Characterization of Normalizer of Lie Superalgebra and its Application to Control Theory

Aroonima Sahoo; Kishor Chandra Pati; Tofan Kumar Khuntia

arxiv: 2605.22694 · v1 · pith:CJQDUYBHnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🧮 math.OC · math-ph· math.MP

Characterization of Normalizer of Lie Superalgebra and its Application to Control Theory

Aroonima Sahoo , Kishor Chandra Pati , Tofan Kumar Khuntia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC math-phmath.MP

keywords Lie supergroupLie superalgebranormalizercontrol systemscontrollabilitybosonic variablesfermionic variablesvector fields

0 comments

The pith

Control systems on Lie supergroups are characterized by the normalizer of a Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses control problems on Lie supergroups as configuration spaces that include both bosonic and fermionic variables. It characterizes admissible control systems by taking the normalizer of the Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields inside the larger Lie superalgebra of all smooth vector fields on the supergroup. The work then examines the linear case in detail, derives a controllability criterion, and supplies concrete examples. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a structured algebraic test for systems whose dynamics mix commuting and anticommuting variables.

Core claim

The control systems are characterized using the normalizer of Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields in the Lie superalgebra of all smooth vector fields of Lie supergroup. Then, the linear control system is studied in detail and its controllability criterion is proposed along with suitable examples.

What carries the argument

The normalizer of the Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields inside the Lie superalgebra of all smooth vector fields on the Lie supergroup (the collection of vector fields whose Lie brackets with the subsuperalgebra remain inside it), which identifies the admissible controls.

If this is right

Admissible control vector fields are precisely the elements of this normalizer.
Controllability of linear systems reduces to a check formulated in terms of the normalizer.
The criterion applies directly to concrete linear examples on specific supergroups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same normalizer construction could be used to classify admissible controls for nonlinear systems on the same supergroups.
Results on controllability for ordinary Lie groups might transfer to the super case once the normalizer is computed.
The method opens a route to controllability questions in supersymmetric dynamical systems that mix ordinary and Grassmann variables.

Load-bearing premise

The normalizer of the chosen Lie subsuperalgebra inside the full vector-field superalgebra supplies a complete and usable characterization of admissible control systems on the Lie supergroup.

What would settle it

An explicit control system on a Lie supergroup whose generating vector fields lie outside the normalizer yet remains controllable, or one inside the normalizer that fails to be controllable.

read the original abstract

The dynamical systems having both bosonic and fermionic variables play an important role in the theory of supersymmetry. This article addresses the control problems including both bosonic and fermionic variables on Lie supergroup as the configuration space. Here, the control systems are characterized using the normalizer of Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields in the Lie superalgebra of all smooth vector fields of Lie supergroup. Then, the linear control system is studied in detail and its controllability criterion is proposed along with suitable examples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Extends the normalizer construction to Lie superalgebras for characterizing controls on supergroups and gives a linear controllability criterion, but the odd-vector-field adjustments are the part that needs checking.

read the letter

This paper lifts the normalizer of a Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields inside the full superalgebra of smooth vector fields on a Lie supergroup and uses it to characterize admissible control systems. For the linear case it states a controllability criterion and supplies examples. The move to include both bosonic and fermionic variables is the concrete new step; it takes a standard construction from ordinary Lie algebra control and applies it in the Z2-graded setting, which is a natural extension for supersymmetric models. The framework is set out clearly enough in the abstract and the examples should make the criterion usable for readers who already know the bosonic version. The soft spot is the implicit claim that the normalizer automatically respects the superbracket and parity when defining reachable sets. Odd vector fields anticommute, so their flows are not ordinary one-parameter groups and the classical rank condition does not carry over unchanged. If the paper only verifies the bosonic reduction and does not show explicitly that the criterion remains sufficient or necessary after the grading adjustments, that step stays unproven. The abstract alone does not settle whether this is handled or left as an assumption. Specialists in geometric control who work with Lie groups and want to see the super extension will find the criterion and examples worth reading. The paper shows honest engagement with the setup and the relevant literature, so it deserves a serious referee to inspect the derivations on the odd parts. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that control systems on Lie supergroups, incorporating both bosonic and fermionic variables, can be characterized via the normalizer of the Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields inside the full Lie superalgebra of smooth vector fields. It then specializes to linear control systems, proposes an explicit controllability criterion, and supplies examples.

