Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Enforcing Delayed-Impact Fairness Guarantees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.11744 v1 pith:7F32UAND submitted 2022-08-24 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairnesslong-termenforcingimpactalgorithmconstraintsfairguarantees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent research has shown that seemingly fair machine learning models, when used to inform decisions that have an impact on peoples' lives or well-being (e.g., applications involving education, employment, and lending), can inadvertently increase social inequality in the long term. This is because prior fairness-aware algorithms only consider static fairness constraints, such as equal opportunity or demographic parity. However, enforcing constraints of this type may result in models that have negative long-term impact on disadvantaged individuals and communities. We introduce ELF (Enforcing Long-term Fairness), the first classification algorithm that provides high-confidence fairness guarantees in terms of long-term, or delayed, impact. We prove that the probability that ELF returns an unfair solution is less than a user-specified tolerance and that (under mild assumptions), given sufficient training data, ELF is able to find and return a fair solution if one exists. We show experimentally that our algorithm can successfully mitigate long-term unfairness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with High-Confidence Safety Constraints

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HC-RLHF returns an aligned language model only after a held-out safety test certifies, with probability at least 1-delta, that expected harm (as judged by a learned cost model) is below a chosen threshold.

  2. FairSense: Long-Term Fairness Analysis of ML-Enabled Systems

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FairSense uses Monte-Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis to identify which design and environmental parameters drive long-term unfairness in ML-enabled systems, demonstrated on three case studies.

Pith tools