The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2606.01149 · v1 · pith:BYBFMGHF · submitted 2026-05-31 · cs.CV

CoSTL: Comprehensive Spatial-Temporal Representation Learning for Moment Retrieval and Highlight Detection

Xin Dong , Wenjia Geng , Wenfeng Deng , Yansong Tang This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith2026-06-28 17:32 UTCgrok-4.3pith:BYBFMGHFopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV
keywords moment retrievalhighlight detectionspatial-temporal representationtext-driven encodervideo groundingfine-grained featuresmulti-scale temporal
0
0 comments X

The pith

A text-driven two-step image encoder plus multi-scale temporal module together capture fine-grained spatial and temporal video features for moment retrieval and highlight detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper targets the problem that prior video grounding methods overlook detailed visual cues inside individual frames that match a text query. CoSTL adds a text-driven progressive fine-grained image encoder that runs a two-step knowledge extraction process to build better spatial representations tied to the query. It pairs this with a multi-scale temporal perception module that processes dynamics across the full video. The combined representations produce state-of-the-art results on the QVHighlights, Charades-STA, TACoS, and TVSum benchmarks.

Core claim

CoSTL captures both fine-grained image-level information and temporal dynamics for video moment retrieval and highlight detection. It incorporates a text-driven progressive fine-grained image encoder that performs a two-step text-driven knowledge extraction process to learn fine-grained spatial representations, and adds a multi-scale temporal perception module that captures comprehensive spatial-temporal representations, yielding state-of-the-art performance on four public benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The text-driven progressive fine-grained image encoder that performs a two-step text-driven knowledge extraction process, together with the multi-scale temporal perception module.

If this is right

  • Moment retrieval localizes text-described segments more precisely by using query-relevant details inside frames.
  • Highlight detection assigns more accurate relevance scores to clips because temporal dynamics are modeled at multiple scales.
  • The same architecture handles both moment retrieval and highlight detection without task-specific redesign.
  • Performance improves across four distinct video datasets without additional dataset-specific tuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-step text-driven extraction could be adapted to other video-text tasks such as dense captioning or video question answering.
  • Replacing the current frame encoder with this module inside existing temporal-only models might lift their scores without full retraining.
  • Testing on videos with heavy occlusion or rapid motion would reveal whether the multi-scale module scales beyond the current benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

Existing methods neglect rich visual information related to the text query inside individual frames, and the two-step encoder plus multi-scale module directly fixes that oversight.

What would settle it

A controlled ablation on the four benchmarks that removes the text-driven two-step encoder or the multi-scale module and shows no drop in retrieval or highlight metrics would falsify the claim that these components drive the gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01149 by Wenfeng Deng, Wenjia Geng, Xin Dong, Yansong Tang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of highlight saliency scores across different methods: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overall architecture of our framework. The input video and query are first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: More visualizations of joint moment retrieval and highlight detection re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Video Moment Retrieval (MR) and Highlight Detection (HD) are crucial tasks in video analysis that aim to localize specific moments and estimate clip-wise relevance based on a given text query. Recent approaches treat them as similar video grounding tasks and use the same architecture to solve them. These tasks require both fine-grained comprehension at the image level and high-level temporal understanding across the entire video. Existing approaches have primarily focused on temporal modeling using frame-level features, often neglecting the rich visual information related to the text query within individual frames. This oversight leads to inaccurate grounding results. To address this limitation, we propose a Comprehensive Spatial-Temporal Representation Learning Framework (CoSTL), which captures both fine-grained image-level information and temporal dynamics. Specifically, CoSTL incorporates a text-driven progressive fine-grained image encoder, performing a two-step text-driven knowledge extraction process to learn fine-grained spatial representations. Furthermore, a multi-scale temporal perception module captures comprehensive spatial-temporal representations, enhancing the model's ability to process temporal dynamics. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on four public benchmarks: QVHighlights, Charades-STA, TACoS, and TVSum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CoSTL, a Comprehensive Spatial-Temporal Representation Learning Framework for video moment retrieval (MR) and highlight detection (HD). It introduces a text-driven progressive fine-grained image encoder performing a two-step text-driven knowledge extraction process for fine-grained spatial representations, along with a multi-scale temporal perception module to capture comprehensive spatial-temporal representations. The central claim is state-of-the-art performance on the QVHighlights, Charades-STA, TACoS, and TVSum benchmarks.

