Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 118 references

Advancing Security with Digital Twins: A Comprehensive Survey

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that digital-twin technology can serve as a synchronized virtual-replica layer that gives electronics end-to-end traceability, continuous integrity verification, and safe attack simulation.

desk verdict A competent, useful survey of digital twins for hardware security, but the abstract overpromises what the reviewed systems actually deliver. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17310 v2 pith:B42CVJK3 submitted 2025-05-22 cs.CR cs.ET

Blessing Airehenbuwa , Touseef Hasan , Souvika Sarkar , Ujjwal Guin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CRcs.ET
keywords digitaltwinhardwaresecurityelectronicssupplychaincounterfeitdetectionintrusionside-channelanalysislargelanguagemodelscyber-physicalsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that digital twin technology can close gaps in hardware and electronics security by acting as a synchronized virtual replica of physical systems, offering end-to-end traceability, real-time monitoring, and safe what-if testing. It organizes recent work into four security fronts: cyber-physical systems, supply chains, IoT devices, and cryptographic systems, and adds a forward look at large language models inside twin frameworks. The authors' core case is that a unified, lifecycle-spanning twin can detect counterfeit components, intrusions, side-channel leakage, and thermal attacks that point solutions handle separately. A sympathetic reader should care because the paper supplies a single map of who has done what, which methods are still conceptual, and where the open gaps are.

What carries the argument

The digital twin itself is the load-bearing object: a dynamic virtual replica kept in sync with a physical system by sensor data flowing through a communication link, with decisions flowing back. The paper partitions twins into digital twin prototype (pre-manufacturing), digital twin instance (an individual product), and digital twin aggregate (a fleet-level composite), and pairs these with physics-based, data-driven, hybrid, or graphical modeling methods. This conceptual machinery does the work: it is what lets a twin support real-time monitoring, optimization, forecasting, and diagnosis, and what turns 'secure by simulation' into a lifecycle verification story. The LLM half of the survey adds a second mechanism: natural-language and code-generation models acting on twin data to automate assertion generation, scene description, and security reasoning.

What would settle it

Audit the Section IV studies against the paper's own definition: check whether each maintains a bidirectional, continuously updated link between the physical and virtual counterparts. If most use offline datasets or one-shot simulations with no lifecycle synchronization, the claimed promise and the technology-readiness ratings in Table II overstate how ready digital-twin security actually is.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the digital twin, defined as a living virtual replica that stays synchronized with its physical counterpart through continuous data flow, is a workable enabling layer for hardware security. It classifies twins into prototype, instance, and aggregate, and maps published security applications onto four domains: security analysis, intrusion detection, and policy generation for cyber-physical systems; root-cause analysis and counterfeit detection for supply chains; data privacy, threat detection, and security management for IoT; and side-channel and thermal analysis for cryptographic systems. Based on its comparative assessment, most current systems sit at medium technology readiness with experimental validation, while a subset remain conceptual, and scalability, real-world validation, and data-access barriers are the main bottlenecks. The paper also argues that large language models can strengthen twins through natural-language interaction, automated hardware code and assertion generation, and semantic communication, while cautioning about token limits and hallucination.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's synthesis assumes the papers it cites really build synchronized digital twins in the defined sense, not merely simulations or monitoring dashboards, and that their reported results are sound.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If digital twins mature as described, counterfeit integrated-circuit detection could shift from isolated inspection to continuous verification across the whole component lifecycle.
  • Cyber-physical system operators could run attack simulations and train security policies on a twin without risking live infrastructure.
  • IoT security could gain fine-grained data access control and adaptable threat detection despite the resource constraints of low-power devices.
  • Cryptographic hardware could be screened for side-channel and thermal leakage in a virtual environment before fabrication and deployment.
  • The survey's technology-readiness mapping implies that digital-twin security is mostly at the experimental stage, so near-term deployment claims should be treated as preliminary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A hidden risk is label inflation: works that use static simulation data or one-shot monitoring may not satisfy the synchronized-replica definition, so the readiness table should be read as an upper bound on field maturity.
  • A testable extension is to audit each cited system for bidirectional, continuously updated data flow, since the central promise rises or falls on real-time synchronization rather than on simulation alone.
  • The proposed LLM–twin convergence could be evaluated by adversarial prompting that checks whether models fabricate non-existent side-channel leakage paths when analyzing cryptographic twins.
  • The survey's unified scope suggests a practical benchmark: a shared cybersecurity twin dataset with standardized fidelity and technology-readiness metrics would let future work compare approaches directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys the application of digital twin (DT) technology to hardware and electronics security. It introduces DT definitions, history, types, and applications (Sections II–III), then reviews security use cases in cyber-physical systems, supply chain/counterfeit detection, IoT, and cryptographic systems (Section IV), followed by a discussion of large language model (LLM) integration with DTs (Section V), challenges and limitations (Section VI), research trends (Section VII), and conclusions. The paper positions itself as the first unified survey covering CPS, IoT, supply chain, and cryptosystems in a single study, and it provides a comparative assessment in Table II with accuracy figures and technology readiness level (TRL) ratings.

