced consistently from the outset to avoid ambiguity when discussing finite-density effects.
  2. The abstract states the results are 'relevant for ultracold atom experiments' but does not specify which observables (e.g., center-of-mass position vs. time) would be measured; a brief experimental protocol would strengthen the motivation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The addition of a component-selective linear potential to the Yang-Gaudin Hamiltonian must be shown to preserve the full set of conserved charges required for integrability at finite impurity density; without this, the subsequent GHD equations lack a rigorous foundation. This is load-bearing for the entire claim of interaction-generated Bloch oscillations.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is necessary for rigor. In the revised manuscript we will add a short appendix verifying that the component-selective linear potential preserves the infinite set of conserved charges. Because the potential is linear and uniform in space, it commutes with the Yang-Gaudin transfer matrix up to a total derivative that does not affect the eigenvalues; the rapidities therefore remain good quantum numbers and the GHD framework retains its foundation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The GHD rapidity equations must explicitly demonstrate how the dressing produces an effective periodic dispersion (or bounded motion) from the quadratic bare dispersion plus force term; the mechanism that maps rapidities to a lattice-like periodicity without an explicit lattice needs to be derived step-by-step, e.g., via the form of the effective velocity or force term in the hydrodynamic equations.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for a clearer derivation. In the revision we will expand the relevant section to include a step-by-step calculation: starting from the bare quadratic dispersion and the constant force, we show how the dressing functions modify the effective velocity v(θ) and force term F(θ) in the GHD continuity equations. The resulting equations yield bounded oscillatory motion in rapidity space even though the bare dispersion is quadratic, thereby producing the interaction-induced periodicity. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The renormalization of the oscillation period at finite density due to populated two-magnon bound states requires a concrete expression or numerical result showing the density dependence; the abstract claim should be backed by an explicit formula or plot in the GHD solution that isolates the bound-state contribution.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit demonstration strengthens the claim. We will add a new figure and accompanying derivation that isolates the two-magnon bound-state density ρ_b and presents the renormalized period as a function of total impurity density. The GHD solution already contains the necessary occupation functions; we will extract and plot the resulting period renormalization to make the density dependence fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a derivation of generalized hydrodynamics for Bloch oscillations in the two-component Yang-Gaudin model under a component-selective force, starting from the integrable Hamiltonian and applying standard GHD equations to obtain the superimposed oscillations and period renormalization. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the integrability assumption and GHD applicability are external to the present derivation and not redefined within it. The result is self-contained against the model's conserved charges and does not rename or smuggle prior results as new predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the integrability of the Yang-Gaudin model and the applicability of generalized hydrodynamics to describe interaction-induced periodic dispersion without a lattice.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The two-component Yang-Gaudin model is integrable and admits a generalized hydrodynamic description at finite impurity density.
    This underpins the entire derivation as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5707 in / 1208 out tokens · 49235 ms · 2026-05-20T01:16:12.891285+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We derive a generalized-hydrodynamic theory of Bloch oscillations for a finite density of impurities embedded in a homogeneous interacting background... the single-impurity oscillation period is renormalized at finite impurity density when two-magnon bound states are populated.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Bloch, ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern, Zeitschrift f¨ ur physik52, 555 (1929)

    F. Bloch, ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern, Zeitschrift f¨ ur physik52, 555 (1929)

  2. [2]

    Zener, A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    C. Zener, A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Phys- ical Character145, 523 (1934)

  3. [3]

    Ben Dahan, E

    M. Ben Dahan, E. Peik, J. Reichel, Y. Castin, and C. Sa- lomon, Bloch oscillations of atoms in an optical potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4508 (1996)

  4. [4]

    Gustavsson, E

    M. Gustavsson, E. Haller, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, G. Rojas-Kopeinig, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Control of interaction-induced dephasing of bloch oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 080404 (2008)

  5. [5]

    Schmidt, M

    R. Schmidt, M. Knap, D. A. Ivanov, J.-S. You, M. Cetina, and E. Demler, Universal many-body response of heavy impurities coupled to a fermi sea: a review of recent progress, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 024401 (2018)

  6. [6]

    Giamarchi,Quantum physics in one dimension, Vol

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum physics in one dimension, Vol. 121 (Clarendon press, 2003)

  7. [7]

    D. M. Gangardt and A. Kamenev, Bloch oscillations in a one-dimensional spinor gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 070402 (2009)

  8. [8]

    K. A. Matveev and A. Furusaki, Spectral functions of strongly interacting isospin- 1 2 bosons in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 170403 (2008)

  9. [9]

    Kamenev and L

    A. Kamenev and L. I. Glazman, Dynamics of a one- dimensional spinor bose liquid: A phenomenological ap- proach, Phys. Rev. A80, 011603 (2009)