Significance. If the results hold, the work would address a plausible gap in prior methods that rely on frame-level features without sufficient text-driven fine-grained spatial modeling. The dual focus on image-level detail and temporal dynamics is a reasonable architectural response to the stated motivation. However, the significance cannot be assessed because the manuscript supplies no experimental details, baselines, ablations, or quantitative results to support the SOTA claim.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of state-of-the-art performance on four named benchmarks is presented without any experimental protocol, baseline comparisons, error bars, ablation studies, or result tables, so the data-to-claim link cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for reviewing our manuscript. The primary concern is that the abstract asserts SOTA results without supporting experimental details. We clarify that the abstract serves as a concise summary, while the full experimental protocols, baselines, ablations, tables, and quantitative results are provided in the Experiments section of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of state-of-the-art performance on four named benchmarks is presented without any experimental protocol, baseline comparisons, error bars, ablation studies, or result tables, so the data-to-claim link cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract itself does not contain the full experimental details, as abstracts are limited in length and focus on high-level claims. The manuscript includes a complete Experiments section (Section 4) with the experimental protocol, baseline comparisons, result tables on QVHighlights, Charades-STA, TACoS, and TVSum, ablation studies, and quantitative results supporting the SOTA claims. This follows standard academic paper structure where evidence appears in the body rather than the abstract. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical neural architecture (text-driven progressive image encoder plus multi-scale temporal module) motivated by a standard observation about prior work, then reports benchmark results. No equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text that would reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The central claims remain externally falsifiable via the four listed datasets and are therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; standard neural-network training assumptions are implicit but unstated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5734 in / 998 out tokens · 25757 ms · 2026-06-28T17:32:59.860103+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Learning 2d tempo- ral adjacent networks for moment localization with natural language

    Songyang Zhang, Houwen Peng, Jianlong Fu, and Jiebo Luo. Learning 2d tempo- ral adjacent networks for moment localization with natural language. InAAAI, volume 34, pages 12870–12877, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Cross-modal moment localization in videos

    Meng Liu, Xiang Wang, Liqiang Nie, Qi Tian, Baoquan Chen, and Tat-Seng Chua. Cross-modal moment localization in videos. InACM, pages 843–851, 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Tall: Temporal activity localization via language query

    Jiyang Gao, Chen Sun, Zhenheng Yang, and Ram Nevatia. Tall: Temporal activity localization via language query. InICCV, pages 5267–5275, 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis, Antonino Furnari, Rohit Girdhar, Jackson Hamburger, Hao Jiang, Miao Liu, Xingyu Liu, et al. Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. InCVPR, pages 18995–19012, 2022

    2022

  5. [7]

    Less is more: Learning highlight detection from video duration

    Bo Xiong, Yannis Kalantidis, Deepti Ghadiyaram, and Kristen Grauman. Less is more: Learning highlight detection from video duration. InCVPR, pages 1258– 1267, 2019

    2019

  6. [8]

    Highlight detection with pairwise deep ranking for first-person video summarization

    Ting Yao, Tao Mei, and Yong Rui. Highlight detection with pairwise deep ranking for first-person video summarization. InCVPR, pages 982–990, 2016

    2016

  7. [9]

    Localization-aware multi-scale representation learning for repetitive action counting.VCIP, pages 1–5, 2024

    Sujia Wang, Xiangwei Shen, Yansong Tang, Xin Dong, Wenjia Geng, and Lei Chen. Localization-aware multi-scale representation learning for repetitive action counting.VCIP, pages 1–5, 2024

    2024

  8. [10]

    Lavt: Language-aware vision transformer for referring image seg- mentation

    Zhao Yang, Jiaqi Wang, Yansong Tang, Kai Chen, Hengshuang Zhao, and Philip HS Torr. Lavt: Language-aware vision transformer for referring image seg- mentation. InProceedings of the CVPR, pages 18155–18165, 2022

    2022

  9. [11]

    Univtg: Towards unified video-language temporal grounding

    Kevin Qinghong Lin, Pengchuan Zhang, Joya Chen, Shraman Pramanick, Difei Gao, Alex Jinpeng Wang, Rui Yan, and Mike Zheng Shou. Univtg: Towards unified video-language temporal grounding. InICCV, pages 2794–2804, 2023. CoSTL: Comprehensive S-T Representation Learning for MR and HD 13

    2023

  10. [13]

    Detecting moments and highlights in videos via natural language queries.NeurIPS, 34:11846–11858, 2021

    Jie Lei, Tamara L Berg, and Mohit Bansal. Detecting moments and highlights in videos via natural language queries.NeurIPS, 34:11846–11858, 2021

    2021

  11. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08835 , year=

    WonJun Moon, Sangeek Hyun, SuBeen Lee, and Jae-Pil Heo. Correlation-guided query-dependency calibration in video representation learning for temporal ground- ing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08835, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [15]

    Bridging the gap: A unified video comprehension framework for moment retrieval and highlight detection

    Yicheng Xiao, Zhuoyan Luo, Yong Liu, Yue Ma, Hengwei Bian, Yatai Ji, Yujiu Yang, and Xiu Li. Bridging the gap: A unified video comprehension framework for moment retrieval and highlight detection. InCVPR, pages 18709–18719, 2024

