REVIEW 1 cited by
Representations of Composite Braids and Invariants for Mutant Knots and Links in Chern-Simons Field Theories
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We show that any of the new knot invariants obtained from Chern-Simons theory based on an arbitrary non-abelian gauge group do not distinguish isotopically inequivalent mutant knots and links. In an attempt to distinguish these knots and links, we study Murakami (symmetrized version) $r$-strand composite braids. Salient features of the theory of such composite braids are presented. Representations of generators for these braids are obtained by exploiting properties of Hilbert spaces associated with the correlators of Wess-Zumino conformal field theories. The $r$-composite invariants for the knots are given by the sum of elementary Chern-Simons invariants associated with the irreducible representations in the product of $r$ representations (allowed by the fusion rules of the corresponding Wess-Zumino conformal field theory) placed on the $r$ individual strands of the composite braid. On the other hand, composite invariants for links are given by a weighted sum of elementary multicoloured Chern-Simons invariants. Some mutant links can be distinguished through the composite invariants, but mutant knots do not share this property. The results, though developed in detail within the framework of $SU(2)$ Chern-Simons theory are valid for any other non-abelian gauge group.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Construction of Lie algebra weight system kernel via Vogel algebra
Using Vogel's Lambda algebra, the authors construct and explicitly list the first Jacobi diagrams in the kernel of the sl_n weight system, up to order 10 for primitive diagrams.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.