Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.04779 v3 pith:BS4VGKKU submitted 2020-06-08 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords learningofflinepolicyconservativeq-learningvaluechallengecomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Effectively leveraging large, previously collected datasets in reinforcement learning (RL) is a key challenge for large-scale real-world applications. Offline RL algorithms promise to learn effective policies from previously-collected, static datasets without further interaction. However, in practice, offline RL presents a major challenge, and standard off-policy RL methods can fail due to overestimation of values induced by the distributional shift between the dataset and the learned policy, especially when training on complex and multi-modal data distributions. In this paper, we propose conservative Q-learning (CQL), which aims to address these limitations by learning a conservative Q-function such that the expected value of a policy under this Q-function lower-bounds its true value. We theoretically show that CQL produces a lower bound on the value of the current policy and that it can be incorporated into a policy learning procedure with theoretical improvement guarantees. In practice, CQL augments the standard Bellman error objective with a simple Q-value regularizer which is straightforward to implement on top of existing deep Q-learning and actor-critic implementations. On both discrete and continuous control domains, we show that CQL substantially outperforms existing offline RL methods, often learning policies that attain 2-5 times higher final return, especially when learning from complex and multi-modal data distributions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 537 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  2. Good Rankers, Bad Objectives: Bilinear Contrastive Critics under Expressive Policy Search

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bilinear contrastive critics remain good compatibility rankers but are unsafe to maximize for action selection; cosine bounding does not fix value decalibration, while Bellman TD-Q does.

  3. JD-BP: A Joint-Decision Generative Framework for Auto-Bidding and Pricing

    cs.GT 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    JD-BP jointly generates bids and pricing corrections via generative models, memory-less return-to-go, trajectory augmentation, and energy-based DPO to improve auto-bidding performance despite prediction errors and latency.

  4. Generative Sequential Notification Optimization via Multi-Objective Decision Transformers

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Decision Transformer with quantile-regression return prompts improved notification decisions at LinkedIn, boosting sessions by 0.72% over the deployed CQL baseline in a live A/B test.

  5. Guided Action Flow: Q-Guided Inference for Flow-Matching Vision-Language-Action Policies

    cs.RO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.5 of 10

    Q-guided reverse-time flow sampling with a rollout-trained action-chunk critic improves frozen SmolVLA success on LIBERO, with strong single-task gains but only modest locked held-out transfer.

  6. Value Flows

    cs.LG 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Value Flows fits the full return distribution in RL with a flow-matching critic and reweights its learning objective by estimated return variance; the central theoretical guarantee does not follow from the stated equations.

  7. Safe Deployment of Offline Reinforcement Learning via Input Convex Action Correction

    eess.SY 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A deployment-time correction layer using input convex neural networks improves offline RL policies on simulated polymerisation reactor grade transitions.

  8. Digi-Q: Learning Q-Value Functions for Training Device-Control Agents

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An offline RL method learns a Q-function from frozen VLM features and extracts a device-control policy by imitating the best of several actions ranked by that Q-function.

  9. Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms To Foundation Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A dissertation uniting the author's published results: non-exploitable Nash-DQN policies and the FightLadder benchmark for games, plus diffusion/consistency-model world models for RL — a compilation rather than new results.

  10. GenAI-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning towards Distributed Agent Intelligence: A Generative-RL Agent Perspective

    cs.AI 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A position paper claiming that generative-AI agents that model and predict multi-agent dynamics will replace today's reactive MARL approaches.

Pith tools