pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15849 · v1 · pith:7R3RWVFVnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🧮 math.AP

Anisotropic gradient rearrangement of BV functions and applications

Gloria Paoli , Yabo Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords anisotropic symmetrizationBV functionsgradient rearrangementL1 comparisonisoperimetric inequalitiestorsional rigiditydistributional gradient
0
0 comments X

The pith

Anisotropic symmetrization of the distributional gradient for BV functions yields an L1 comparison to the original function.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a symmetrization technique for BV functions in anisotropic settings by separating the absolutely continuous and singular parts of the anisotropic gradient. This generalizes a recent Euclidean result and establishes an L1 comparison between a function and its anisotropic symmetrization. Such a comparison would matter for proving geometric inequalities without relying on Euclidean symmetry. It opens the door to applications in deriving isoperimetric inequalities for functionals involving torsional rigidity under directional dependence.

Core claim

By separating the absolutely continuous part of the anisotropic gradient from its singular part, we define an anisotropic symmetrization of BV functions and prove that the function and its symmetrization satisfy an L1 comparison inequality. This is applied to obtain isoperimetric inequalities for some geometric functionals related to the torsional rigidity.

What carries the argument

Anisotropic gradient rearrangement, which rearranges the absolutely continuous part of the gradient while handling the singular part separately using a fixed convex body.

If this is right

  • Isoperimetric inequalities for geometric functionals related to torsional rigidity.
  • Generalization of Euclidean gradient rearrangement results to the anisotropic case.
  • Tools for analyzing BV functions in non-isotropic geometries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could link to broader rearrangement inequalities in convex geometry.
  • Applications might extend to numerical verification on simple domains like balls deformed by the anisotropy.
  • Further work could explore stability versions of the L1 comparison.

Load-bearing premise

The anisotropy, given by a fixed convex body or norm, permits separating the absolutely continuous and singular parts of the distributional gradient.

What would settle it

A counterexample BV function for which the L1 norm of the difference with its anisotropic symmetrization violates the claimed comparison.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce a symmetrization technique for the distributional gradient of a function of bounded variation in the anisotropic setting. This generalizes the result obtained in the Euclidean case in [Amato-Gentile-Nitsch-Trombetti, 2024] by separating the absolutely continuous part of the anisotropic gradient from its singular part. Our main result is an $L^1$ comparison between the function and its anisotropic symmetrization. Moreover, as an application, we derive isoperimetric inequalities for some geometric functionals related to the torsional rigidity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an anisotropic symmetrization for the distributional gradient of BV functions by separating the absolutely continuous and singular parts of the anisotropic gradient, generalizing the Euclidean case from Amato-Gentile-Nitsch-Trombetti (2024). The main result is an L¹ comparison between a BV function u and its anisotropic symmetrization u*. Applications derive isoperimetric inequalities for functionals related to torsional rigidity.

Significance. If the central L¹ comparison holds, the work provides a parameter-free extension of rearrangement techniques to anisotropic BV settings using a fixed convex body to encode the anisotropy. This builds directly on standard coarea and measure-theoretic tools that carry over from the Euclidean case, and the applications to torsional rigidity functionals offer concrete geometric consequences.

minor comments (2)
  1. [§1] §1, Introduction: the statement of the main L¹ comparison (Theorem 1.1) would benefit from an explicit display of the inequality involving the anisotropic perimeter to make the separation of gradient parts immediately visible.
  2. [§3] §3, Definition of anisotropic rearrangement: the notation for the singular part rearrangement could be aligned more clearly with the Euclidean reference [2024] to highlight the generalization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The provided summary correctly captures the main contributions regarding the anisotropic symmetrization of the distributional gradient of BV functions and the derived isoperimetric inequalities for torsional rigidity functionals.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external citation and standard BV tools

full rationale

The paper generalizes the Euclidean gradient rearrangement from the externally cited 2024 work by Amato-Gentile-Nitsch-Trombetti (different authors) by separating absolutely continuous and singular parts of the anisotropic gradient using a fixed convex body. The central L1 comparison is obtained via standard measure-theoretic tools including the coarea formula and BV perimeter definitions that carry over independently. No self-definitional reductions, no parameters fitted and relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations appear; the argument remains parameter-free and externally verifiable against classical BV theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard properties of BV functions and the existence of an anisotropic rearrangement that respects a given norm or convex body; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Functions belong to the space BV of bounded variation, so their distributional gradient is a Radon measure.
    Invoked to define the absolutely continuous and singular parts of the anisotropic gradient.
  • domain assumption Anisotropy is given by a fixed convex body allowing a well-defined rearrangement operator.
    Required to extend the Euclidean symmetrization technique.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5607 in / 1320 out tokens · 91513 ms · 2026-05-20T16:49:58.783408+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alvino, V

    A. Alvino, V. Ferone, G. Trombetti, and P. L. Lions. Convex symmetrization and appli- cations. 14(2):275–293, 1997

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Alvino, V

    A. Alvino, V. Ferone, G. Trombetti, and P. L. Lions. Convex symmetrization and appli- cations.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 14(2):275–293, 1997. 21

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    Alvino, P

    A. Alvino, P. L. Lions, and G. Trombetti. Comparison results for elliptic and parabolic equations via schwarz symmetrization.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 7(2):37–65, 1990

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Alvino, C

    A. Alvino, C. Nitsch, and C. Trombetti. A Talenti comparison result for solutions to elliptic problems with Robin boundary conditions.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 76(3):585– 603, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Alvino and G

    A. Alvino and G. Trombetti. Sulle migliori costanti di maggiorazione per una classe di equazioni ellittiche degeneri.Ricerche di Matematica, 27(2):413–428, 1978

    work page 1978

  6. [6]

