pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10157 · v1 · pith:AZ7Q2YC6new · submitted 2026-06-08 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

An Algebraic State Observer for a Self-Sensing Active Magnetic Bearing System

Olga Zarina , Natalya Martyuhova , Alexey Bobtsov , Romeo Ortega This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords active magnetic bearingstate observeralgebraic observerself-sensingcurrent voltage measurementsglobal stabilitysensorless control
0
0 comments X

The pith

An algebraic relation valid for all times yields a globally stable observer for self-sensing active magnetic bearings from currents and voltages alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to design a state observer for active magnetic bearing systems that requires only current and voltage measurements, eliminating the need for separate position sensors. It first derives an algebraic relation linking the unmeasurable states directly to filtered inputs and outputs that remains true at every instant. From this relation the authors construct a robust asymptotic observer with global stability. A reader would care because self-sensing designs can simplify hardware, lower costs, and improve reliability in rotating machinery where extra sensors are impractical.

Core claim

The authors obtain an algebraic relation between the unmeasurable part of the state and filtered versions of the system inputs and outputs that holds for all times; this relation is then used to construct first a high-performance algebraic observer and subsequently a robust asymptotic version of the observer that is globally stable.

What carries the argument

The algebraic relation between unmeasurable states and filtered inputs/outputs that holds identically for all times.

If this is right

  • Position and velocity states become reconstructible without dedicated sensors.
  • The algebraic observer can be implemented using only standard current and voltage signals.
  • The asymptotic version inherits global stability from the underlying algebraic identity.
  • Performance can be verified through simulation of the closed-loop observer dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same algebraic construction might apply to other electromechanical systems whose dynamics allow similar filtering identities.
  • Hardware cost savings could be quantified by comparing sensor-equipped versus sensorless bearing assemblies in industrial tests.
  • Convergence speed of the asymptotic observer could be compared against conventional Luenberger or high-gain designs on the same AMB model.

Load-bearing premise

The active magnetic bearing dynamics admit an exact algebraic relation between unmeasurable states and filtered inputs and outputs that remains valid at every instant.

What would settle it

A direct substitution of the system model into the proposed algebraic relation that produces a nonzero residual at some time would show the relation does not hold.

read the original abstract

The problem of designing a globally stable observer for a self-sensing active magnetic bearing system assuming only measurements of currents and voltages is addressed in this paper. Towards this end, we first design a radically different, high performance, state observer, which is obtained invoking novel techniques. Indeed, our objective is to obtain an algebraic relation between the unmeasurable part of the state and filtered versions of the systems inputs and outputs, which holds for all times. Then, using this algebraic observer, we propose a robust asymptotic version of the observer. Simulation results that illustrate the performance of the observer are also presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to design a globally stable state observer for a self-sensing active magnetic bearing (AMB) system using only current and voltage measurements. It first derives an exact algebraic relation between unmeasurable states and filtered inputs/outputs that holds for all times via novel techniques, then constructs a robust asymptotic observer from this relation, with simulation results to illustrate performance.

Significance. If the algebraic relation is exactly derivable and globally valid for the nonlinear AMB dynamics without hidden assumptions or parameter fitting, the approach offers a high-performance alternative to conventional dynamic observers, with the explicit separation of algebraic and asymptotic forms as a clear strength. Simulation results provide initial practical validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Algebraic Observer): The derivation establishing the exact algebraic relation valid for all t must be shown explicitly from the AMB dynamics; without the intermediate steps, it is unclear whether the filtering operations preserve the all-time validity or introduce implicit differentiability assumptions on the inputs.
  2. [§4] §4 (Robust Asymptotic Observer): The global stability claim for the asymptotic version relies on the algebraic relation being exact; the proof should address how bounded perturbations in the nonlinear magnetic force terms affect the error dynamics, as this is load-bearing for the 'globally stable' assertion in the abstract.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Simulations] Simulation section: Include quantitative metrics (e.g., steady-state error norms) alongside the qualitative plots to strengthen the performance claims.
  2. [Notation] Notation: Define the filtered signals (e.g., the specific low-pass filter transfer function) at first use to avoid ambiguity in the algebraic relation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Algebraic Observer): The derivation establishing the exact algebraic relation valid for all t must be shown explicitly from the AMB dynamics; without the intermediate steps, it is unclear whether the filtering operations preserve the all-time validity or introduce implicit differentiability assumptions on the inputs.

