Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.02274 v2 pith:C7DFHXJQ submitted 2022-11-04 cs.CY

Rally and WebScience: A Platform and Toolkit for Browser-Based Research on Technology and Society Problems

classification cs.CY
keywords researchrallybarriersbehaviorbrowser-baseddesignimplementationmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Empirical technology and society research is in a methodological crisis. Problems increasingly involve closed platforms, targeted content, and context-specific behavior. Prevailing research methods, such as surveys, tasks, and web crawls, pose design and ecological validity limitations. Deploying studies in participant browsers and devices is a promising direction. These vantage points can observe individualized experiences and implement UI interventions in real settings. We survey scholarship that uses these methods, annotating 284 sampled papers. Our analysis demonstrates their potential, but also recurring implementation barriers and shortcomings. We then present Rally and sdkName, a platform and toolkit for browser-based research. These systems lower implementation barriers and advance the science of measuring online behavior. Finally, we evaluate Rally and sdkName against our design goals. We report results from a one-month pilot study on news engagement, analyzing 4,466,200 webpage visits from 1,817 participants. We also present observations from interviews with researchers using these systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.