Significance. If its synthesis is reliable, this survey would offer a useful entry point for researchers working at the intersection of digital twins and hardware security, and the inclusion of LLM+DT prospects is a forward-looking contribution. Credit is due for several strengths: the paper is candid about the conceptual versus experimental nature of many works (Section IV.E, Section VII), it provides a clean DT taxonomy in Section II, and it attempts a cross-domain comparison that most prior surveys do not attempt. However, the significance is substantially limited by the small, non-systematic selection of works and by the lack of a rigorous check of each cited study against the paper's own DT definition, which directly affects the strength of the central generalization that DTs provide backward traceability, end-to-end visibility, and continuous verification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV.E and Table II] The TRL ratings in Table II overstate the maturity of the field because they are assigned without verifying that each cited work satisfies the three-component DT definition given in Section II.B (physical twin, virtual twin, and a bidirectional data/decision link). For example, [18] is explicitly a 'prospects and applications' position paper, [87] is a data-fusion concept ('Counterfeit Digital Twins'), [101] and [102] are conceptual frameworks, [100] appears to be an access-control and data-tagging scheme rather than a synchronized twin, and [107] is based on simulated power traces without a demonstrated live physical link. For these entries, a 'Medium' TRL (experimental validation) is not supported if the works are not actually DT implementations. Because the abstract's claim that DTs provide 'backward traceability, end-to-end visibility, and continuous verification' rests on these reviewed studies, the survey should either reclassify such entries or explicitly distinguish 'DT-enabled' implementations (satisfying all three components) from 'DT-inspired' simulations and concepts. This distinction is load-bearing for the paper's central claim.
  2. [Abstract and Section I] The repeated claim that this is a 'comprehensive' survey is not supported by a disclosed methodology. The paper does not state its search databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or time range, and the coverage is uneven: Section IV.C discusses only one paper under 'Data Privacy and Security' [100], and Section IV.D covers cryptographic systems with only two papers [88], [107]. For a paper that bills itself as a unified reference, this selection appears ad hoc. The authors should either weaken the 'comprehensive' framing or add a methodology subsection that explains and justifies the selection, for example by following a systematic-review protocol or by explicitly delimiting the scope and stating why the included papers are representative.
  3. [Section IV.E, Table II, 'Accuracy' column] The comparative accuracy figures (e.g., >83% for [95], 100% for [97], 99% for [100], >79% for [103]) are not comparable because no metric definition, evaluation protocol, or baseline is given for most rows. It is unclear whether these values refer to attack detection rate, classification accuracy, intrusion detection rate, or something else, and it is unclear on which dataset and against which alternative methods the comparison was made. Since the paper explicitly offers a 'comparative assessment', the authors should specify the metric and context for each row or move the accuracy numbers into the per-study narratives where their meaning can be described.
  4. [Section V.B.5] The section title and Figure 4 promise 'Integration of LLMs in DT Frameworks', but the security subsection (V.B.5) discusses LLM-based Verilog generation [116], hardware security assertion generation [117], and RTL syntax-error fixing [118] without demonstrating that these works are integrated into digital twin frameworks. As written, the text conflates LLMs for hardware security with LLMs inside DT frameworks. The authors should either clarify that these are prospective integrations for DT environments or cite actual LLM+DT security examples; otherwise the unified-treatment claim in Section V is weakened.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section I (last paragraph)] The sentence 'While prior surveys have focused on specific domains such as CPS [19], [20], or IoT applications [21].' is a sentence fragment and should be completed or merged with the following sentence.
  2. [References] References [2] and [99] appear to be the same book (Tehranipoor, Guin, and Forte, 'Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: Detection and Avoidance'); one of the two should be removed or distinguished.
  3. [Figure 2] The taxonomy diagram in Figure 2 is dense and the inner-ring labels are small; consider enlarging the fonts or splitting the taxonomy and the role/domain applications into two figures for legibility.
  4. [Section VII] The statement 'Since 2020, researchers in hardware security have begun exploring ... [18], [87], [94], [105], [107]' cites works with publication years ranging from 2020 to 2024; consider saying 'In the early 2020s' or listing the years explicitly to avoid the impression that all cited works are from 2020.
  5. [Section IV.C.2] The description of [101] as leveraging AI, digital twins, and blockchain is consistent with Table II, but the text does not note that this is a conceptual proposal; the TRL 'L' in Table II should be cross-referenced in the narrative to avoid a reader over-interpreting the description.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's central claim that digital twins are promising for hardware security is supported by external literature, not derived by construction from its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a literature survey, not a derivation. It makes no formal claim chain in which an output quantity is defined in terms of an input quantity, no parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness result is imported from the authors' own prior work to force a particular conclusion. The abstract's claim that digital twins provide backward traceability, end-to-end visibility, and continuous verification is presented as a synthesis of the reviewed literature and is supported by citations to numerous independent implementations and frameworks, including CPS intrusion detection, IoT security management, supply-chain counterfeit detection concepts, and side-channel analysis studies. The self-citations that appear (e.g., references [1], [2], [3], and [7]) are background citations for counterfeit IC threats and prior hardware-security work; they do not carry the survey's central claim that digital twins are a promising security solution, and they are not used to exclude alternative approaches. The skeptical concern that some Table II entries may be simulations or conceptual proposals rather than full digital twins under the Section II three-component definition is a question about evidence quality and technology-readiness classification, not circularity: the survey is not deriving its promise claim from those classifications, and the TRL labels are interpretive summaries of cited work rather than predictions fitted to the same data. No reduction of the kind the circularity check targets is present, so the honest finding is no significant circularity with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new parameters, entities, or derivations. Its claims rest on definitions of digital twins and on the accuracy of the surveyed literature, so the main epistemic load is the assumption that the cited works implement digital twins as claimed and that the selection of papers is representative.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Digital twins, as defined in Section II, have the real-time monitoring, simulation, and analysis properties attributed to them.
    The survey's central utility claim depends on these properties being accurate descriptions of actual systems; cited works may use the term loosely.
  • domain assumption The reviewed primary studies accurately represent digital twin deployments and their security outcomes.
    Table II relies on author-reported performance values, such as accuracy above 83 percent, 99 percent, and 100 percent, without independent verification, and several studies are marked conceptual with low TRL.
  • ad hoc to paper The selected references are representative of the field of digital twin security.
    No systematic literature search protocol is reported, so representativeness is asserted rather than demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advancing Security with Digital Twins: A Comprehensive Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B42CVJK3

@misc{pith2026250517310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advancing Security with Digital Twins: A Comprehensive Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B42CVJK3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17310}
}
read the original abstract

