Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Signed-Prompt: A New Approach to Prevent Prompt Injection Attacks Against LLM-Integrated Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.07612 v1 pith:BDWUEWPW submitted 2024-01-15 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords promptattacksinjectionsigned-promptapplicationsllmsdefenseincluding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The critical challenge of prompt injection attacks in Large Language Models (LLMs) integrated applications, a growing concern in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) field. Such attacks, which manipulate LLMs through natural language inputs, pose a significant threat to the security of these applications. Traditional defense strategies, including output and input filtering, as well as delimiter use, have proven inadequate. This paper introduces the 'Signed-Prompt' method as a novel solution. The study involves signing sensitive instructions within command segments by authorized users, enabling the LLM to discern trusted instruction sources. The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of prompt injection attack patterns, followed by a detailed explanation of the Signed-Prompt concept, including its basic architecture and implementation through both prompt engineering and fine-tuning of LLMs. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the Signed-Prompt method, showing substantial resistance to various types of prompt injection attacks, thus validating its potential as a robust defense strategy in AI security.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Synonymous Variational Perspective on the Rate-Distortion-Perception Tradeoff

    cs.IT 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Synset-based reconstruction and synonymous variational inference are claimed to derive the distributional divergence in RDP and unify it with classical rate-distortion theory.

  2. Quantifying Conversation Drift in MCP via Latent Polytope

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SecMCP flags MCP conversation drift by thresholding per-layer activation distances from benign anchors, reporting AUROC above 0.915 on Llama3, Vicuna, and Mistral.

  3. Red Teaming the Mind of the Machine: A Systematic Evaluation of Prompt Injection and Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in LLMs

    cs.CR 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A claimed systematic jailbreak evaluation across four LLMs reports 69-87% attack success rates and high cross-model transferability, but provides no artifacts to support the numbers.

  4. LLM Security: Vulnerabilities, Attacks, Defenses, and Countermeasures

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    This survey categorizes attacks on large language models by lifecycle phase and maps them to prevention and detection defenses, concluding that only a few defenses are highly effective.

Pith tools