Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AI for Just Work: Constructing Diverse Imaginations of AI beyond "Replacing Humans"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.08720 v2 pith:CBKCUFJB submitted 2025-03-10 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords imaginationscommunitycriticaldiverseethicalvisionsworkassumptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

"why" we develop AI. Lacking critical reflections on the general visions and purposes of AI may make the community vulnerable to manipulation. In this position paper, we explore the "why" question of AI. We denote answers to the "why" question the imaginations of AI, which depict our general visions, frames, and mindsets for the prospects of AI. We identify that the prevailing vision in the AI community is largely a monoculture that emphasizes objectives such as replacing humans and improving productivity. Our critical examination of this mainstream imagination highlights its underpinning and potentially unjust assumptions. We then call to diversify our collective imaginations of AI, embedding ethical assumptions from the outset in the imaginations of AI. To facilitate the community's pursuit of diverse imaginations, we demonstrate one process for constructing a new imagination of "AI for just work," and showcase its application in the medical image synthesis task to make it more ethical. We hope this work will help the AI community to open critical dialogues with civil society on the visions and purposes of AI, and inspire more technical works and advocacy in pursuit of diverse and ethical imaginations to restore the value of AI for the public good.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ethical Medical Image Synthesis

    cs.CY 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A submission whose abstract and full text are two different papers on unrelated topics.

  2. The value of human and machine in machine-generated creative contents

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Machine-generated creative contents lack grounding in reality unless humans interpret them, so attributing creativity or imagination to the machine is an overclaim.

Pith tools