The proliferation of electronic devices has greatly transformed every aspect of human life, such as communication, healthcare, transportation, and energy. Unfortunately, the global electronics supply chain is vulnerable to various attacks, including piracy of intellectual properties, tampering, counterfeiting, information leakage, side-channel, and fault injection attacks, due to the complex nature of electronic products and vulnerabilities present in them. Although numerous solutions have been proposed to address these threats, significant gaps remain, particularly in providing scalable and comprehensive protection against emerging attacks. Digital twin, a dynamic virtual replica of a physical system, has emerged as a promising solution to address these issues by providing backward traceability, end-to-end visibility, and continuous verification of component integrity and behavior. In this paper, we comprehensively present the latest digital twin-based security implementations, including their role in cyber-physical systems, Internet of Things, cryptographic systems, detection of counterfeit electronics, intrusion detection, fault injection, and side-channel leakage. This work considers these critical security use cases within a single study to offer researchers and practitioners a unified reference for securing hardware with digital twins. The paper also explores the integration of large language models with digital twins for enhanced security and discusses current challenges, solutions, and future research directions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17310 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The conceptual diagram of a digital twin [46]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Digital Twin Taxonomy and Applications. • Digital twin instance (DTI) represents the digital counterpart of an individual manufactured product. It is created when the physical product rolls off the production line and is linked to its corresponding physical twin throughout its lifecycle. This connection allows for real-time synchronization and updates, enabling effective monitoring and management of the prod￾uct’s p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A taxonomy of applications of digital twins for enabling security. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Taxonomy of the integration of LLMs in DT frameworks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Major milestones in the development and adoption [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Digital Twin for Secure Semiconductor Lifecycle Management: Prospects and Applications

    H. A. Shaikh, M. B. Monjil, S. Chen, N. Asadizanjani, F. Farahmandi, M. Tehranipoor, and F. Rahman, “Digital twin for secure semiconductor lifecycle management: prospects and applications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10962, 2022

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  2. [87]

    Leveraging ai-enabled digital twins to combat counterfeit brands,

    J. Hornik and M. Rachamim, “Leveraging ai-enabled digital twins to combat counterfeit brands,”Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation, pp. 1–8, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [100]

    Edge centric secure data sharing with digital twins in smart ecosystems,

    G. Cathey, J. Benson, M. Gupta, and R. Sandhu, “Edge centric secure data sharing with digital twins in smart ecosystems,” inThird IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications, pp. 70–79, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [101]

    Data-aided intrusion detection systems: Leveraging ai, blockchain and digital twin technology,

    O. Alharbi, R. A. Shaikh, and R. Asif, “Data-aided intrusion detection systems: Leveraging ai, blockchain and digital twin technology,” in IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), pp. 8214–8215, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [102]

    Towards a novel framework for reinforcing cybersecurity using digital twins in iot-based healthcare ap- plications,

    S. Pirbhulal, H. Abie, and A. Shukla, “Towards a novel framework for reinforcing cybersecurity using digital twins in iot-based healthcare ap- plications,” inIEEE 95th Vehicular Technology Conference:(VTC2022- Spring), pp. 1–5, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [107]

    Experimental study of cryptographic algorithm based on digital twin technology side chan- nel leakage intelligent measurement and assessment,

    H. Yi, R. Lin, H. Song, C. Li, and X. Lin, “Experimental study of cryptographic algorithm based on digital twin technology side chan- nel leakage intelligent measurement and assessment,”Rev. Adhesion Adhesive, vol. 11, no. 25, pp. 856–880, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [88]

    Enhancing thermal security of 3d-sip systems through thermal digital twin (tdt),

    A. Z. Benelhaouare, A. Oukaira, M. Oumlaz, and A. Lakhssassi, “Enhancing thermal security of 3d-sip systems through thermal digital twin (tdt),” inIEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 20–24, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [95]

    Intrusion detection in digital twins for industrial control systems,

    F. Akbarian, E. Fitzgerald, and M. Kihl, “Intrusion detection in digital twins for industrial control systems,” inInternational Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, pp. 1–6, 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [97]

    Leveraging digital twins and intrusion detection systems for enhanced security in iot-based smart city infrastructures,

    M. El-Hajj, “Leveraging digital twins and intrusion detection systems for enhanced security in iot-based smart city infrastructures,”Electron- ics (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 19, p. 3941, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [103]

    Digital twin-empowered smart attack detection system for 6g edge of things networks,

    Y . Yigit, C. Chrysoulas, G. Yurdakul, L. Maglaras, and B. Canberk, “Digital twin-empowered smart attack detection system for 6g edge of things networks,” inIEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pp. 178–183, 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [116]

    Verigen: A large language model for verilog code generation,

    S. Thakur, B. Ahmad, H. Pearce, B. Tan, B. Dolan-Gavitt, R. Karri, and S. Garg, “Verigen: A large language model for verilog code generation,”ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Blessing Airehenbuwa (S’22)received his M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, USA, in 2024. He is cur- rently pursuin...

    work page 2024

  12. [117]

    Llm-assisted generation of hardware assertions,

    R. Kande, H. Pearce, B. Tan, B. Dolan-Gavitt, S. Thakur, R. Karri, and J. Rajendran, “Llm-assisted generation of hardware assertions,”arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv–2306, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [118]

    Rtlfixer: Automatically fixing rtl syntax errors with large language model,

    Y . Tsai, M. Liu, and H. Ren, “Rtlfixer: Automatically fixing rtl syntax errors with large language model,” inProceedings of the 61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, pp. 1–6, 2024. Souvika Sarkar (M’25)received her Ph.D. in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University in 2020. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Schoo...

    work page 2024

Show all 118 references
  1. [1]

    Anti-counterfeit techniques: From design to resign,

    U. Guin, D. Forte, and M. Tehranipoor, “Anti-counterfeit techniques: From design to resign,” inInternational workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification (MTV), pp. 89–94, 2013

