Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 18 references

Super-Eddington Seyfert cores can accelerate hadrons near the black hole and produce 10–100 TeV neutrinos while winds hide the gamma rays.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 01:35 UTC pith:BGPEAD2D

load-bearing objection Solid super-Eddington hidden-core neutrino scenario with standard cascade physics; detectability is real only for the optimistic magnetization branch and is set by one free flux normalization. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03559 v1 pith:BGPEAD2D submitted 2026-07-03 astro-ph.HE

Neutrinos from super-Eddington Seyfert galaxies

Lucas M. Pasquevich , Gustavo E. Romero , Mat\'ias M. Reynoso This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrinossuper-Eddington accretionSeyfert galaxiesmagnetic reconnectionhidden sourcesNGC 7469pγ interactionsmulti-messenger astronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that when an active galactic nucleus accretes above the Eddington rate, the inner disk becomes thick and magnetized, and magnetic reconnection in a compact funnel near the black hole can accelerate protons to PeV energies. Those protons collide with the intense thermal photon field of the supercritical disk and produce neutrinos that peak around 10–100 TeV and can reach Earth at levels accessible to IceCube or KM3NeT. The same radiation-driven wind that surrounds the funnel absorbs the accompanying gamma rays, so the source looks bright in neutrinos and faint or silent in high-energy photons. The authors apply the picture to the nearby Seyfert NGC 7469 and show that a moderately magnetized super-Eddington configuration can match the two reported ~100 TeV neutrino events while remaining consistent with the lack of gamma-ray detection. The result supplies a concrete physical setting for “hidden” neutrino sources among radio-quiet Seyferts and transient super-Eddington episodes such as tidal disruptions.

Core claim

Cores of super-Eddington AGN accelerate hadrons by magnetic reconnection inside a magnetically confined funnel close to the supermassive black hole; photomeson interactions with the supercritical disk photon field then yield a neutrino flux peaking at 10–100 TeV that can be detectable, while the surrounding radiation-driven wind strongly attenuates the accompanying gamma rays, turning these systems into hidden neutrino sources.

What carries the argument

Magnetic reconnection in a compact, magnetically confined funnel (z_acc ~ 10 r_g) inside the supercritical disk, with non-thermal power set to 10 percent of the local magnetic power; protons then cool mainly by pγ on disk photons and produce the escaping neutrinos.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic flux near the black hole is taken to be only about one percent of the magnetically arrested value, which sets the entire magnetic power and therefore the whole non-thermal proton budget.

What would settle it

A multi-year IceCube or KM3NeT non-detection of muon-neutrino excess from NGC 7469 (or a larger sample of confirmed super-Eddington Seyferts) at the flux level predicted for the moderate-magnetization model would rule out the claimed detectability.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that super-Eddington AGN cores can act as hidden high-energy neutrino sources. In a supercritical disk (Fukue/Akizuki-style) with radiation-driven winds, a compact magnetically confined reconnection layer near the SMBH (z_acc ~ 10 r_g) accelerates protons to ~1–10 PeV. These protons interact mainly via pγ with the intense disk photon field, producing a neutrino spectrum that peaks at ~10–100 TeV (with a secondary kaon contribution at higher energies). The same dense wind and disk radiation fields strongly attenuate the accompanying γ-rays through γγ and γN absorption, so the source can appear bright in neutrinos while remaining faint at VHE γ-rays. Two representative models (weakly super-Eddington/low magnetization A and moderately magnetized B) are computed with standard one-zone transport, secondary pion/muon/kaon chains, and opacity calculations; model B yields IceCube/KM3NeT-relevant rates at 60 Mpc. The framework is then applied to NGC 7469 (ṁ ~ 10, low inclination), where a moderately magnetized configuration with Γ = 2 or 1.5 can produce a ~0.4 PeV-peaked flux compatible with the two reported ~100 TeV IceCube events while suppressing GeV–TeV γ-rays.