    Authors: We agree that the intermediate derivation steps should be presented explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will insert a detailed, step-by-step derivation starting from the AMB dynamics equations, showing each filtering operation and verifying that the resulting algebraic relation holds identically for all t. The filters are strictly proper and causal; no additional differentiability of the inputs is required beyond the standard regularity assumed for the system trajectories. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Robust Asymptotic Observer): The global stability claim for the asymptotic version relies on the algebraic relation being exact; the proof should address how bounded perturbations in the nonlinear magnetic force terms affect the error dynamics, as this is load-bearing for the 'globally stable' assertion in the abstract.

    Authors: The asymptotic observer is designed so that the algebraic relation supplies an exact feedforward term while the correction term ensures robustness. To make this explicit, the revised proof will include a Lyapunov analysis of the error dynamics that explicitly bounds the effect of bounded perturbations arising from the nonlinear magnetic force terms, showing that the estimation error remains globally ultimately bounded (or converges to zero under the stated conditions). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper claims to derive an algebraic relation between unmeasurable states and filtered I/O that holds for all t, obtained via novel techniques on the AMB model, followed by a robust asymptotic version. No quoted equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the derivation is presented as following from the system dynamics without internal reduction to inputs. This is the most common honest finding for model-based observer papers that remain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim implicitly rests on the existence of an exact algebraic relation for the specific AMB dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5630 in / 1016 out tokens · 15955 ms · 2026-06-27T15:11:17.259799+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Berlin,Heidelberg:SpringerBerlinHeidelberg

    E.H.Maslen2009.Self–SensingMagneticBearings,pp.435–459. Berlin,Heidelberg:SpringerBerlinHeidelberg

  2. [2]

    Displacement Self-Sensing Active Magnetic Bearing Drives—An Overview

    Y. Yang, Y. Huang, F. Peng,, and Y. Yao. “Displacement Self-Sensing Active Magnetic Bearing Drives—An Overview.” Sensors25,no.20(2025):6481

    2025

  3. [3]

    Astolfi, D

    A. Astolfi, D. Karagiannis,, and R. Ortega. 2008.Nonlinear and Adaptive Control with Applications, Communications and ControlEngineering.Berlin:Springer-Verlag

    2008

  4. [4]

    P.Bernard2019.ObserverDesignforNonlinearSystems, Switzer- land:Springer

  5. [5]

    Observer design for continuous-time dynamical systems

    P. Bernard, V. Andrieu,, and D. Astolfi. “Observer design for continuous-time dynamical systems.” .Annual Reviews in Con- trol(2022):224–248

    2022

  6. [6]

    Vischer 1988.Sensorlose Und Spannungsgesteuerte Magnet- lager, Ph.D.Thesis.Zurich,Switzerland:ETHZurich

    D. Vischer 1988.Sensorlose Und Spannungsgesteuerte Magnet- lager, Ph.D.Thesis.Zurich,Switzerland:ETHZurich

    1988

  7. [7]

    Self-SensingActiveMagneticLevi- tation

    D.Vischer,andH.Bleuler. “Self-SensingActiveMagneticLevi- tation.”IEEETransactionsonMagnetics29(1993):1276–1281

    1993

  8. [8]

    D. T. Montie 2003.Performance Limitations and Self-Sensing MagneticBearings, Ph.D.Thesis.Charlottesville,VA,USA:Uni- versityofVirginia

