REVIEW 2 cited by
Image Search with Text Feedback by Additive Attention Compositional Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Effective image retrieval with text feedback stands to impact a range of real-world applications, such as e-commerce. Given a source image and text feedback that describes the desired modifications to that image, the goal is to retrieve the target images that resemble the source yet satisfy the given modifications by composing a multi-modal (image-text) query. We propose a novel solution to this problem, Additive Attention Compositional Learning (AACL), that uses a multi-modal transformer-based architecture and effectively models the image-text contexts. Specifically, we propose a novel image-text composition module based on additive attention that can be seamlessly plugged into deep neural networks. We also introduce a new challenging benchmark derived from the Shopping100k dataset. AACL is evaluated on three large-scale datasets (FashionIQ, Fashion200k, and Shopping100k), each with strong baselines. Extensive experiments show that AACL achieves new state-of-the-art results on all three datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Multimodal Reasoning Agent for Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval
A zero-shot composed image retrieval model trained on synthetic triplets, generated by an MLLM from moderately similar unlabeled image pairs, beats prior methods on three benchmarks.
-
MLLM-Guided VLM Fine-Tuning with Joint Inference for Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval
MVFT-JI trains a Q-Former VLM with two MLLM-generated retrieval tasks and fuses VLM and MLLM similarities at inference, achieving state-of-the-art zero-shot composed image retrieval on three benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.