    2013

  2. [2]

    Tehranipoor, U

    M. Tehranipoor, U. Guin, and D. Forte,Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: Detection and Avoidance. Springer International Publishing, 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: A Rising Threat in the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain,

    U. Guin, K. Huang, D. DiMase, J. M. Carulli, M. Tehranipoor, and Y . Makris, “Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: A Rising Threat in the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 1207–1228, 2014

    2014

  4. [4]

    Reward-based Blockchain Infrastructure for 3D IC Supply Chain Provenance,

    S. T. Valapu, A. Saha, B. Krishnamachari, V . Menon, and U. Guin, “Reward-based Blockchain Infrastructure for 3D IC Supply Chain Provenance,” into appear IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), pp. 1–11, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    A modular blockchain framework for enabling supply chain provenance,

    Y . Zhong, A. Ebrahim, U. Guin, and V . Menon, “A modular blockchain framework for enabling supply chain provenance,” inIEEE Physical Assurance and Inspection of Electronics (PAINE), pp. 1–7, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    A blockchain-based frame- work for supply chain provenance,

    P. Cui, J. Dixon, U. Guin, and D. DiMase, “A blockchain-based frame- work for supply chain provenance,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 157113– 157125, 2019

    2019

  7. [7]

    Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: Detection, Avoidance, and the Challenges Ahead,

    U. Guin, D. DiMase, and M. Tehranipoor, “Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: Detection, Avoidance, and the Challenges Ahead,”Journal of Electronic Testing, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 9–23, 2014

    2014

  8. [8]

    Hardware information flow tracking,

    W. Hu, A. Ardeshiricham, and R. Kastner, “Hardware information flow tracking,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1–39, 2021

    2021

  9. [9]

    Formal security verification of third party intellectual property cores for information leakage,

    J. Rajendran, A. M. Dhandayuthapany, V . Vedula, and R. Karri, “Formal security verification of third party intellectual property cores for information leakage,” in29th International conference on VLSI design and 2016 15th international conference on embedded systems, pp. 547–...

    2016

  10. [10]

    Beware of Discarding Used SRAMs: Information is Stored Permanently,

    J. Hovanes, Y . Zhong, and U. Guin, “Beware of Discarding Used SRAMs: Information is Stored Permanently,” inIEEE Physical As- surance and Inspection of Electronics (PAINE), pp. 1–7, 2022

    2022

  11. [11]

    Trustworthy hardware: Identifying and classifying hardware trojans,

    R. Karri, J. Rajendran, K. Rosenfeld, and M. Tehranipoor, “Trustworthy hardware: Identifying and classifying hardware trojans,”Computer, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 39–46, 2010

    2010

  12. [12]

    Survey of Recent Developments for Hardware Trojan Detection,

    A. Jain, Z. Zhou, and U. Guin, “Survey of Recent Developments for Hardware Trojan Detection,” inIEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp. 1–5, 2021

    2021

  13. [13]

    Integrated circuit authen- tication,

    M. Tehranipoor, H. Salmani, and X. Zhang, “Integrated circuit authen- tication,”Switzerland: Springer, Cham. doi, vol. 10, pp. 978–3, 2014

    2014

  14. [14]

    Differential power analysis,

    P. Kocher, J. Jaffe, and B. Jun, “Differential power analysis,” inAd- vances in Cryptology—CRYPTO’99: 19th Annual International Cryp- tology Conference Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 15–19, 1999 Proceedings 19, pp. 388–397, Springer, 1999

    1999

  15. [15]

    Introduction to side-channel attacks,

    F.-X. Standaert, “Introduction to side-channel attacks,”Secure inte- grated circuits and systems, pp. 27–42, 2010

    2010

  16. [16]

    Leakage assessment methodology: A clear roadmap for side-channel evaluations,

    T. Schneider and A. Moradi, “Leakage assessment methodology: A clear roadmap for side-channel evaluations,” inCryptographic Hard- ware and Embedded Systems–CHES 2015: 17th International Work- shop, Saint-Malo, France, September 13-16, 2015, Proceedings 17, pp. 495–513, Springer, 2015

    2015

  17. [17]

    Introduction to hardware security,

    Y . Jin, “Introduction to hardware security,”Electronics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 763–784, 2015

    2015

  18. [19]

    Digital twins for cyber-physical systems security: State of the art and outlook,

    M. Eckhart and A. Ekelhart, “Digital twins for cyber-physical systems security: State of the art and outlook,”Security and Quality in Cyber- Physical Systems Engineering: With Forewords by Robert M. Lee and Tom Gilb, pp. 383–412, 2019

    2019

  19. [20]

    Digital twin for cybersecurity incident prediction: A multivocal literature review,

    A. Pokhrel, V . Katta, and R. Colomo-Palacios, “Digital twin for cybersecurity incident prediction: A multivocal literature review,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd international conference on soft- ware engineering workshops, pp. 671–678, 2020

    2020

  20. [21]

    Systematic literature review: Digital twins’ role in enhancing security for industry 4.0 applications,

    M. El-Hajj, T. It ¨apelto, and T. Gebremariam, “Systematic literature review: Digital twins’ role in enhancing security for industry 4.0 applications,”Security and Privacy, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e396, 2024. 14

    2024

  21. [22]

    Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective,

    A. Rasheed, O. San, and T. Kvamsdal, “Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective,”IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 21980–22012, 2020

    2020

  22. [23]

    The role of ai, machine learning, and big data in digital twinning: A systematic literature review, challenges, and opportunities,

    M. M. Rathore, S. A. Shah, D. Shukla, E. Bentafat, and S. Bakiras, “The role of ai, machine learning, and big data in digital twinning: A systematic literature review, challenges, and opportunities,”IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 32030–32052, 2021

    2021

  23. [24]

