REVIEW 2 cited by
TAPVid-3D: A Benchmark for Tracking Any Point in 3D
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a new benchmark, TAPVid-3D, for evaluating the task of long-range Tracking Any Point in 3D (TAP-3D). While point tracking in two dimensions (TAP) has many benchmarks measuring performance on real-world videos, such as TAPVid-DAVIS, three-dimensional point tracking has none. To this end, leveraging existing footage, we build a new benchmark for 3D point tracking featuring 4,000+ real-world videos, composed of three different data sources spanning a variety of object types, motion patterns, and indoor and outdoor environments. To measure performance on the TAP-3D task, we formulate a collection of metrics that extend the Jaccard-based metric used in TAP to handle the complexities of ambiguous depth scales across models, occlusions, and multi-track spatio-temporal smoothness. We manually verify a large sample of trajectories to ensure correct video annotations, and assess the current state of the TAP-3D task by constructing competitive baselines using existing tracking models. We anticipate this benchmark will serve as a guidepost to improve our ability to understand precise 3D motion and surface deformation from monocular video. Code for dataset download, generation, and model evaluation is available at https://tapvid3d.github.io
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
E3D-Bench: A Benchmark for End-to-End 3D Geometric Foundation Models
E3D-Bench compares 16 3D geometric foundation models on depth, reconstruction, pose, and view-synthesis tasks with a unified evaluation toolkit.
-
BleedOrigin: Dynamic Bleeding Source Localization in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection via Dual-Stage Detection and Tracking
A new ESD bleeding-source dataset and a dual-stage detection-tracking framework report 96.85% onset, 70.24% source, and 96.11% tracking accuracy within defined tolerances.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.