Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Rewarding Chatbots for Real-World Engagement with Millions of Users

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.06135 v2 pith:A7GRGEQX submitted 2023-03-10 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords chatbotsmodeluserengagementlanguagerewardusersapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of pretrained large language models has led to the deployment of a range of social chatbots for chitchat. Although these chatbots demonstrate language ability and fluency, they are not guaranteed to be engaging and can struggle to retain users. This work investigates the development of social chatbots that prioritize user engagement to enhance retention, specifically examining the use of human feedback to efficiently develop highly engaging chatbots. The proposed approach uses automatic pseudo-labels collected from user interactions to train a reward model that can be used to reject low-scoring sample responses generated by the chatbot model at inference time. Intuitive evaluation metrics, such as mean conversation length (MCL), are introduced as proxies to measure the level of engagement of deployed chatbots. A/B testing on groups of 10,000 new daily chatbot users on the Chai Research platform shows that this approach increases the MCL by up to 70%, which translates to a more than 30% increase in user retention for a GPT-J 6B model. Future work aims to use the reward model to realise a data fly-wheel, where the latest user conversations can be used to alternately fine-tune the language model and the reward model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ThinkRetrieve: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Traces for Test-Time Scaling

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Per-step retrieval of solved exemplars injected into the reasoning trace improves test-time scaling accuracy, with up to 13.4 absolute points gained on AIME 2025.

  2. Beyond Borrowed Histories: Person-Aligned User Simulation for Interactive Role-Playing Evaluation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PALATE trains five per-user simulators and personalized rubrics from real chat histories, then evaluates 16 role-playing agents on free multi-turn conversations, finding user-dependent winners.

  3. It's Not That Simple. An Analysis of Simple Test-Time Scaling

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The apparent scaling behavior of the s1 model is mostly an artifact of truncating long outputs, while appending 'Wait' does not reliably improve answers.

  4. Thinking Short and Right Over Thinking Long: Serving LLM Reasoning Efficiently and Accurately

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SART reduces LLM serving latency by combining redundant branch sampling with early stopping and PRM-based dynamic branch pruning, while keeping answer accuracy comparable to baseline methods.

  5. Efficiently Scaling LLM Reasoning with Certaindex

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Certaindex measures when an LLM's intermediate answers stop changing, enabling early exit and dynamic token allocation that cuts token usage by up to 50% with no accuracy drop in tested workloads.

Pith tools