    Blockchain-based data management for digital twin of product,

    S. Huang, G. Wang, Y . Yan, and X. Fang, “Blockchain-based data management for digital twin of product,”Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 54, pp. 361–371, 2020

    2020

  24. [25]

    Ethertwin: Blockchain- based secure digital twin information management,

    B. Putz, M. Dietz, P. Empl, and G. Pernul, “Ethertwin: Blockchain- based secure digital twin information management,”Information pro- cessing & management, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 102425, 2021

    2021

  25. [26]

    On the design of a privacy-preserving communication scheme for cloud-based digital twin environments using blockchain,

    S. Son, D. Kwon, J. Lee, S. Yu, N.-S. Jho, and Y . Park, “On the design of a privacy-preserving communication scheme for cloud-based digital twin environments using blockchain,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 75365– 75375, 2022

    2022

  26. [27]

    Unlocking hardware security assurance: The potential of llms,

    X. Meng, A. Srivastava, A. Arunachalam, A. Ray, P. H. Silva, R. Psi- akis, Y . Makris, and K. Basu, “Unlocking hardware security assurance: The potential of llms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11042, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  27. [28]

    Llm4sechw: Lever- aging domain-specific large language model for hardware debugging,

    W. Fu, K. Yang, R. G. Dutta, X. Guo, and G. Qu, “Llm4sechw: Lever- aging domain-specific large language model for hardware debugging,” inAsian Hardware Oriented Security and Trust Symposium, pp. 1–6, 2023

    2023

  28. [29]

    Digital twin- driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data,

    F. Tao, J. Cheng, Q. Qi, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, and F. Sui, “Digital twin- driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data,”The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 94, pp. 3563–3576, 2018

    2018

  29. [30]

    The digital twin paradigm for future nasa and us air force vehicles,

    E. Glaessgen and D. Stargel, “The digital twin paradigm for future nasa and us air force vehicles,” in53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference, p. 1818, 2012

    2012

  30. [31]

    Grieves,Virtually perfect: driving innovative and lean products through product lifecycle management, vol

    M. Grieves,Virtually perfect: driving innovative and lean products through product lifecycle management, vol. 11. Space Coast Press Cocoa Beach, 2011

    2011

  31. [32]

    Product lifecycle management: driving the next generation of lean thinking,

    M. Grieves, “Product lifecycle management: driving the next generation of lean thinking,”(No Title), 2006

    2006

  32. [33]

    Design a digital twin sensors system using cgan-lstm for greenhouse climate control,

    M. K. A. Madjid, S. Noureddine, B. Amina, B. Khelifa, A. Sofiane, and C. Ahmed, “Design a digital twin sensors system using cgan-lstm for greenhouse climate control,” in4th International Conference on Embedded & Distributed Systems (EDiS), pp. 132–136, 2024

    2024

  33. [34]

    Introducing digi- tal twins to agriculture,

    C. Pylianidis, S. Osinga, and I. N. Athanasiadis, “Introducing digi- tal twins to agriculture,”Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 184, p. 105942, 2021

    2021

  34. [35]

    Agrilora: a digital twin framework for smart agriculture.,

    P. Angin, M. H. Anisi, F. G ¨oksel, C. G ¨ursoy, and A. B ¨uy¨ukg¨ulc¨u, “Agrilora: a digital twin framework for smart agriculture.,”J. Wirel. Mob. Networks Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 77–96, 2020

    2020

  35. [36]

    A novel cloud-based framework for the elderly healthcare services using digital twin,

    Y . Liu, L. Zhang, Y . Yang, L. Zhou, L. Ren, F. Wang, R. Liu, Z. Pang, and M. J. Deen, “A novel cloud-based framework for the elderly healthcare services using digital twin,”IEEE access, vol. 7, pp. 49088– 49101, 2019

    2019

  36. [37]

    A digital-twin-assisted fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning,

    Y . Xu, Y . Sun, X. Liu, and Y . Zheng, “A digital-twin-assisted fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning,”Ieee Access, vol. 7, pp. 19990– 19999, 2019

    2019

  37. [38]

    Deep digital twins for detection, diagnostics and prognostics,

    W. Booyse, D. N. Wilke, and S. Heyns, “Deep digital twins for detection, diagnostics and prognostics,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 140, p. 106612, 2020

    2020

  38. [39]

    Digital twin in healthcare: What it is, what it does,

    V . Ankitha, “Digital twin in healthcare: What it is, what it does,” Sept. 12 2024. [Online]. Available: https://toobler.com/blog/digital- twin-in-healthcare

    2024

  39. [40]

    Apollo 13: The first digital twin,

    S. Ferguson, “Apollo 13: The first digital twin,” April 2020. [On- line]. Available: https://blogs.sw.siemens.com/simcenter/apollo-13-the- first-digital-twin

    2020

  40. [41]

    Digital twins and living models at nasa,

    B. D. Allen, “Digital twins and living models at nasa,” inDigital Twin Summit, 2021

    2021

  41. [42]

    Technology area 12: Materials, structures, mechanical systems, and manufacturing road map,

    R. Piascik, J. Vickers, D. Lowry, S. Scotti, J. Stewart, and A. Calomino, “Technology area 12: Materials, structures, mechanical systems, and manufacturing road map,”NASA Office of Chief Technologist, pp. 15– 88, 2010

    2010

  42. [43]

    Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin,

    E. J. Tuegel, A. R. Ingraffea, T. G. Eason, and S. M. Spottswood, “Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2011, no. 1, p. 154798, 2011

    2011

  43. [44]

    Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems,

    M. Grieves and J. Vickers, “Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems,”Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems: New findings and approaches, pp. 85–113, 2017

    2017

  44. [45]

    Digital twins: past, present, and future,

    M. W. Grieves, “Digital twins: past, present, and future,” inThe digital twin, pp. 97–121, Springer, 2023

    2023

  45. [46]

