Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Experimentation for Homogenous Policy Change

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.12318 v2 pith:BIH2CIJD submitted 2021-01-28 stat.ME stat.AP

classification stat.MEstat.AP
keywords treatmentaverageconsiderinterestinterferencerandomizationtargetsthere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

When the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption is violated and there is interference among units, there is not a uniquely defined Average Treatment Effect, and alternative estimands may be of interest. Among these are average unit-level differences in outcomes under different homogeneous treatment policies. We refer to such targets as Global Average Treatment Effects. We consider approaches to experimental design with multiple treatment conditions under partial interference and, given the estimand of interest, we show that difference-in-means estimators may perform better than correctly specified regression models in finite samples on root mean squared error for such targets. With errors correlated at the cluster level, we demonstrate that two-stage randomization procedures with intra-cluster correlation of treatment strictly between zero and one may dominate one-stage randomization designs on the same metric. Simulations illustrate performance of this approach; we consider an application to online experiments at Facebook.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools