Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Language Prompt for Autonomous Driving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.04379 v2 pith:CEN4AWJK submitted 2023-09-08 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords languagedrivingpromptcommunitydatanamednupromptobject
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A new trend in the computer vision community is to capture objects of interest following flexible human command represented by a natural language prompt. However, the progress of using language prompts in driving scenarios is stuck in a bottleneck due to the scarcity of paired prompt-instance data. To address this challenge, we propose the first object-centric language prompt set for driving scenes within 3D, multi-view, and multi-frame space, named NuPrompt. It expands nuScenes dataset by constructing a total of 40,147 language descriptions, each referring to an average of 7.4 object tracklets. Based on the object-text pairs from the new benchmark, we formulate a novel prompt-based driving task, \ie, employing a language prompt to predict the described object trajectory across views and frames. Furthermore, we provide a simple end-to-end baseline model based on Transformer, named PromptTrack. Experiments show that our PromptTrack achieves impressive performance on NuPrompt. We hope this work can provide some new insights for the self-driving community. The data and code have been released at https://github.com/wudongming97/Prompt4Driving.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MITS: A Large-Scale Multimodal Benchmark Dataset for Intelligent Traffic Surveillance

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new 170K-image, 5M-QA traffic surveillance benchmark improves LMM test scores by 27-83% after fine-tuning, but the gains are measured on the same pipeline that created the data.

  2. DriveQA: Passing the Driving Knowledge Test

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DriveQA is a new multimodal driving-knowledge benchmark showing that LLMs and MLLMs struggle with right-of-way, numerical traffic rules, and sign variations, with modest transfer gains to nuScenes and BDD.

  3. AD^2-Bench: A Hierarchical CoT Benchmark for MLLM in Autonomous Driving under Adverse Conditions

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AD^2-Bench is a new adverse-weather driving benchmark with hierarchical chain-of-thought annotations and LLM-based quality metrics; 12 MLLMs all scored below 60%.

  4. Impromptu VLA: Open Weights and Open Data for Driving Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 80K-clip dataset of unstructured driving scenarios with Q&A annotations improves VLA performance on NeuroNCAP and nuScenes benchmarks.

  5. Temporal Object Captioning for Street Scene Videos from LiDAR Tracks

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A rule-based pipeline converts LiDAR tracks into template captions of traffic dynamics, and training SwinBERT on them lowers the Visual Bias Measure across three datasets.

  6. Domain Specific Benchmarks for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review paper that organizes domain-specific MLLM benchmarks into an eight-discipline taxonomy, with summary tables and performance highlights.

  7. Vision-Language Models for Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of lightweight vision-language models for edge deployment, marred by citation errors, self-citation, and a lack of selection methodology.

Pith tools