Significance. If the normalizer construction is shown to correctly handle the Z2-grading, superbrackets, and flows generated by odd vector fields, the result would usefully extend classical geometric control theory (Lie-algebra rank conditions) to the super setting. This is relevant for supersymmetric systems, and the provision of a concrete criterion plus examples is a positive feature.

major comments (1)

[§4] §4 (linear control systems and controllability criterion): the proposed criterion is not accompanied by an explicit argument that the normalizer remains sufficient (or necessary) once the anticommutativity of odd elements and the non-standard flows they generate are taken into account. Classical rank conditions do not carry over verbatim, and no super-adjusted verification or counter-example check appears in the text; this step is load-bearing for the central claim.

minor comments (3)

Notation for even/odd components and the superbracket could be made more uniform across sections to avoid ambiguity when odd vector fields are present.
The examples would be strengthened by explicitly computing the normalizer in at least one case that includes a non-trivial odd generator.
A brief comparison with existing controllability results on ordinary Lie groups would help situate the super-extension.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive criticism of our manuscript. The single major comment raises an important point about the justification of the controllability criterion in the super setting, which we address below by committing to a targeted revision.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (linear control systems and controllability criterion): the proposed criterion is not accompanied by an explicit argument that the normalizer remains sufficient (or necessary) once the anticommutativity of odd elements and the non-standard flows they generate are taken into account. Classical rank conditions do not carry over verbatim, and no super-adjusted verification or counter-example check appears in the text; this step is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: We agree that an explicit super-adjusted argument is required and that the manuscript as written leaves this step insufficiently detailed. In the revised version we will insert a new paragraph (or short subsection) immediately after the statement of the criterion in §4. This addition will (i) recall the definition of the normalizer inside the full Lie superalgebra of vector fields, (ii) verify that the superbracket preserves the normalizer property when odd elements are present, and (iii) show that the flows generated by odd left-invariant vector fields remain compatible with the controllability condition on the underlying Lie supergroup. We will also include a brief verification step applied to one of the existing examples, confirming that the rank condition continues to hold after accounting for anticommutativity. These changes directly strengthen the load-bearing claim without altering the overall results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; normalizer application is standard and independent

full rationale

The paper applies the standard mathematical notion of the normalizer of a Lie subsuperalgebra within the full vector-field superalgebra to characterize admissible control systems on a Lie supergroup. The abstract and description indicate a derivation that begins from the definition of left-invariant vector fields and the normalizer construction, then proposes a controllability criterion for the linear case. No equations or steps are exhibited that reduce a claimed prediction or criterion back to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity by construction. The normalizer is an external algebraic object, not defined in terms of the control systems or reachable sets. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks in Lie superalgebra theory, with no load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatz smuggling visible in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard definitions of Lie supergroups, superalgebras, and left-invariant vector fields; no new free parameters or invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Lie supergroups and their left-invariant vector fields form a well-defined superalgebra that can serve as configuration space for control systems containing both bosonic and fermionic variables.
Standard background assumption in supersymmetry and supergeometry; invoked implicitly when the normalizer is defined inside the superalgebra of vector fields.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5621 in / 1276 out tokens · 44398 ms · 2026-05-22T04:05:57.689341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the control systems are characterized using the normalizer of Lie subsuperalgebra of left-invariant vector fields in the Lie superalgebra of all smooth vector fields of Lie supergroup

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

The zero curvature formulation of the sKdv equations

Ashok Das and Shibaji Roy. The zero curvature formulation of the sKdv equations. Journal of mathematical physics , 31(9):2145–2149, 1990

work page 1990
[2]

The theory of quantized fields

Julian Schwinger. The theory of quantized fields. i. Physical Review, 82(6):914, 1951

work page 1951
[3]

F. A. Berezin. The method of second quantization , volume 24. Elsevier, 2012

work page 2012
[4]