    Alvino, G

    A. Alvino, G. Trombetti, and P. L. Lions. On optimization problems with prescribed rearrangements.Nonlinear Anal., 13(2):185–220, 1989

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    Amar and G

    M. Amar and G. Bellettini. A notion of total variation depending on a metric with discontinuous coefficients.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 11(1):91–133, 1994

    work page 1994

  8. [8]

    Amato and L

    V. Amato and L. Barbato. Quantitative comparison results for first-order Hamilton-Jacobi equations.Acta Appl. Math., 200(1), 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Amato and A

    V. Amato and A. Gentile. On the symmetric rearrangement of the gradient of a Sobolev function.Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl., 34(2):433–450, 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Amato, A

    V. Amato, A. Gentile, C. Nitsch, and C. Trombetti. On the gradient rearrangement of functions.Math. Ann., 390(3):4265–4281, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, and D. Pallara.Functions of bounded variation and free discontinu- ity problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    M. F. Betta and A. Mercalso. Uniqueness results for optimization problems with prescribed rearrangement.Potential Analysis, 5(2):183–205, 1996

    work page 1996

  13. [13]

    J. E. Brothers and W. P. Ziemer. Minimal rearrangements of Sobolev functions.J. Reine Angew. Math., 384:153–179, 1988

    work page 1988

  14. [14]

    Bucur and A

    D. Bucur and A. Giacomini. A variational approach to the isoperimetric inequality for the Robin eigenvalue problem.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 198(3):927–961, 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Busemann

    H. Busemann. The isoperimetric problem in the Minkowski plane.Amer. J. Math., 69:863–871, 1947

    work page 1947

  16. [16]

    L. Chen, T. Wu, J. Yan, and Y.B. Yang. Classification of positive solutions of crit- ical anisotropic sobolev equation without the finite volume constraint.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11628, 2024. 22

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Chen and Y

    L. Chen and Y. B. Yang. A talenti comparison result for anisotropic laplacian operator with neumann boundary conditions. preprint, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Chen and Y.B

    L. Chen and Y.B. Yang. Talenti comparison results and rigidity results for anisotropic p-laplacian operator with robin boundary conditions.Advanced Nonlinear Studies, 25(4):1047–1078, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    A. Cianchi. On thel q norm of functions having equidistributed gradients.Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods&Applications, 26(12):2007–2021, 1996

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Cianchi and A

    A. Cianchi and A. Ferone. A strengthened version of the hardy-littlewood inequality.J. Lond. Math. Soc., 77(3):581–592, 2008

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Cianchi and N

    A. Cianchi and N. Fusco. Functions of bounded variation and rearrangements.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 165(1):1–40, 2002

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    Dacorogna and C

    B. Dacorogna and C. E. Pfister. Wulff theorem and best constant in Sobolev inequality. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 71(2):97–118, 1992

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    L. C. Evans and R. F. Gariepy.Measure theory and fine properties of functions. Textbooks in Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, second edition, 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Ferone and R

    A. Ferone and R. Volpicelli. Minimal rearrangements of sobolev functions: a new proof. 20(2):333–339, 2003

    work page 2003

  25. [25]

    Ferone and M

    V. Ferone and M. R. Posteraro. Maximization on classes of functions with fixed rearrange- ment.Differential Integral Equations, 4(4):707–718, 1991

    work page 1991

  26. [26]

    Fonseca and S

    I. Fonseca and S. M¨ uller. A uniqueness proof for the Wulff theorem.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 119(1-2):125–136, 1991

    work page 1991

  27. [27]

    Giarrusso and D

    E. Giarrusso and D. Nunziante. Symmetrization in a class of first-order hamilton-jacobi equations.Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 8(4):289–299, 1984

    work page 1984

  28. [28]

    P. L. Lions. Solutions generalisees des equations hamilton-jacobi du premier ordre. 1981

    work page 1981

  29. [29]

    P. L. Lions. Generalized solutions of hamilton-jacobi equations. Pitman, London, 1982

    work page 1982

  30. [30]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

    Francesco Maggi.Sets of finite perimeter and geometric variational problems, volume 135 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

    work page

  31. [31]

    An introduction to geometric measure theory

    work page

  32. [32]

    A. L. Masiello and G. Paoli. A rigidity result for the robin torsion problem.J. Geom. Anal., 33(5):149, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    A. L. Masiello and G. Paoli. Rigidity results for the p-laplacian poisson problem with robin boundary conditions.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 202:628– 648, 2024. 23

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Mercaldo

    A. Mercaldo. A remark on comparison results for first-order Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Nonlinear Anal., 28(9):1465–1477, 1997

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Sannipoli

    R. Sannipoli. Comparison results for solutions to the anisotropic laplacian with robin boundary conditions.Nonlinear Anal., 214:112615, 2022

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    G. Talenti. Elliptic equations and rearrangements.Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Classe di Scienze, 3(4):697–718, 1976

    work page 1976

  37. [37]

    G. Talenti. Nonlinear elliptic equations, rearrangements of functions and Orlicz spaces. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 120:160–184, 1979

    work page 1979

  38. [38]

    G. Talenti. On the first eigenvalue of the clamped plate. InNonlinear partial differential equations and their applications. Coll` ege de France seminar, Vol. VI (Paris, 1982/1983), volume 109 ofRes. Notes in Math., pages 309–323. Pitman, Boston, MA, 1984

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    R. Caccioppoli

    G. Talenti. Inequalities in rearrangement invariant function spaces. InNonlinear analy- sis, function spaces and applications, Vol. 5 (Prague, 1994), pages 177–230. Prometheus, Prague, 1994. E-mail address, Y. Yang (corresponding author):Yabo Yang0927@outlook.com School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, P. R. ...

    work page 1994