    2003

  9. [9]

    Self-SensingTechnologyofRotorDisplace- ment for Six-Pole Radial Active Magnetic Bearing Using Im- proved Quantum Particle Swarm Optimized Cubature Kalman Filter

    J.Sun,andH.Zhu. “Self-SensingTechnologyofRotorDisplace- ment for Six-Pole Radial Active Magnetic Bearing Using Im- proved Quantum Particle Swarm Optimized Cubature Kalman Filter.”IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics10(2022):2881–2889

    2022

  10. [10]

    A novel robust position estimator for self-sensing magnetic levi- tation systems based on least squares identification

    T. Glück, W. Kemmetmüller, C. Tump,, and A. Kugi. “A novel robust position estimator for self-sensing magnetic levi- tation systems based on least squares identification.”Control EngineeringPractice19,no.2(2011):146–157

    2011

  11. [11]

    Interconnec- tionanddampingassignmentpassivity-basedcontrol:asurvey

    A.Pyrkin,A.Vedyako,R.Ortega,,andA.Bobtsov. “Interconnec- tionanddampingassignmentpassivity-basedcontrol:asurvey.” InternationalJournalofControl93,no.7(2020):1619–1629

    2020

  12. [12]

    Advancements andChallengesinActiveMagneticBearings:AComprehensive Review of Performance, Control and Future Prospects

    D.Dutta,P.Biswa,S.Debnath,,andF.Ahmad. “Advancements andChallengesinActiveMagneticBearings:AComprehensive Review of Performance, Control and Future Prospects.”IEEE Access13(2025):3051–3071

    2025

  13. [13]

    An algebraic state observer for a class of physical systems

    A. Bobtsov, J.G. Romero, R. Ortega,, and A. Pyrkin. “An algebraic state observer for a class of physical systems.” . arXiv:2604.23142. (submitted)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Sastry, and M

    S. Sastry, and M. Bodson. 1989.Adaptive Control: Stability, ConvergenceandRobustness, NewJersey:Prentice-Hall

    1989

  15. [15]

    Non-linear estima- tion is easy

    M. Fliess, C. Join,, and H. Sira-Ramırez. “Non-linear estima- tion is easy.”International Journal of Modelling, Identification andControl4,no.1(2008):12–27

    2008

  16. [16]

    An alge- braic state observer for a batch reactor

    A. Bobtsov, A. Pyrkin, R. Ortega,, and J.G. Romero. “An alge- braic state observer for a batch reactor.” .Journal of Process Control. (submitted)

  17. [17]

    A robust asymptotic observer forsystemsthatconvergetounobservablestates.Abatchreactor case study

    A. Rapaport, and D. Dochain. “A robust asymptotic observer forsystemsthatconvergetounobservablestates.Abatchreactor case study.”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control65, no. 6 (2020):2693–2699

    2020

  18. [18]

    van der Schaft 2016.𝐿2–Gain and Passivity Techniques in NonlinearControl, Berlin:Springer

    A. van der Schaft 2016.𝐿2–Gain and Passivity Techniques in NonlinearControl, Berlin:Springer

    2016

  19. [19]

    Sensorlesscon- trol of IPMSM based on regression model

    J.Choi,K.Nam,A.A.Bobtsov,,andR.Ortega. “Sensorlesscon- trol of IPMSM based on regression model.”IEEE Transactions onPowerElectronics34,no.9(2019):9191–9201. APPENDIX A SwappingLemma[14,Lemma3.6.5] ConsidertheLTIfilter(3).Giventhesignals𝑤∶ℝ + →ℝ 𝑛×𝑚and 𝑣∶ℝ+ →ℝ 𝑚andthestableLTIfilter(3).Thefollowingidentity holdstrue ℱ[𝑤𝑣]=ℱ[𝑤]𝑣−ℱ [1 𝜆ℱ[𝑤]̇𝑣 ] .(A1) B Proof...

    2019