Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Capuchin: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.08283 v5 pith:ADFQDRAK submitted 2019-02-21 cs.DB cs.AI

classification cs.DBcs.AI
keywords fairnessdatabaserepaircausalconditionsalgorithmsclassifierscorrectly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fairness is increasingly recognized as a critical component of machine learning systems. However, it is the underlying data on which these systems are trained that often reflect discrimination, suggesting a database repair problem. Existing treatments of fairness rely on statistical correlations that can be fooled by statistical anomalies, such as Simpson's paradox. Proposals for causality-based definitions of fairness can correctly model some of these situations, but they require specification of the underlying causal models. In this paper, we formalize the situation as a database repair problem, proving sufficient conditions for fair classifiers in terms of admissible variables as opposed to a complete causal model. We show that these conditions correctly capture subtle fairness violations. We then use these conditions as the basis for database repair algorithms that provide provable fairness guarantees about classifiers trained on their training labels. We evaluate our algorithms on real data, demonstrating improvement over the state of the art on multiple fairness metrics proposed in the literature while retaining high utility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Fair Game: Auditing & Debiasing AI Algorithms Over Time

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Proposes 'Fair Game', a reinforcement-learning loop in which an auditor's bias criteria, updatable over time, steer a debiasing agent that adapts an ML model's predictions.

  2. Data Management for Causal Algorithmic Fairness

    cs.DB 2019-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Fairness requires causal, not merely correlational, criteria, and data management techniques can be used to detect and enforce such criteria.

Pith tools