    Science & Tech Spotlight: Digital Twins—Virtual Models of People and Objects,

    B. Bothwell, “Science & Tech Spotlight: Digital Twins—Virtual Models of People and Objects,” Tech. Rep. GAO-23-106453, U.S. Government Accountability Office, feb 2023. Published and Publicly Released: Feb 14, 2023

    2023

  46. [47]

    Design, modeling and implementa- tion of digital twins,

    M. Segovia and J. Garcia-Alfaro, “Design, modeling and implementa- tion of digital twins,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 14, p. 5396, 2022

    2022

  47. [48]

    Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and envi- ronmental systems,

    J. Willard, X. Jia, S. Xu, M. Steinbach, and V . Kumar, “Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and envi- ronmental systems,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1–37, 2022

    2022

  48. [49]

    A probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale,

    M. G. Kapteyn, J. V . Pretorius, and K. E. Willcox, “A probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale,”Nature Computational Science, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 337–347, 2021

    2021

  49. [50]

    Digital twins: A survey on enabling technologies, challenges, trends and future prospects,

    S. Mihai, M. Yaqoob, D. V . Hung, W. Davis, P. Towakel, M. Raza, M. Karamanoglu, B. Barn, D. Shetve, R. V . Prasad,et al., “Digital twins: A survey on enabling technologies, challenges, trends and future prospects,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2...

    2022

  50. [51]

    Digital twin for battery systems: Cloud battery management system with online state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation,

    W. Li, M. Rentemeister, J. Badeda, D. J ¨ost, D. Schulte, and D. U. Sauer, “Digital twin for battery systems: Cloud battery management system with online state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation,”Journal of energy storage, vol. 30, p. 101557, 2020

    2020

  51. [52]

    Data- driven digital twins for monitoring the health and performance of con- verters,

    Y . Li, B. Bohara, H. S. Krishnamoorthy, and J. Seshadrinath, “Data- driven digital twins for monitoring the health and performance of con- verters,” inIEEE International Communications Energy Conference, pp. 1–6, 2024

    2024

  52. [53]

    Digital twin workshop: a new paradigm for future workshop,

    F. Tao, M. Zhang, J. Cheng, and Q. Qi, “Digital twin workshop: a new paradigm for future workshop,”Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017

    2017

  53. [54]

    Case study for design optimization using the digital twin approach,

    F. Bellalouna, “Case study for design optimization using the digital twin approach,”Procedia CIRP, vol. 100, pp. 595–600, 2021

    2021

  54. [55]

    The use of digital twin for predictive maintenance in manufacturing,

    P. Aivaliotis, K. Georgoulias, and G. Chryssolouris, “The use of digital twin for predictive maintenance in manufacturing,”International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 32, pp. 1067– 1080, 2019

    2019

  55. [56]

    The design of a digital-twin for predictive maintenance,

    S. Centomo, N. Dall’Ora, and F. Fummi, “The design of a digital-twin for predictive maintenance,” in25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, vol. 1, pp. 1781–1788, 2020

    2020

  56. [57]

    Digital twin–driven aero- engine intelligent predictive maintenance,

    M. Xiong, H. Wang, Q. Fu, and Y . Xu, “Digital twin–driven aero- engine intelligent predictive maintenance,”The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 114, pp. 3751–3761, 2021

    2021

  57. [58]

    A digital twin approach for fault diagnosis in distributed photovoltaic systems,

    P. Jain, J. Poon, J. P. Singh, C. Spanos, S. R. Sanders, and S. K. Panda, “A digital twin approach for fault diagnosis in distributed photovoltaic systems,”IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 940–956, 2019

    2019

  58. [59]

    Monitoring and control systems in agriculture using intelligent sensor techniques: A review of the aeroponic system,

    I. A. Lakhiar, G. Jianmin, T. N. Syed, F. A. Chandio, N. A. Buttar, and W. A. Qureshi, “Monitoring and control systems in agriculture using intelligent sensor techniques: A review of the aeroponic system,” Journal of sensors, vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 8672769, 2018

    2018

  59. [60]

    Dynamical approach for real-time monitoring of agricultural crops,

    F. Vicente-Guijalba, T. Martinez-Marin, and J. M. Lopez-Sanchez, “Dynamical approach for real-time monitoring of agricultural crops,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 3278–3293, 2014

    2014

  60. [61]

    Digital twin for the future of orchard production systems,

    P. Moghadam, T. Lowe, and E. J. Edwards, “Digital twin for the future of orchard production systems,” inProceedings, vol. 36, p. 92, MDPI, 2020

    2020

  61. [62]

    A digital twin architecture to optimize productivity within controlled environment agriculture,

    J. D. Chaux, D. Sanchez-Londono, and G. Barbieri, “A digital twin architecture to optimize productivity within controlled environment agriculture,”Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 19, p. 8875, 2021

    2021

  62. [63]

    The use of high-performance fatigue mechanics and the extended kalman/particle filters, for diagnostics and prognostics of aircraft struc- tures,

    H.-K. Wang, R. Haynes, H.-Z. Huang, L. Dong, and S. N. Atluri, “The use of high-performance fatigue mechanics and the extended kalman/particle filters, for diagnostics and prognostics of aircraft struc- tures,”Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1...

