Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation: From Theory to Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.15703 v1 pith:BUDC7OON submitted 2023-07-28 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords uncertaintylanguageapplicationsgenerationnaturaltheorysystemsactive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances of powerful Language Models have allowed Natural Language Generation (NLG) to emerge as an important technology that can not only perform traditional tasks like summarisation or translation, but also serve as a natural language interface to a variety of applications. As such, it is crucial that NLG systems are trustworthy and reliable, for example by indicating when they are likely to be wrong; and supporting multiple views, backgrounds and writing styles -- reflecting diverse human sub-populations. In this paper, we argue that a principled treatment of uncertainty can assist in creating systems and evaluation protocols better aligned with these goals. We first present the fundamental theory, frameworks and vocabulary required to represent uncertainty. We then characterise the main sources of uncertainty in NLG from a linguistic perspective, and propose a two-dimensional taxonomy that is more informative and faithful than the popular aleatoric/epistemic dichotomy. Finally, we move from theory to applications and highlight exciting research directions that exploit uncertainty to power decoding, controllable generation, self-assessment, selective answering, active learning and more.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models Can Be a Viable Substitute for Expert Political Surveys When a Shock Disrupts Traditional Measurement Approaches

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-based pairwise comparisons can recover pre-shock perceptions of federal agencies, including a new knowledge-institution measure that predicts DOGE layoffs.

  2. Efficient Hallucination Detection for LLMs Using Uncertainty-Aware Attention Heads

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RAUQ detects hallucinated LLM output by selecting one attention head per layer (the one that most attends to the preceding token), propagating that attention together with token probabilities, and taking the maximum u...

  3. Position: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model Agents

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper arguing that aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty splits fail for LLM agents and proposing underspecification, interaction, and output-based uncertainty research.

Pith tools