Significance. If the normalization holds, the work supplies a concrete, observationally motivated channel for the neutrino–γ-ray mismatch seen in Seyferts (NGC 1068 and candidates such as NGC 7469) that does not require a standard hot corona. It links super-Eddington disk structure, radiation-driven winds, and magnetic reconnection in a single multimessenger picture, and it makes falsifiable statements about spectral peak energy (~10–100 TeV), proton-synchrotron radio signatures, and the role of transient super-Eddington episodes (TDEs). The cooling rates, secondary cascades, and γγ/γN opacities follow standard, well-documented formulas and are presented with clear figures; the application to a specific source with reported events is a useful concrete test. The main limitation is that the absolute flux scale is set by a stack of free efficiencies rather than by a first-principles or observationally fixed power budget.

major comments (3)
  1. The absolute neutrino luminosity (and therefore the detectability claims for model B and for NGC 7469) is controlled by L_rel = 0.1 L_mag (Eq. 18) with L_mag set by B at z_acc. B itself (Eq. 9) and the magnetized zone size r_mag (Eq. 5) are fixed by the single choice Φ ≃ 0.01 Φ_MAD (Eq. 7), motivated only by a radio-loud/radio-quiet luminosity contrast of 10^3–10^4 and B^2 synchrotron scaling. Because L_ν scales linearly with L_p ∝ B^2, a factor-of-a-few smaller Φ collapses the event rates in Table 3 by 1–2 orders of magnitude. The paper should either (i) provide a stronger physical or simulation-based justification for Φ/Φ_MAD ~ 0.01 in radio-quiet super-Eddington flows, or (ii) present an explicit sensitivity scan over Φ (and over the 10 % reconnection efficiency) so that the reader can see for which range of parameters the “may be detectable / can account for” statements remain valid.
  2. For NGC 7469 the authors adopt Γ = 1.5 (in addition to Γ = 2) because IceCube reports a hard index ~1.9, and they lower n_i to raise σ_gas accordingly (Table 4 and §6). While exploring a harder injection spectrum is legitimate, the text should make clear that this choice is data-driven rather than predicted by the reconnection model, and should show how the predicted flux and event rate change when Γ is kept at the value used for the generic models (Γ = 2). Without that, the statement that the model “can account for” the two events risks appearing tuned.
  3. The assumption that the acceleration region remains optically thin enough for the inner disk to be directly visible (τ < 1, n_gas ≲ 1.2 × 10^10 cm^−3) is used both to justify the one-zone geometry and to set the upper bound on density. Given that the same region must also supply the magnetic power and the target photon field for efficient pγ, a short consistency check that the adopted n_i (Table 2) and the wind density at the funnel wall do not violate this optical-depth constraint under the chosen inclination would strengthen the geometric picture.
minor comments (5)
  1. Eq. (7) and the surrounding paragraph should state more explicitly that Φ ≃ 0.01 Φ_MAD is a fiducial, conservative guess rather than a derived result; a one-sentence caveat in the abstract/conclusions would also help.
  2. Figure 14 and Table 3 quote IceCube/IceCube-Gen2 10-yr 5σ discovery potentials and expected event rates; a brief note that these are not background-subtracted significances (as the authors themselves remark for NGC 1068) would avoid over-interpretation.
  3. Notation for the wind mass-loss index s and the advection parameter f is introduced early but the numerical values (s = 0.5, f = 0.5) appear only in Table 1; a short reminder in the text of §2.1 would improve readability.
  4. In §5 the unoscillated flux is written ϕ^(0) and the oscillated muon flux uses P_μμ, P_eμ; citing the exact PMNS parameters (or the Esteban et al. 2020 best-fit values already mentioned) in a footnote would make the calculation fully reproducible.
  5. A few typographical issues: “fort_Edd” → “for t_Edd”, “a second peak emerge” → “emerges”, and inconsistent use of “model A/B” vs “models A and B”.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Detectability and NGC 7469 match rest on free normalizations (Φ ≃ 0.01 Φ_MAD, 0.1 conversion efficiency, Γ tuned to 1.5) that set neutrino amplitude/hardness by construction of the inputs.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sect. 6 (NGC 7469 application), Table 4 and text preceding Fig. 15]
    "Since the neutrino data suggest a hard spectral index of 1.9, we also explore a lower-density acceleration region with stronger magnetization (σgas), corresponding to an injected proton index of Γ =1.5, which results in a harder and more intense neutrino spectrum. ... Within this framework, the model can account for the reported neutrino events from NGC 7469 based on its properties as a super-accreting source."

    Γ is chosen expressly to reproduce the IceCube best-fit index ≈1.9 and the density/magnetization are adjusted so the resulting flux (≈2–8×10^{-10} GeV cm^{-2} s^{-1}) overlaps the reported 1σ band; the claim that the model “can account for” the two events is therefore the direct output of parameters tuned to those same data.