    2015

  63. [64]

    Digital system and method for managing a wind farm having plurality of wind turbines coupled to power grid,

    A. M. Lund, K. Mochel, J.-W. Lin, R. Onetto, J. Srinivasan, P. Gregg, J. E. Bergman, K. D. Hartling, A. Ahmed, S. Chotai,et al., “Digital system and method for managing a wind farm having plurality of wind turbines coupled to power grid,” Nov. 20 2018. US Patent 10,132,295

    2018

  64. [65]

    Digital twin models of power electronic converters using dynamic neural networks,

    A. Wunderlich and E. Santi, “Digital twin models of power electronic converters using dynamic neural networks,” inIEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), pp. 2369–2376, 2021. 15

    2021

  65. [66]

    On the implementation of iot-based digital twin for networked microgrids resiliency against cyber attacks,

    A. Saad, S. Faddel, T. Youssef, and O. A. Mohammed, “On the implementation of iot-based digital twin for networked microgrids resiliency against cyber attacks,”IEEE transactions on smart grid, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 5138–5150, 2020

    2020

  66. [67]

    Iot-based digital twin for energy cyber-physical systems: design and implementation,

    A. Saad, S. Faddel, and O. Mohammed, “Iot-based digital twin for energy cyber-physical systems: design and implementation,”Energies, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 4762, 2020

    2020

  67. [68]

    Digital twin and its application in power system,

    H. Pan, Z. Dou, Y . Cai, W. Li, X. Lei, and D. Han, “Digital twin and its application in power system,” in5th International Conference on Power and Renewable Energy (ICPRE), pp. 21–26, 2020

    2020

  68. [69]

    Parameter tuning for dynamic digital twins in inverter-dominated distribution grid,

    X. Song, T. Jiang, S. Schlegel, and D. Westermann, “Parameter tuning for dynamic digital twins in inverter-dominated distribution grid,”IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 811–821, 2020

    2020

  69. [70]

    Data-centric hierarchical distributed model predictive control for smart grid energy management,

    A. Saad, T. Youssef, A. T. Elsayed, A. Amin, O. H. Abdalla, and O. Mohammed, “Data-centric hierarchical distributed model predictive control for smart grid energy management,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 4086–4098, 2018

    2018

  70. [71]

    The digital twin revolution in healthcare,

    T. Erol, A. F. Mendi, and D. Do ˘gan, “The digital twin revolution in healthcare,” in4th international symposium on multidisciplinary studies and innovative technologies, pp. 1–7, 2020

    2020

  71. [72]

    Exploring the revolution in healthcare systems through the applications of digital twin technology,

    A. Haleem, M. Javaid, R. P. Singh, and R. Suman, “Exploring the revolution in healthcare systems through the applications of digital twin technology,”Biomedical Technology, vol. 4, pp. 28–38, 2023

    2023

  72. [73]

    Digital twin empowered wireless healthcare monitoring for smart home,

    J. Chen, W. Wang, B. Fang, Y . Liu, K. Yu, V . C. Leung, and X. Hu, “Digital twin empowered wireless healthcare monitoring for smart home,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 3662–3676, 2023

    2023

  73. [74]

    A blockchain-enabled secure digital twin framework for early botnet detection in iiot environment,

    M. M. Salim, A. K. Comivi, T. Nurbek, H. Park, and J. H. Park, “A blockchain-enabled secure digital twin framework for early botnet detection in iiot environment,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 16, p. 6133, 2022

    2022

  74. [75]

    Cyberfactory# 1—securing the industry 4.0 with cyber-ranges and digital twins,

    A. Becue, Y . Fourastier, I. Prac ¸a, A. Savarit, C. Baron, B. Gradussofs, E. Pouille, and C. Thomas, “Cyberfactory# 1—securing the industry 4.0 with cyber-ranges and digital twins,” in14th IEEE international workshop on factory communication systems (WFCS), pp. 1–4, 2018

    2018

  75. [76]

    A framework for an indoor safety management system based on digital twin,

    Z. Liu, A. Zhang, and W. Wang, “A framework for an indoor safety management system based on digital twin,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 20, p. 5771, 2020

    2020

  76. [77]

    Dig- ital twin for safety and security: Perspectives on building lifecycle,

    S. H. Khajavi, M. Tetik, Z. Liu, P. Korhonen, and J. Holmstr ¨om, “Dig- ital twin for safety and security: Perspectives on building lifecycle,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 52339–52356, 2023

    2023

  77. [78]

    Re-design of smart homes with digital twins,

    V . Gopinath, A. Srija, and C. N. Sravanthi, “Re-design of smart homes with digital twins,” inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1228, p. 012031, IOP Publishing, 2019

    2019

  78. [79]

    A digital twin architecture model applied with mlops techniques to improve short-term energy consumption prediction,

    T. Y . Fujii, V . T. Hayashi, R. Arakaki, W. V . Ruggiero, R. Bulla Jr, F. H. Hayashi, and K. A. Khalil, “A digital twin architecture model applied with mlops techniques to improve short-term energy consumption prediction,”Machines, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 23, 2021

    2021

  79. [80]

    A novel digital twin-centric approach for driver intention prediction and traffic congestion avoidance,

    S. A. Kumar, R. Madhumathi, P. R. Chelliah, L. Tao, and S. Wang, “A novel digital twin-centric approach for driver intention prediction and traffic congestion avoidance,”Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environ- ments, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 199–209, 2018

    2018

  80. [81]

    Reinforcement learning-based energy management system enhancement using digital twin for electric vehicles,

    Y . Ye, B. Xu, J. Zhang, B. Lawler, and B. Ayalew, “Reinforcement learning-based energy management system enhancement using digital twin for electric vehicles,” inIEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), pp. 1–6, 2022

    2022

  81. [82]

    Health monitoring and prognosis of electric vehicle motor using intelligent-digital twin,

    S. Venkatesan, K. Manickavasagam, N. Tengenkai, and N. Vijayalak- shmi, “Health monitoring and prognosis of electric vehicle motor using intelligent-digital twin,”IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1328–1335, 2019

    2019

  82. [83]

    A digital twin in trans- portation: Real-time synergy of traffic data streams and simulation for virtualizing motorway dynamics,

    K. Ku ˇsi´c, R. Schumann, and E. Ivanjko, “A digital twin in trans- portation: Real-time synergy of traffic data streams and simulation for virtualizing motorway dynamics,”Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 55, p. 101858, 2023

