REVIEW 2 cited by
Generating consistent PDDL domains with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of transforming natural language domain descriptions into plausibly looking PDDL markup. However, ensuring that actions are consistent within domains still remains a challenging task. In this paper we present a novel concept to significantly improve the quality of LLM-generated PDDL models by performing automated consistency checking during the generation process. Although the proposed consistency checking strategies still can't guarantee absolute correctness of generated models, they can serve as valuable source of feedback reducing the amount of correction efforts expected from a human in the loop. We demonstrate the capabilities of our error detection approach on a number of classical and custom planning domains (logistics, gripper, tyreworld, household, pizza).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning Compositional Behaviors from Demonstration and Language
BLADE learns structured, planable action representations from language-annotated demonstrations and composes them with a symbolic planner, outperforming latent and LLM/VLM baselines on new manipulation tasks.
-
Generating Symbolic World Models via Test-time Scaling of Large Language Models
Best-of-N sampling plus iterative self-critique, called iVML, lets a 7B open LLM generate PDDL planning domains with over 85% and 71% success on two benchmarks, outperforming o1-mini.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.