  2. other [Sect. 2.1 Eqs. (5)–(7) and Sect. 2.3 (L_rel definition)]
    "we suppose Φ≃0.01Φ_MAD. ... We assume that 10% of the magnetic power available in the reconnection region is converted into accelerated particles, so that L_rel = L_p + L_e =0.1 L_mag (del Valle et al., 2011), with L_mag = B^{2} c z_acc^{2} tan^{2}δ / 2."

    Neutrino luminosity scales directly with L_p ∝ L_mag ∝ B^{2}, and B (and r_mag) are fixed by the single unconstrained factor 0.01 applied to Φ_MAD; the 10 % efficiency is likewise free. Model-B rates (~0.23 yr^{-1}) and the NGC 7469 fluxes therefore exist only because these normalizations were chosen large enough; a modestly smaller Φ collapses the signal by orders of magnitude, rendering the “may be detectable” statements by construction of the inputs rather than a robust output of the geometry.

full rationale

The neutrino spectral peak near 10–100 TeV is a genuine kinematic consequence of pγ interactions on the supercritical-disk photon field (T ~ 10^5 K) together with secondary cooling, and is not circular. Absolute fluxes and event rates, however, scale linearly with L_p, which is fixed by three free choices: Φ ≃ 0.01 Φ_MAD (Eq. 7) that sets B and L_mag via Eqs. 5 and 9/18, the assumed 10 % conversion L_rel = 0.1 L_mag, and a ≃ m_p/m_e. For NGC 7469 the injection index is further set to Γ = 1.5 precisely because IceCube reports ≈1.9, producing a flux that overlaps the reported best-fit by design. These steps make the statements “may be detectable” and “can account for the reported events” conditional on the chosen inputs rather than independent predictions of the super-Eddington geometry. No self-definitional loops, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors, or load-bearing self-citations of unverified results appear; the disk/wind structure follows external literature (Fukue, Akizuki & Fukue). Score 4 therefore reflects partial circularity confined to the amplitude and source-specific hardness, not the overall scenario.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The load-bearing claim is a multi-parameter astrophysical scenario, not a theorem. Detectable neutrinos require a chosen sub-MAD flux, reconnection efficiency, non-thermal power fraction, proton/electron partition, injection index, and funnel density, plus the Fukue/Akizuki supercritical disk+wind structure. The “magnetically confined reconnection layer” at z_acc=10 r_g is a model construct with solar-corona analogy but no independent measurement in these nuclei. Without those knobs the PeV protons and IceCube-relevant fluxes do not follow from first principles alone.

