The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2402.15604 · v4 · pith:BMXDSI3V · submitted 2024-02-23 · cs.RO · cs.SY· eess.SY

Goal-Reaching Trajectory Design Near Danger with Piecewise Affine Reach-avoid Computation

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BMXDSI3Vrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY
keywords methodmodelparcgoalnearplanningreach-avoidaffine
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Autonomous mobile robots must maintain safety, but should not sacrifice performance, leading to the classical reach-avoid problem: find a trajectory that is guaranteed to reach a goal and avoid obstacles. This paper addresses the near danger case, also known as a narrow gap, where the agent starts near the goal, but must navigate through tight obstacles that block its path. The proposed method builds off the common approach of using a simplified planning model to generate plans, which are then tracked using a high-fidelity tracking model and controller. Existing approaches use reachability analysis to overapproximate the error between these models and ensure safety, but doing so introduces numerical approximation error conservativeness that prevents goal-reaching. The present work instead proposes a Piecewise Affine Reach-avoid Computation (PARC) method to tightly approximate the reachable set of the planning model. PARC significantly reduces conservativeness through a careful choice of the planning model and set representation, along with an effective approach to handling time-varying tracking errors. The utility of this method is demonstrated through extensive numerical experiments in which PARC outperforms state-of-the-art reach avoid methods in near-danger goal reaching. Furthermore, in a simulated demonstration, PARC enables the generation of provably-safe extreme vehicle dynamics drift parking maneuvers. A preliminary hardware demo on a TurtleBot3 also validates the method.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ShardNet: Training Neural Controllers with Hard, Non-Convex Constraints

    eess.SY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ShardNet enforces non-convex polyhedral safety constraints in neural controllers by construction via a differentiable projection layer, achieving 100% verified safety and over 3x larger safe sets than prior methods on...

  2. Safe Large-Scale Robust Nonlinear MPC in Milliseconds via Reachability-Constrained System Level Synthesis on the GPU

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GPU-SLS computes safe robust nonlinear MPC policies online in ~20 ms for up to 75D systems by reachability-constrained system level synthesis accelerated via custom GPU QP solvers.