Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Anytime-valid off-policy inference for contextual bandits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.10768 v3 pith:BUXF6G5L submitted 2022-10-19 stat.ME cs.LGmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

Anytime-valid off-policy inference for contextual bandits

classification stat.ME cs.LGmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords off-policyinferencecontextualmethodspolicytheyadaptivelyalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Contextual bandit algorithms are ubiquitous tools for active sequential experimentation in healthcare and the tech industry. They involve online learning algorithms that adaptively learn policies over time to map observed contexts $X_t$ to actions $A_t$ in an attempt to maximize stochastic rewards $R_t$. This adaptivity raises interesting but hard statistical inference questions, especially counterfactual ones: for example, it is often of interest to estimate the properties of a hypothetical policy that is different from the logging policy that was used to collect the data -- a problem known as ``off-policy evaluation'' (OPE). Using modern martingale techniques, we present a comprehensive framework for OPE inference that relax unnecessary conditions made in some past works, significantly improving on them both theoretically and empirically. Importantly, our methods can be employed while the original experiment is still running (that is, not necessarily post-hoc), when the logging policy may be itself changing (due to learning), and even if the context distributions are a highly dependent time-series (such as if they are drifting over time). More concretely, we derive confidence sequences for various functionals of interest in OPE. These include doubly robust ones for time-varying off-policy mean reward values, but also confidence bands for the entire cumulative distribution function of the off-policy reward distribution. All of our methods (a) are valid at arbitrary stopping times (b) only make nonparametric assumptions, (c) do not require importance weights to be uniformly bounded and if they are, we do not need to know these bounds, and (d) adapt to the empirical variance of our estimators. In summary, our methods enable anytime-valid off-policy inference using adaptively collected contextual bandit data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A General Framework for Optimal Group Sequential Testing via Mixed-Integer Linear Programming

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The authors propose an S-MILP framework that optimizes group sequential testing boundaries to achieve faster rejection of the null hypothesis compared to traditional methods while controlling type I and type II errors.

  2. Anytime-valid Optimal Policy Identification

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Constructs a time-indexed set S_t retaining the true optimal policy uniformly over time with high probability, enabling early stopping with sample complexity O((log |Π| + log log(1/Δ_min))/Δ_min²) when the optimum is unique.

  3. A General Framework for Optimal Group Sequential Testing via Mixed-Integer Linear Programming

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An S-MILP optimization finds group sequential test boundaries that dominate Lan-DeMets, Pocock, and O'Brien-Fleming methods by spending alpha more aggressively early while still controlling error rates.

  4. Efficient Sequential Evaluation of Large Language Models

    stat.ML 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A confidence-sequence framework for sequentially estimating an LLM's average benchmark accuracy under adaptive question selection, with growth-oriented sampling rules that in practice often lose to uniform sampling.