  10. [10]

    Schecter, D

    M. Schecter, D. Gangardt, and A. Kamenev, Dynam- ics and bloch oscillations of mobile impurities in one- dimensional quantum liquids, Annals of Physics327, 639 (2012)

  11. [11]

    Gamayun, O

    O. Gamayun, O. Lychkovskiy, and V. Cheianov, Ki- netic theory for a mobile impurity in a degenerate tonks- girardeau gas, Phys. Rev. E90, 032132 (2014)

  12. [12]

    kinetic theory for a mobile impurity in a de- generate tonks-girardeau gas

    M. Schecter, D. M. Gangardt, and A. Kamenev, Com- ment on “kinetic theory for a mobile impurity in a de- generate tonks-girardeau gas”, Phys. Rev. E92, 016101 (2015)

  13. [13]

    comment on ‘kinetic theory for a mobile impurity in a degenerate tonks-girardeau gas’

    O. Gamayun, O. Lychkovskiy, and V. Cheianov, Reply to “comment on ‘kinetic theory for a mobile impurity in a degenerate tonks-girardeau gas’ ”, Phys. Rev. E92, 016102 (2015)

  14. [14]

    L. Yang, L. Zhou, W. Yi, and X. Cui, Interaction-induced bloch oscillation in a harmonically trapped and fermion- ized quantum gas in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A95, 053617 (2017)

  15. [15]

    Lychkovskiy, O

    O. Lychkovskiy, O. Gamayun, and V. Cheianov, Nec- essary and sufficient condition for quantum adiabaticity in a driven one-dimensional impurity-fluid system, Phys. Rev. B98, 024307 (2018)

  16. [16]

    Majumdar and A

    S. Majumdar and A. Petkovi´ c, Bloch oscillations of a mo- bile impurity in a one-dimensional bose gas, Phys. Rev. A113, 043309 (2026)

  17. [17]

    Meinert, M

    F. Meinert, M. Knap, E. Kirilov, K. Jag-Lauber, M. B. Zvonarev, E. Demler, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Bloch oscilla- tions in the absence of a lattice, Science356, 945 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aah6616

  18. [18]

    Rabec, G

    F. Rabec, G. Chauveau, G. Brochier, S. Nascimbene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, Bloch oscillations of a soli- ton in a one-dimensional quantum fluid, Nature Physics 21, 1541 (2025)

  19. [19]

    M. V. Berry, Transitionless quantum driving, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42, 365303 (2009)

  20. [20]

    Takahashi,Thermodynamics of one-dimensional solv- able models(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    M. Takahashi,Thermodynamics of one-dimensional solv- able models(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

  21. [21]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, V. Yurovsky, and M. Olshanii, Re- laxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1d lattice hard-core bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 050405 (2007)

  22. [22]

    Langen, S

    T. Langen, S. Erne, R. Geiger, B. Rauer, T. Schweigler, M. Kuhnert, W. Rohringer, I. E. Mazets, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Experimental observation of a generalized gibbs ensemble, Science348, 207 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1257026

  23. [23]

    Calabrese, F

    P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and G. Mussardo, Intro- duction to ‘quantum integrability in out of equilibrium systems’, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016, 064001 (2016)

  24. [24]

    Guan and P

    X.-W. Guan and P. He, New trends in quantum integra- bility: recent experiments with ultracold atoms, Reports on Progress in Physics85, 114001 (2022)

  25. [25]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. X6, 041065 (2016)

  26. [26]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti, Transport in out-of-equilibrium xxz chains: Exact pro- files of charges and currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 207201 (2016)

  27. [27]

    Bastianello, B

    A. Bastianello, B. Bertini, B. Doyon, and R. Vasseur, In- troduction to the special issue on emergent hydrodynam- ics in integrable many-body systems, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2022, 014001 (2022)

  28. [28]

    Doyon, S

    B. Doyon, S. Gopalakrishnan, F. Møller, J. Schmied- 8 mayer, and R. Vasseur, Generalized hydrodynamics: a perspective, Phys. Rev. X15, 010501 (2025)

  29. [29]

    Schemmer, I

    M. Schemmer, I. Bouchoule, B. Doyon, and J. Dubail, Generalized hydrodynamics on an atom chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 090601 (2019)

  30. [30]

    Malvania, Y

    N. Malvania, Y. Zhang, Y. Le, J. Dubail, M. Rigol, and D. S. Weiss, Generalized hydrodynamics in strongly in- teracting 1D Bose gases, Science373, 1129 (2021)

  31. [31]

    Sch¨ uttelkopf, M

    P. Sch¨ uttelkopf, M. Tajik, N. Bazhan, F. Cataldini, S.- C. Ji, J. Schmiedmayer, and F. Møller, Characterizing transport in a quantum gas by measuring Drude weights, Science391, 290 (2026)