free parameters (7)
  • Φ / Φ_MAD
    Set to 0.01 by hand from radio-quiet vs radio-loud contrast; controls r_mag, B, and L_mag.
  • L_rel / L_mag
    Fixed at 0.1 (del Valle et al. 2011 style); sets total non-thermal power and thus neutrino luminosity scale.
  • a = L_p / L_e
    Taken ~ m_p/m_e ~ 10^3; makes emission proton-dominated and controls hadronic neutrino yield.
  • η_rec (reconnection efficiency)
    ≈0.3 from v_rec~v_A~c and Bohm diffusion; sets acceleration rate and E_max.
  • Injection index Γ and n_i (hence σ_gas)
    Γ=2.5/2 (models A/B) or 1.5 for NGC 7469; n_i chosen to give σ_gas~7–10 and desired spectral hardness.
  • z_acc, Δz_acc
    Fiducial z_acc=10 r_g, Δz_acc=0.1 z_acc; defines interaction volume and radiation field strength.
  • β_disk, α, f, s, ṁ
    Disk magnetization, viscosity, advection, wind index, and accretion rate set B, T_disk, opening angle; two discrete models plus NGC 7469 retune.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Supercritical disk structure and wind mass-loss follow Fukue (2004) / Akizuki & Fukue (2006) self-similar solutions with photon trapping and r_crit≈40 ṁ r_g.
    Entire target photon field, B_φ, and wind density/photosphere rest on this disk family (Sect. 2.1–2.2).
  • domain assumption Particle acceleration is magnetic reconnection in a one-zone magnetically confined funnel layer with Bohm diffusion and η_rec from Alfvénic reconnection.
    Sect. 2.3 and Eq. (20)–(21); without efficient reconnection to PeV the neutrino peak fails.
  • domain assumption Funnel gas density is low enough that τ_Thomson < 1 along the line of sight (n_gas ≲ 1.2×10^10 cm^{-3}) so the inner disk thermal continuum can be seen.
    Eq. (14); required for Seyfert-like optical/UV disk signatures while still allowing hadronic interactions.
  • standard math Standard pγ, pp, synchrotron, IC, pion/muon/kaon decay, and γγ/γN cross sections and inelasticities apply in the steady-state one-zone transport equation.
    Sect. 3–5; conventional cascade machinery (Kelner, Romero & Vila, Cerutti, etc.).
  • ad hoc to paper NGC 7469 is super-Eddington with ṁ~10 and low inclination ~15°, and the two IceCube events are associated with the nucleus.
    Sect. 6; accretion rate is observationally uncertain (Du et al. log ṁ with large errors); association significance is modest (~2.4σ class).
invented entities (1)
  • Magnetically confined reconnection layer at z_acc ≈ 10 r_g inside the super-Eddington funnel no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a compact, magnetized site for proton acceleration to PeV while remaining under-dense relative to the wind walls.
    Postulated geometry combining solar-corona reconnection analogies with supercritical funnel structure; not directly imaged or independently constrained in these Seyferts.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 41982 in / 4244 out tokens · 37505 ms · 2026-07-12T01:35:13.290846+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimessenger observations suggest that Seyfert galaxies are promising sources of high-energy neutrinos, but their dense inner environments can strongly suppress the emerging very-high-energy gamma-ray emission. Active galactic nuclei (AGN) undergoing intense accretion episodes can enter a super-Eddington state, in which the accretion flow becomes geometrically and optically thick within a critical radius and develops strong magnetic fields in its innermost region. At the same time, large amounts of matter are expelled from the disk surface in the form of powerful, radiation-driven winds. In this work, we explore a scenario in which the cores of super-Eddington AGN provide suitable conditions for the acceleration of relativistic particles, including hadrons, via magnetic reconnection in a magnetically confined region close to the supermassive black hole. The accelerated hadronic component interacts with the intense photon field of the disk, leading to a copious neutrino flux peaking at 10-100 TeV that may be detectable with current observatories such as IceCube and KM3NeT, while the surrounding outflow efficiently absorbs the accompanying gamma-ray emission from the inner core. We also apply the model to the nearby super-Eddington Seyfert 1 NGC 7469 as a representative case with two reported neutrino events. In this framework, super-Eddington AGN, in particular Seyfert galaxies undergoing transient intense accretion episodes, emerge as plausible hidden neutrino sources, offering a natural explanation for the coexistence of efficient neutrino production and a strongly attenuated gamma-ray counterpart.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03559 by Gustavo E. Romero, Lucas M. Pasquevich, Mat\'ias M. Reynoso.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Acceleration, cooling, and diffusion rates for primary electrons. IC interactions with disk photons dominate at low energies, whereas synchrotron cooling becomes dominant above ∼ 20 GeV in model A and above ∼ 3 GeV in model B. In both cases, electrons reach maximum energies of ∼ 200 GeV. 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 Ep [GeV] 10 8 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 t 1 [s 1 ] … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cooling, escape, diffusion, and decay rates for charged pions. Synchrotron radiation provides the dominant cooling channel over most of the relevant energy range, while πγ interactions become important above ∼ 2 × 105 GeV. where σpγ is the total cross section and κpγ is the correspond￾ing inelasticity. This interaction includes two main channels: Bethe-Heitler pair production, p + γ → p + e − + e + , and p… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cooling, escape, diffusion, and decay rates for muons. charged kaons through pγ interactions, with a threshold energy of order ∼ 1 GeV. Although subdominant, this channel con￾tributes at the highest energies through the decays K + → µ ++νµ and K − → µ − + ν¯µ. We also compute the diffusion of charged particles in the tur￾bulent region as t −1 diff = 2D(E) L 2 , (23) where D(E) is the diffusion coefficient … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Steady-state distributions of primary electrons and protons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Steady-state distribution of secondary pairs produced through the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Steady-state distributions of charged pions produced through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic view of the environment around a super-Eddington AGN. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Attenuation factor exp(−τγγ) produced by γγ absorption in the ther￾mal radiation fields of the wind photosphere and the inner disk, for models A and B. pairs through synchrotron radiation and IC. We also include the gamma-ray emission generated by the decay of neutral pi￾ons produced in both pp and pγ interactions. For these radia￾tive processes we adopt the standard expressions given by Blu￾menthal and G… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spectral energy distributions for models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Muon-neutrino plus antineutrino flux for a super-Eddington AGN at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Predicted non-thermal electromagnetic radiation and muon-neutrino flux from NGC 7469, for proton injection indices of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ApJ 883, 135

    Constraints on Gamma-Ray and Neutrino Emission from NGC 1068 with the MAGIC Telescopes. ApJ 883, 135. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a51,arXiv:1906.10954. Adrián-Martínez, S., et al., KM3NeT Collaboration, 2016. Let- ter of intent for km3net 2.0. Journal of Physics G: Nu- clear and Particle Physics 43, 084001. doi:10.1088/0954- 3899/43/8/084001. Aharonian, F.A....