    2024

  13. [16]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 19730–19742. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  14. [17]

    Cva: Context-aware video-text alignment for video temporal grounding

    Sungho Moon, Seunghun Lee, Jiwan Seo, and Sunghoon Im. Cva: Context-aware video-text alignment for video temporal grounding. InProceedings of the CVPR, 2026

    2026

  15. [18]

    Timeexpert: an expert-guided video llm for video temporal grounding.ICCV, pages 24286– 24296, 2025

    Zuhao Yang, Yingchen Yu, Yunqing Zhao, Shijian Lu, and Song Bai. Timeexpert: an expert-guided video llm for video temporal grounding.ICCV, pages 24286– 24296, 2025

    2025

  16. [19]

    Multi-stage aggregated transformer network for temporal language localization in videos

    Mingxing Zhang, Yang Yang, Xinghan Chen, Yanli Ji, Xing Xu, Jingjing Li, and Heng Tao Shen. Multi-stage aggregated transformer network for temporal language localization in videos. InCVPR, pages 12669–12678, 2021

    2021

  17. [20]

    Semantic condi- tioned dynamic modulation for temporal sentence grounding in videos.N e u r l, 32, 2019

    Yitian Yuan, Lin Ma, Jingwen Wang, Wei Liu, and Wenwu Zhu. Semantic condi- tioned dynamic modulation for temporal sentence grounding in videos.N e u r l, 32, 2019

    2019

  18. [21]

    Structured multi- level interaction network for video moment localization via language query

    Hao Wang, Zheng-Jun Zha, Liang Li, Dong Liu, and Jiebo Luo. Structured multi- level interaction network for video moment localization via language query. In CVPR, pages 7026–7035, 2021

    2021

  19. [22]

    Video2gif: Automatic generation of animated gifs from video

    Michael Gygli, Yale Song, and Liangliang Cao. Video2gif: Automatic generation of animated gifs from video. InCVPR, pages 1001–1009, 2016

    2016

  20. [23]

    Video highlight detection via deep ranking modeling

    Yifan Jiao, Xiaoshan Yang, Tianzhu Zhang, Shucheng Huang, and Changsheng Xu. Video highlight detection via deep ranking modeling. InImage and Video Technology: 8th Pacific-Rim Symposium, PSIVT 2017, Wuhan, China, November 20-24, 2017, Revised Selected Papers 8, pages 28–39. Springer, 2018

    2017

  21. [24]

    Joint visual and audio learning for video highlight detection

    Taivanbat Badamdorj, Mrigank Rochan, Yang Wang, and Li Cheng. Joint visual and audio learning for video highlight detection. InICCV, pages 8127–8137, 2021

    2021

  22. [25]

    Umt: Unified multi-modal transformers for joint video moment retrieval and highlight detection

    Ye Liu, Siyuan Li, Yang Wu, Chang-Wen Chen, Ying Shan, and Xiaohu Qie. Umt: Unified multi-modal transformers for joint video moment retrieval and highlight detection. InCVPR, pages 3042–3051, 2022

    2022

  23. [26]

    Attentive moment retrieval in videos

    Meng Liu, Xiang Wang, Liqiang Nie, Xiangnan He, Baoquan Chen, and Tat-Seng Chua. Attentive moment retrieval in videos. InThe 41st international ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval, pages 15–24, 2018

    2018

  24. [27]

    Localizing Moments in Video with Temporal Language

    Lisa Anne Hendricks, Oliver Wang, Eli Shechtman, Josef Sivic, Trevor Darrell, and Bryan Russell. Localizing moments in video with temporal language.arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01337, 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [28]

    Proposal-free video grounding with contextual pyramid network

    Kun Li, Dan Guo, and Meng Wang. Proposal-free video grounding with contextual pyramid network. InAAAI, volume 35, pages 1902–1910, 2021

    1902

  26. [29]

    Local-global video-text interac- tions for temporal grounding

    Jonghwan Mun, Minsu Cho, and Bohyung Han. Local-global video-text interac- tions for temporal grounding. InCVPR, pages 10810–10819, 2020. 14 X. Dong et al

    2020

  27. [30]

    Proposal-free temporal moment localization of a natural- language query in video using guided attention

    Cristian Rodriguez, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Fatemeh Sadat Saleh, Hongdong Li, and Stephen Gould. Proposal-free temporal moment localization of a natural- language query in video using guided attention. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, pages 2464–2473, 2020

    2020

  28. [31]

    Frame-wise cross-modal matching for video moment retrieval.IEEE Transactions on Multi- media, 24:1338–1349, 2021