  32. [32]

    Dubois, G

    L. Dubois, G. Th´ em` eze, F. Nogrette, J. Dubail, and I. Bouchoule, Probing the local rapidity distribution of a one-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 113402 (2024)

  33. [33]

    Cataldini, F

    F. Cataldini, F. Møller, M. Tajik, J. a. Sabino, S.-C. Ji, I. Mazets, T. Schweigler, B. Rauer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Emergent Pauli blocking in a weakly interacting Bose gas, Phys. Rev. X12, 041032 (2022)

  34. [34]

    Møller, C

    F. Møller, C. Li, I. Mazets, H.-P. Stimming, T. Zhou, Z. Zhu, X. Chen, and J. Schmiedmayer, Extension of the generalized hydrodynamics to the dimensional crossover regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 090602 (2021)

  35. [35]

    K. Yang, Y. Zhang, K.-Y. Li, K.-Y. Lin, S. Gopalakr- ishnan, M. Rigol, and B. L. Lev, Phantom energy in the nonlinear response of a quantum many-body scar state, Science385, 1063 (2024)

  36. [36]

    Horvath, A

    M. Horvath, A. Bastianello, S. Dhar, R. Koch, Y. Guo, J.-S. Caux, M. Landini, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Observing bethe strings in an attractive Bose gas far from equi- librium (2025), arXiv:2505.10550

  37. [37]

    Y. Zeng, A. Bastianello, S. Dhar, Z. Wang, X. Yu, M. Horvath, G. E. Astrakharchik, Y. Guo, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and M. Landini, Realization of fractional fermi seas (2026), arXiv:2602.17657 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

  38. [38]

    C. N. Yang, Some exact results for the many-body prob- lem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function inter- action, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1312 (1967)

  39. [39]

    X.-W. Guan, M. T. Batchelor, and C. Lee, Fermi gases in one dimension: From bethe ansatz to experiments, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1633 (2013)

  40. [40]

    Mesty´ an, B

    M. Mesty´ an, B. Bertini, L. Piroli, and P. Calabrese, Spin- charge separation effects in the low-temperature trans- port of one-dimensional fermi gases, Phys. Rev. B99, 014305 (2019)

  41. [41]

    Scopa, P

    S. Scopa, P. Calabrese, and L. Piroli, Real-time spin- charge separation in one-dimensional fermi gases from generalized hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B104, 115423 (2021)

  42. [42]

    Scopa, P

    S. Scopa, P. Calabrese, and L. Piroli, Generalized hydro- dynamics of the repulsive spin- 1 2 fermi gas, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134314 (2022)

  43. [43]

    Doyon and T

    B. Doyon and T. Yoshimura, A note on generalized hy- drodynamics: inhomogeneous fields and other concepts, SciPost Phys.2, 014 (2017)

  44. [44]

    Bastianello, V

    A. Bastianello, V. Alba, and J.-S. Caux, Generalized hydrodynamics with space-time inhomogeneous interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 130602 (2019)

  45. [45]

    Doyon, T

    B. Doyon, T. Yoshimura, and J.-S. Caux, Soliton gases and generalized hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 045301 (2018)

  46. [46]

    Doyon, F

    B. Doyon, F. H¨ ubner, and T. Yoshimura, New classi- cal integrable systems from generalizedt T-deformations, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 251602 (2024)

  47. [47]

    Urilyon, L

    A. Urilyon, L. Biagetti, J. Kethepalli, and J. De Nardis, Simulating generalized fluids via interacting wave packet evolution, Phys. Rev. B113, 014314 (2026)

  48. [48]

    Bertini, F

    B. Bertini, F. H. L. Essler, S. Groha, and N. J. Robinson, Prethermalization and thermalization in models with weak integrability breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180601 (2015)

  49. [49]

    F. M. Surace and O. Motrunich, Weak integrability breaking perturbations of integrable models, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043019 (2023)

  50. [50]

    F. S. Møller and J. Schmiedmayer, Introducing iFluid: a numerical framework for solving hydrodynamical equa- tions in integrable models, SciPost Phys.8, 041 (2020)

  51. [51]

    Supplementary Material for details on the numerical im- plementation of GHD equations

  52. [52]

    Senaratne, D

    R. Senaratne, D. Cavazos-Cavazos, S. Wang, F. He, Y.-T. Chang, A. Kafle, H. Pu, X.-W. Guan, and R. G. Hulet, Spin-charge separation in a one-dimensional fermi gas with tunable interactions, Science376, 1305 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abn1719

  53. [53]