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a51 1906

  2. [2]

    Bright X-ray pulsars as sources of MeV neutrinos in the sky

    Goals-jwst: Mid-infrared spectroscopy of the nucleus of ngc 7469. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 942, L37. URL:https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acac66, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acac66. Asahina, Y ., Ohsuga, K., 2022. General Relativistic Radia- tion Magnetohydrodynamics Simulations of Black Hole Ac- cretion Disks: Comparison of Methods Based on Variable ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acac66 2041

  3. [3]

    PS16dtm: A Tidal Disruption Event in a Narrow-line Seyfert 1 Galaxy

    Goals-jwst: Gas dynamics and excitation in ngc 7469 revealed by nirspec. The Astrophysical Journal 965, 103. URL:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a50, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a50. Blanchard, P.K., Nicholl, M., Berger, E., Guillochon, J., Margutti, R., Chornock, R., Alexander, K.D., Leja, J., Drout, M.R., 2017. PS16dtm: A Tidal Disruption Event in a N...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a50 2017

  4. [4]

    El Mellah, I., Cerutti, B., Crinquand, B., Parfrey, K., 2022

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/22,arXiv:1504.01844. El Mellah, I., Cerutti, B., Crinquand, B., Parfrey, K., 2022. Spinning black holes magnetically connected to a Kep- lerian disk. Magnetosphere, reconnection sheet, particle acceleration, and coronal heating. A&A 663, A169. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142847,arXiv:2112.03933. Esteban, I., Gonzalez-Garcia, M., M...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/22 2022

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1126/science.abg3395, arXiv:2211.09972

    Science 378, 538–543. doi:10.1126/science.abg3395, arXiv:2211.09972. Inoue, Y ., Khangulyan, D., Doi, A., 2020. On the Origin of High-energy Neutrinos from NGC 1068: The Role of Non- thermal Coronal Activity. ApJL 891, L33. doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/ab7661,arXiv:1909.02239. Jiang, J., Walton, D.J., Gallo, L.C., Fabian, A.C., Grupe, D., McMahon, R., Reynolds,...

    doi:10.1126/science.abg3395 2020

  6. [6]

    Jin, C., Done, C., Ward, M., Gierli ´nski, M., Mullaney, J.,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff,arXiv:1709.02845. Jin, C., Done, C., Ward, M., Gierli ´nski, M., Mullaney, J.,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff

  7. [7]

    MNRAS 398, L16–L20

    The Seyfert AGN RX J0136.9-3510 and the spec- tral state of super Eddington accretion flows. MNRAS 398, L16–L20. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00697.x, arXiv:0903.4698. Jin, C., Done, C., Ward, M., Panessa, F., Liu, B., Liu, H.Y .,

    doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00697.x 2009

  8. [8]

    The Extreme Super-Eddington NLS1 RX J0134.2-4258 -- II. A Weak-Line Seyfert Linking to the Weak-Line Quasar

    The extreme super-eddington NLS1 RX J0134.2-4258 - II. A weak-line Seyfert linking to the weak-line quasar. MNRAS 518, 6065–6082. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3513, arXiv:2208.06581. Kagan, D., Sironi, L., Cerutti, B., Giannios, D., 2015. Rela- tivistic Magnetic Reconnection in Pair Plasmas and Its As- trophysical Applications. Space Sci. Rev. 191, 545–573. doi:...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3513 2015

  9. [9]

    MNRAS 380, 320–330

    TeV light curve of PSR B1259-63/SS2883. MNRAS 380, 320–330. Kheirandish, A., Murase, K., Kimura, S.S., 2021. High- energy Neutrinos from Magnetized Coronae of Active Galac- tic Nuclei and Prospects for Identification of Seyfert Galax- ies and Quasars in Neutrino Telescopes. ApJ 922, 45. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c77,arXiv:2102.04475. Kimura, S.S., Toma, K....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c77 2021