    Haoyu Tang, Jihua Zhu, Meng Liu, Zan Gao, and Zhiyong Cheng. Frame-wise cross-modal matching for video moment retrieval.IEEE Transactions on Multi- media, 24:1338–1349, 2021

    2021

  29. [32]

    To find where you talk: Temporal sentence localization in video with attention based location regression

    Yitian Yuan, Tao Mei, and Wenwu Zhu. To find where you talk: Temporal sentence localization in video with attention based location regression. InAAAI, volume 33, pages 9159–9166, 2019

    2019

  30. [33]

    Span-based localizing network for natural language video localization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13931, 2020

    Hao Zhang, Aixin Sun, Wei Jing, and Joey Tianyi Zhou. Span-based localizing network for natural language video localization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13931, 2020

    work page arXiv 2004

  31. [34]

    Ranking domain-specific highlights by analyzing edited videos

    Min Sun, Ali Farhadi, and Steve Seitz. Ranking domain-specific highlights by analyzing edited videos. InECCV, pages 787–802. Springer, 2014

    2014

  32. [35]

    Tvsum: Sum- marizing web videos using titles

    Yale Song, Jordi Vallmitjana, Amanda Stent, and Alejandro Jaimes. Tvsum: Sum- marizing web videos using titles. InCVPR, pages 5179–5187, 2015

    2015

  33. [36]

    A deep ranking model for spatio-temporal highlight detection from a 360◦video

    Youngjae Yu, Sangho Lee, Joonil Na, Jaeyun Kang, and Gunhee Kim. A deep ranking model for spatio-temporal highlight detection from a 360◦video. InAAAI, volume 32, 2018

    2018

  34. [37]

    R2-tuning: Efficient image-to-video transfer learning for video temporal grounding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00801, 2024

    Ye Liu, Jixuan He, Wanhua Li, Junsik Kim, Donglai Wei, Hanspeter Pfister, and Chang Wen Chen. R2-tuning: Efficient image-to-video transfer learning for video temporal grounding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00801, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [38]

    An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recog- nition at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [39]

    Grounding action descriptions in videos.Trans- actions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1:25–36, 2013

    Michaela Regneri, Marcus Rohrbach, Dominikus Wetzel, Stefan Thater, Bernt Schiele, and Manfred Pinkal. Grounding action descriptions in videos.Trans- actions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1:25–36, 2013

    2013

  37. [40]

    Mh-detr: Video moment and highlight detection with cross-modal transformer

    Yifang Xu, Yunzhuo Sun, Benxiang Zhai, Youyao Jia, and Sidan Du. Mh-detr: Video moment and highlight detection with cross-modal transformer. InIJCNN, pages 1–8. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  38. [41]

    Knowing where to focus: Event-aware transformer for video grounding

    Jinhyun Jang, Jungin Park, Jin Kim, Hyeongjun Kwon, and Kwanghoon Sohn. Knowing where to focus: Event-aware transformer for video grounding. InICCV, pages 13846–13856, 2023

    2023

  39. [42]

    Query-dependent video representation for moment retrieval and highlight detec- tion

    WonJun Moon, Sangeek Hyun, SangUk Park, Dongchan Park, and Jae-Pil Heo. Query-dependent video representation for moment retrieval and highlight detec- tion. InCVPR, pages 23023–23033, 2023

    2023

  40. [43]

    Video summarization with long short-term memory

    Ke Zhang, Wei-Lun Chao, Fei Sha, and Kristen Grauman. Video summarization with long short-term memory. InECCV, pages 766–782. Springer, 2016

    2016

  41. [44]

    Learning trailer mo- ments in full-length movies with co-contrastive attention

    Lezi Wang, Dong Liu, Rohit Puri, and Dimitris N Metaxas. Learning trailer mo- ments in full-length movies with co-contrastive attention. InECCV, pages 300–316. Springer, 2020

    2020

  42. [45]

    Cross-category video highlight detection via set-based learning

    Minghao Xu, Hang Wang, Bingbing Ni, Riheng Zhu, Zhenbang Sun, and Changhu Wang. Cross-category video highlight detection via set-based learning. InICCV, pages 7970–7979, 2021

    2021

  43. [46]

    Mini-net: Multiple instance ranking network for video highlight detection

    Fa-Ting Hong, Xuanteng Huang, Wei-Hong Li, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Mini-net: Multiple instance ranking network for video highlight detection. InECCV, pages 345–360. Springer, 2020

    2020

  44. [47]

    Temporal cue guided video highlight detection with low-rank audio-visual fusion

    Qinghao Ye, Xiyue Shen, Yuan Gao, Zirui Wang, Qi Bi, Ping Li, and Guang Yang. Temporal cue guided video highlight detection with low-rank audio-visual fusion. InICCV, pages 7950–7959, 2021

    2021