    Klauser and J.-S

    A. Klauser and J.-S. Caux, Equilibrium thermodynamic properties of interacting two-component bosons in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A84, 033604 (2011)

  54. [54]

    N. J. Robinson and R. M. Konik, Excitations in the yang–gaudin bose gas, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2017, 063101 (2017)

  55. [55]

    A. M. Kosevich, V. V. Gann, A. I. Zhukov, and V. P. Voronov, Magnetic soliton motion in a nonuniform mag- netic field, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics87, 401 (1998)

  56. [56]

    A. M. Kosevich, Bloch oscillations of magnetic solitons as an example of dynamical localization of quasiparticles in a uniform external field (review), Low Temperature Physics27, 513 (2001)

  57. [57]

    Congy, A

    T. Congy, A. M. Kamchatnov, and N. Pavloff, Dispersive hydrodynamics of nonlinear polarization waves in two- component Bose-Einstein condensates, SciPost Phys.1, 006 (2016)

  58. [58]

    S. V. Manakov, On the theory of two-dimensional sta- tionary self-focusing of electromagnetic waves, Soviet Physics-JETP38, 248 (1974)

  59. [59]

    Koch, J.-S

    R. Koch, J.-S. Caux, and A. Bastianello, Generalized hydrodynamics of the attractive non-linear schr¨ odinger equation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical55, 134001 (2022)

  60. [60]

    Koch and A

    R. Koch and A. Bastianello, Exact thermodynamics and transport in the classical sine-Gordon model, SciPost Phys.15, 140 (2023)

  61. [61]

    Bastianello, i

    A. Bastianello, i. c. v. Krajnik, and E. Ilievski, Landau- lifschitz magnets: Exact thermodynamics and transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 107102 (2024)

  62. [62]

    Lannig, C.-M

    S. Lannig, C.-M. Schmied, M. Pr¨ ufer, P. Kunkel, R. Strohmaier, H. Strobel, T. Gasenzer, P. G. Kevrekidis, and M. K. Oberthaler, Collisions of three-component vec- tor solitons in bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 170401 (2020)

  63. [63]

    Cominotti, A

    R. Cominotti, A. Berti, C. Dulin, C. Rogora, G. Lam- poresi, I. Carusotto, A. Recati, A. Zenesini, and G. Fer- rari, Ferromagnetism in an extended coherently coupled atomic superfluid, Phys. Rev. X13, 021037 (2023)

  64. [64]

    Menyuk, Pulse propagation in an elliptically birefrin- gent kerr medium, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 25, 2674 (1989)

    C. Menyuk, Pulse propagation in an elliptically birefrin- gent kerr medium, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 25, 2674 (1989). 9

  65. [65]

    Y. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal,Optical solitons: from fibers to photonic crystals(Academic press, 2003)

  66. [66]

    Gigon, A

    S. Scopa, P. Zechmann, K. Michael, J. De Nardis, and A. Bastianello, Generalized hydrodynamics of bloch oscillations in the absence of a lattice, 10.5281/zen- odo.20272044 (2026). 1 Supplementary Material Generalized Hydrodynamics of Bloch Oscillations in the Absence of a Lattice This Supplementary Material covers the technical aspects about the numerical...

  67. [67]

    We introduce a large cutoff Λ for the rapidity spaceλ∈(−∞,∞)→λ∈(−Λ,Λ), and a discretization{λ i}N i=0 with the conventionλ 0 =−Λ andλ N =Λ

    DISCRETIZING THE INTEGRAL EQUATIONS The integral equations governing the thermodynamics and hydrodynamics of the YG model are discretized as it follows. We introduce a large cutoff Λ for the rapidity spaceλ∈(−∞,∞)→λ∈(−Λ,Λ), and a discretization{λ i}N i=0 with the conventionλ 0 =−Λ andλ N =Λ. The discretization divides the rapidity space into intervals[λ i...

  68. [68]

    THE SOLUTION OF THE GHD EQUATIONS THROUGH THE METHOD OF CHARACTERISTICS The GHD equations are solved with the method of characteristics [44, 50] in the space of the filling functions. Before discretizing, the GHD equation∂ tϑj(λ)+a eff j (λ)∂ λϑj(λ)=0 can be implicitly solved as (for the sake of clarity, below we restore the explicit time dependence) ϑj;t...

  69. [69]

    ADDITIONAL DATA: ARTIFICIAL SUPPRESSION OF TWO-MAGNON STATES FIG. S1.Perfect Bloch oscillations in the absence of two magnon excitations.—The normalized impurity current ⟨ˆj↓⟩GHD/n↓ is shown for an evolved thermal state withγ=1 and adimensional temperature Θ=1 and large magnetization, where we artificially suppress excitations of stringsj>1. Bloch oscilla...