Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Does Synthetic Data Generation of LLMs Help Clinical Text Mining?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.04360 v2 pith:BUNIYC37 submitted 2023-03-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords chatgptdatamodelsclinicalminingperformancetasktasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of highly potent models like OpenAI's ChatGPT. These models have exhibited exceptional performance in a variety of tasks, such as question answering, essay composition, and code generation. However, their effectiveness in the healthcare sector remains uncertain. In this study, we seek to investigate the potential of ChatGPT to aid in clinical text mining by examining its ability to extract structured information from unstructured healthcare texts, with a focus on biological named entity recognition and relation extraction. However, our preliminary results indicate that employing ChatGPT directly for these tasks resulted in poor performance and raised privacy concerns associated with uploading patients' information to the ChatGPT API. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new training paradigm that involves generating a vast quantity of high-quality synthetic data with labels utilizing ChatGPT and fine-tuning a local model for the downstream task. Our method has resulted in significant improvements in the performance of downstream tasks, improving the F1-score from 23.37% to 63.99% for the named entity recognition task and from 75.86% to 83.59% for the relation extraction task. Furthermore, generating data using ChatGPT can significantly reduce the time and effort required for data collection and labeling, as well as mitigate data privacy concerns. In summary, the proposed framework presents a promising solution to enhance the applicability of LLM models to clinical text mining.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimizing the Preconditioner: A Black-box Online-to-Nonconvex Conversion with Static Regret Minimization Oracles

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An OCO algorithm with only O(√T) static regret, pluggable as a preconditioner selector, recovers the classical O(1/√T) stationarity rate on smooth stochastic nonconvex problems and the O(T^{-2/7}) rate on nonsmooth ones.

  2. Utility-Preserving De-Identification for Math Tutoring: Investigating Numeric Ambiguity in the MathEd-PII Benchmark Dataset

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The MathEd-PII benchmark shows that math-aware and segment-aware LLM prompting raises PII detection F1 from 0.379 to 0.821 while cutting false redactions of instructional numbers.

  3. Decomposed Entailment for Factuality Checking and Hallucination Detection

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HallDetect detects source-grounded hallucinations by decomposing responses into atomic claims and verifying each with a compact NLI model over multi-scale source chunks, outperforming frugal generative baselines on th...

  4. Pre-Trained AI Model Assisted Online Decision-Making under Missing Covariates: A Theoretical Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces model elasticity to bound the regret of contextual bandits with AI-imputed missing covariates, and shows that MAR-based calibration removes the dominant linear regret term.

  5. Self-Error-Instruct: Generalizing from Errors for LLMs Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Self-Error-Instruct clusters a model's math errors into types, synthesizes targeted practice data per type, and selects the best samples for fine-tuning, improving held-out math test accuracy.

  6. Language Agents as Digital Representatives in Collective Decision-Making

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned language models can generate individual critiques that, when fed into a consensus-building process, yield outcomes close to those produced by real participants.

  7. Synthetic Consumer Insight Generation with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Across models, prompts, and temperatures, LLM projective responses match human city-tourism themes at a coarse level while remaining stylistically more polished and compound-adjective-heavy.

  8. LLM-HyPZ: Hardware Vulnerability Discovery using an LLM-Assisted Hybrid Platform for Zero-Shot Knowledge Extraction and Refinement

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A zero-shot LLM classification, embedding, and clustering pipeline labels 1,742 hardware vulnerabilities in the 2021-2024 CVE corpus and feeds MITRE's MIHW 2025 list.

  9. Separation Logic of Generic Resources via Sheafeology

    cs.LO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sheafeology uses sheaf categories to make first-order logic resource-aware, yielding separation logics for generic resources such as memory and random variables.

  10. Foundation Model Empowered Synesthesia of Machines (SoM): AI-native Intelligent Multi-Modal Sensing-Communication Integration

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a systematic classification and two roadmaps for using foundation models (LLMs and wireless foundation models) to design Synesthesia of Machines systems for 6G, with preliminary case-study evidence ...

Pith tools