Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SQA-SAM: Segmentation Quality Assessment for Medical Images Utilizing the Segment Anything Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.09899 v1 pith:BLGWFA7G submitted 2023-12-15 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords segmentationimagemedicalmodelqualityassessmentcorrelationmedseg
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Segmentation quality assessment (SQA) plays a critical role in the deployment of a medical image based AI system. Users need to be informed/alerted whenever an AI system generates unreliable/incorrect predictions. With the introduction of the Segment Anything Model (SAM), a general foundation segmentation model, new research opportunities emerged in how one can utilize SAM for medical image segmentation. In this paper, we propose a novel SQA method, called SQA-SAM, which exploits SAM to enhance the accuracy of quality assessment for medical image segmentation. When a medical image segmentation model (MedSeg) produces predictions for a test image, we generate visual prompts based on the predictions, and SAM is utilized to generate segmentation maps corresponding to the visual prompts. How well MedSeg's segmentation aligns with SAM's segmentation indicates how well MedSeg's segmentation aligns with the general perception of objectness and image region partition. We develop a score measure for such alignment. In experiments, we find that the generated scores exhibit moderate to strong positive correlation (in Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation) with Dice coefficient scores reflecting the true segmentation quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Pixel Agreement: Large Language Models as Clinical Guardrails for Reliable Medical Image Segmentation

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A structured multi-stage LLM prompt can classify medical segmentation quality zero-shot, with accuracy comparable to trained vision models on a small test set.

Pith tools