Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Gravitational-wave dark siren cosmology systematics from galaxy weighting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14818 v2 pith:CIU3ZSVI submitted 2024-05-23 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEgr-qc

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords weightinggalaxiesincorrectsirencosmologydarkgalaxygravitational-wave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The detection of GW170817 and the measurement of its redshift from the associated electromagnetic counterpart provided the first gravitational wave determination of the Hubble constant ($H_0$), demonstrating the potential power of standard-siren cosmology. In contrast to this bright siren approach, the dark siren approach can be utilized for gravitational-wave sources in the absence of an electromagnetic counterpart: one considers all galaxies contained within the localization volume as potential hosts. When statistically averaging over the potential host galaxies, weighting them by physically-motivated properties (e.g., tracing star formation or stellar mass) could improve convergence. Using mock galaxy catalogs, we explore the impact of these weightings on the measurement of $H_0$. We find that incorrect weighting schemes can lead to significant biases due to two effects: the assumption of an incorrect galaxy redshift distribution, and preferentially weighting incorrect host galaxies during the inference. The magnitudes of these biases are influenced by the number of galaxies along each line of sight, the measurement uncertainty in the gravitational-wave luminosity distance, and correlations in the parameter space of galaxies. We show that the bias may be overcome from improved localization constraints in future GW detectors, a strategic choice of priors or weighting prescription, and by restricting the analysis to a subset of high-SNR events. We propose the use of hierarchical inference as a diagnostic of incorrectly-weighted prescriptions. Such approaches can simultaneously infer the correct weighting scheme and the values of the cosmological parameters, thereby mitigating the bias in dark siren cosmology due to incorrect host-galaxy weighting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The fault in our sirens: Hierarchical diagnosis of waveform systematics in Hubble-Lema\^itre constant measurements

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 5% subpopulation of high-mass, spin-precessing black hole binaries, poorly modeled by current waveforms, makes future dark-siren Hubble constant measurements unreliable, and a hierarchical variance diagnostic can de...

  2. Blinded Mock Data Challenge for Gravitational-Wave Cosmology-I: Assessing the Robustness of Methods Using Binary Black Holes Mass Spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A blinded mock data challenge shows that ignoring a mild redshift evolution in binary black hole masses biases the gravitational-wave Hubble constant measurement by about 1.5 sigma at LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA O4 sensitivity.

  3. A robust cosmic standard ruler from the cross-correlations of galaxies and dark sirens

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Cross-correlating dark siren distances with galaxy redshifts, the 'Peak Sirens' method traces the Hubble diagram, forecasting 7% H0 precision for LVK O5 and sub-percent for next-generation detectors.

Pith tools