  10. [10]

    arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2603.20378doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.20378, arXiv:2603.20378

    Probing the statistical correlation of optical tidal disruption events with high-energy neutrinos. arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2603.20378doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.20378, arXiv:2603.20378. Lazarian, A., Xu, S., 2021. Diffusion of Cosmic Rays in MHD Turbulence with Magnetic Mirrors. ApJ 923, 53. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2de9,arXiv:2106.08362. Lipari, P., Lusignoli...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.20378 2021

  11. [11]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/26, arXiv:1010.3058

    ApJ 724, 26–38. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/26, arXiv:1010.3058. Maximon, L.C., 1968. Simple analytic expres- sions for the total born approximation cross sec- tion for pair production in a coulomb field. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., B, 72: 79-88(Jan.-Mar. 1968). URL:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4503338, doi:10.6028/jres.072B.011. 19 McKinney, J.C., Tchekhovs...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/1/26 1968

  12. [12]

    MNRAS 423, 3083–3117

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simula- tions of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes. MNRAS 423, 3083–3117. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2012.21074.x,arXiv:1201.4163. Middei, R., Bianchi, S., Cappi, M., Petrucci, P.O., Ursini, F., Arav, N., Behar, E., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Costantini, E., De Marco, B., Di Gesu, L., Ebrero, J., Ka...

    doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2012

  13. [13]

    Multi-wavelength campaign on NGC 7469 IV. The broad-band X-ray spectrum

    IV . The broad-band X-ray spectrum. A&A 615, A163. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832726,arXiv:1803.07334. Murase, K., 2022. Hidden Hearts of Neutrino Active Galax- ies. ApJL 941, L17. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca53c, arXiv:2211.04460. Murase, K., Karwin, C.M., Kimura, S.S., Ajello, M., Buson, S.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832726 2022

  14. [14]

    ApJL 961, L34

    Sub-GeV Gamma Rays from Nearby Seyfert Galaxies and Implications for Coronal Neutrino Emission. ApJL 961, L34. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad19c5,arXiv:2312.16089. Murase, K., Kimura, S.S., Mészáros, P., 2020. Hid- den Cores of Active Galactic Nuclei as the Origin of Medium-Energy Neutrinos: Critical Tests with the MeV Gamma-Ray Connection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad19c5 2041

  15. [15]

    Astroparticle Physics 177, 103214

    Neutrinos from hidden ultraluminous X-ray sources in the Galaxy. Astroparticle Physics 177, 103214. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2026.103214, arXiv:2601.13378. Passos Reis, L., de Gouveia dal Pino, E.M., Rodríguez Ramírez, J.C., Vicentin, G.H., Dal Pino, E.M.d.G., Rodríguez-Ramírez, J.C., 2025. Cosmic Ray Acceleration by Turbulence-Driven Magnetic Reconnec...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2026.103214 2026

  16. [16]

    MNRAS 387, 1745–1754

    Production of gamma rays and neutrinos in the dark jets of the microquasar SS433. MNRAS 387, 1745–1754. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13364.x, arXiv:0801.2903. Romero, G.E., Sotomayor, P., 2025. Super-Accreting Active Galactic Nuclei as Neutrino Sources. Universe 11, 288. doi:10.3390/universe11090288,arXiv:2508.18441. Romero, G.E., Vieyro, F.L., Chaty, S.,...

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13364.x 2008

  17. [17]

    ApJ 981, 103

    Two 100 TeV Neutrinos Coincident with the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 7469. ApJ 981, 103. doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/adb031,arXiv:2403.03752. Sotomayor, P., Romero, G.E., 2022. Nonthermal radiation from the central region of super-accreting active galactic nu- clei. A&A 664, A178. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243682, arXiv:2206.10731. Stein, R., van Velzen, S., Kowalski, ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538- 2022

  18. [18]

    The extreme properties of the nearby hyper-Eddington accreting Active Galactic Nucleus in IRAS 04416+1215

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3152,arXiv:2109.02573. van Velzen, S., 2018. On the Mass and Luminosity Func- tions of Tidal Disruption Flares: Rate Suppression due to Black Hole Event Horizons. ApJ 852, 72. doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/aa998e,arXiv:1707.03458. van Velzen, S., Holoien, T.W.S., Onori, F., Hung, T., Ar- cavi, I., 2020. Optical-Ultraviolet Tidal Disruption ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3152 2018