    2023

  83. [84]

    Detec- tion of malicious node in vanets using digital twin,

    V . Arya, A. Gaurav, B. B. Gupta, C.-H. Hsu, and H. Baghban, “Detec- tion of malicious node in vanets using digital twin,” inInternational Conference on Big Data Intelligence and Computing, pp. 204–212, Springer, 2022

    2022

  84. [85]

    Tesla’s digital twins,

    M. Kalil, “Tesla’s digital twins,” March 2024. [Online]. Available: https://mikekalil.com/blog/tesla-digital-twins/

    2024

  85. [86]

    Towards security-aware virtual environ- ments for digital twins,

    M. Eckhart and A. Ekelhart, “Towards security-aware virtual environ- ments for digital twins,” inProceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on cyber-physical system security, pp. 61–72, 2018

    2018

  86. [89]

    Augmented reality and the digital twin: State-of-the-art and perspectives for cybersecurity,

    F. B ¨ohm, M. Dietz, T. Preindl, and G. Pernul, “Augmented reality and the digital twin: State-of-the-art and perspectives for cybersecurity,” Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 519–538, 2021

    2021

  87. [90]

    Explain- able ai for cybersecurity automation, intelligence and trustworthiness in digital twin: Methods, taxonomy, challenges and prospects,

    I. H. Sarker, H. Janicke, A. Mohsin, A. Gill, and L. Maglaras, “Explain- able ai for cybersecurity automation, intelligence and trustworthiness in digital twin: Methods, taxonomy, challenges and prospects,”ICT Express, 2024

    2024

  88. [91]

    Digital twins for security automation,

    K. Hammar and R. Stadler, “Digital twins for security automation,” in IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, pp. 1–6, 2023

    2023

  89. [92]

    Unleashing the digital twin’s potential for ics security,

    M. Dietz and G. Pernul, “Unleashing the digital twin’s potential for ics security,”IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 20–27, 2020

    2020

  90. [93]

    Real-time digital twin of residential energy storage system for cyber-security study,

    A. B. Shitole, N. K. Kandasamy, L. S. Liew, L. Sim, and A. K. Bui, “Real-time digital twin of residential energy storage system for cyber-security study,” inIEEE 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies for Power, Energy and Control, pp. 1–6, 2021

    2021

  91. [94]

    Integrating digital twin security simulations in the security operations center,

    M. Dietz, M. Vielberth, and G. Pernul, “Integrating digital twin security simulations in the security operations center,” inProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 1–9, 2020

    2020

  92. [96]

    Digital twin-based cyber-attack detection framework for cyber-physical man- ufacturing systems,

    E. C. Balta, M. Pease, J. Moyne, K. Barton, and D. M. Tilbury, “Digital twin-based cyber-attack detection framework for cyber-physical man- ufacturing systems,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1695–1712, 2023

    2023

  93. [98]

    A digital twin based industrial au- tomation and control system security architecture,

    C. Gehrmann and M. Gunnarsson, “A digital twin based industrial au- tomation and control system security architecture,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 669–680, 2019

    2019

  94. [99]

    M. M. Tehranipoor, U. Guin, and D. Forte,Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: Detection and Avoidance. Springer International Publishing, 2015

    2015

  95. [104]

    Soar4iot: securing iot assets with digital twins,

    P. Empl, D. Schlette, D. Zupfer, and G. Pernul, “Soar4iot: securing iot assets with digital twins,” inProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 1–10, 2022

    2022

  96. [105]

    Digital twins for iot security management,

    P. Empl, H. Hager, and G. Pernul, “Digital twins for iot security management,” inIFIP Annual Conference on Data and Applications Security and Privacy, pp. 141–149, Springer, 2023

    2023

  97. [106]

    Secure and efficient web of things digital twins using permissioned blockchains,

    I. Pittaras and G. C. Polyzos, “Secure and efficient web of things digital twins using permissioned blockchains,” in7th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), pp. 1–5, 2022

    2022

  98. [108]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  99. [109]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologi...

    2019

  100. [110]

    Gpt-4 technical report,

    J. Achiam, S. Adler, S. Agarwal, L. Ahmad, I. Akkaya, F. L. Aleman, D. Almeida, J. Altenschmidt, S. Altman, S. Anadkat,et al., “Gpt-4 technical report,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  101. [111]

    A comprehensive overview of large language models,

    H. Naveed, A. U. Khan, S. Qiu, M. Saqib, S. Anwar, M. Usman, N. Akhtar, N. Barnes, and A. Mian, “A comprehensive overview of large language models,”ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1–72, 2025

    2025

  102. [112]

    Twin-gpt: digital twins for clinical trials via large language model,

    Y . Wang, T. Fu, Y . Xu, Z. Ma, H. Xu, B. Du, Y . Lu, H. Gao, J. Wu, and J. Chen, “Twin-gpt: digital twins for clinical trials via large language model,”ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 2024

    2024

  103. [113]

    An llm-based digital twin for optimizing human-in-the loop systems,

    H. Yang, M. Siew, and C. Joe-Wong, “An llm-based digital twin for optimizing human-in-the loop systems,” inIEEE International Work- shop on Foundation Models for Cyber-Physical Systems & Internet of Things, pp. 26–31, 2024

    2024

  104. [114]

    Chattwin: toward automated digital twin generation for data center via large language models,

    M. Li, R. Wang, X. Zhou, Z. Zhu, Y . Wen, and R. Tan, “Chattwin: toward automated digital twin generation for data center via large language models,” inACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, pp. 208–211, 2023

    2023

  105. [115]

    Llm-twin: mini-giant model-driven beyond 5g digital twin networking framework with semantic secure communication and computation,

    Y . Hong, J. Wu, and R. Morello, “Llm-twin: mini-giant model-driven beyond 5g digital twin networking framework with semantic secure communication and computation,”Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 19065, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.