REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Evaluation of Intelligent Process Automation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Intelligent Process Automation (IPA) is emerging as a sub-field of AI to support the automation of long-tail processes which requires the coordination of tasks across different systems. So far, the field of IPA has been largely driven by systems and use cases, lacking a more formal definition of the task and its assessment. This paper aims to address this gap by providing a formalisation of IPA and by proposing specific metrics to support the empirical evaluation of IPA systems. This work also compares and contrasts IPA against related tasks such as end-user programming and program synthesis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LMV-RPA: Large Model Voting-based Robotic Process Automation
LMV-RPA combines four OCR engines, two LLMs, and majority voting to structure invoices as JSON, claiming 99 percent accuracy and 80 percent faster processing that the paper's own tables do not support.
-
LMRPA: Large Language Model-Driven Efficient Robotic Process Automation for OCR
An OCR pipeline enhanced with an LLM is benchmarked as faster than UiPath and Automation Anywhere, but the benchmark's methodology and reported numbers contain inconsistencies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.