F. A. Berezin and G. I. Kac. Lie groups with commuting and anticommuting parameters. Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik , 11(3):311, 1970

work page 1970
[5]

Ferrara, B

S. Ferrara, B. Zumino, and Wess. Supergauge multiplets and superfields. Physics Letters B, 51(3):239–241, 1974

work page 1974
[6]

Arnowitt, P

R. Arnowitt, P. Nath, and B. Zumino. Superfield densities and action principle in curved superspace. Physics Letters B , 56(1):81–84, 1975

work page 1975
[7]

Anharmonic Grassmann oscillator

Robert Delbourgo, LM Jones, and M White. Anharmonic Grassmann oscillator. Physical Review D , 40(8):2716, 1989

work page 1989
[8]

Schrödinger equation with delta potential in superspace

Hendrik De Bie. Schrödinger equation with delta potential in superspace. Physics Letters A, 372(24):4350–4352, 2008

work page 2008
[9]

Orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras in superspace analogues of quantum Kepler problems

Rui Bin Zhang. Orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras in superspace analogues of quantum Kepler problems. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 280(2):545–562, 2008

work page 2008
[10]

Quantum group structure in a fermionic extension of the quantum harmonic oscillator

AJ Macfarlane and Shahn Majid. Quantum group structure in a fermionic extension of the quantum harmonic oscillator. Physics Letters B , 268(1):71–74, 1991

work page 1991
[11]

Hermite and Gegenbauer polynomials in superspace using Clifford analysis

Hendrik De Bie and Frank Sommen. Hermite and Gegenbauer polynomials in superspace using Clifford analysis. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 40(34):10441, 2007

work page 2007
[12]

Negative dimensional oscillators

Gerald V Dunne and IG Halliday. Negative dimensional oscillators. Nucl. Phys. B , 308(2- 3):589–618, 1988

work page 1988
[13]

Hamiltonian systems with even and odd Poisson brackets, duality of their conservation laws

DV Volkov, AI Pashnev, V A Soroka, and VI Tkach. Hamiltonian systems with even and odd Poisson brackets, duality of their conservation laws. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 44(70-72):35, 1986

work page 1986
[14]

On Hamilton systems with even and odd Poisson brackets

V A Soroka. On Hamilton systems with even and odd Poisson brackets. Letters in Mathe- matical Physics , 17(3):201–208, 1989. Research Article 19

work page 1989
[15]

I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko. Ideas and methods of supersymmetry and supergravity: A walk through superspace . CRC Press, Bristol, 1998

work page 1998
[16]

Deligne, P

P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D.S. Freed, L. C. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan, W. Morgan, D. R. Morrison, and E. Witten. Quantum fields and strings: A course for Mathematicians , volume 1. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

work page 1999
[17]

V. S. Varadarajan. Supersymmetry for mathematicians: An introduction , volume 11. Amer- ican Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

work page 2004
[18]

Gates, M

S. Gates, M. T. Grisaru, M. Rocek, and W. Siegeln. Superspace, or one thousand and one lessons in supersymmetry . Frontiers in Physics, Switzerland, 1983

work page 1983
[19]

D. Z. Freedman and P. Van Nieuwenhuizen. Properties of supergravity theory. Physical Review D , 14(4):912, 1976

work page 1976
[20]

Super-gauge transformations

Strathdee. Super-gauge transformations. In S. Ferrara, editor, Supersymmetry, pages 35–

work page
[21]

World Scientific, Singapore, 1987

work page 1987
[22]

Salam and A

A. Salam and A. Ali. Selected Papers of Abdus Salam:(with Commentary) . World Scientific, Singapore, 1994

work page 1994
[23]

A. Rogers. Supermanifolds:Theory and applications . World Scientific, Singapore, 2007

work page 2007
[24]

Supermanifolds

Bryce Seligman DeWitt. Supermanifolds. Cambridge University Press, Singapore, 1992

work page 1992
[25]

Introduction to the theory of supermanifolds

Dmitrii Aleksandrovich Leites. Introduction to the theory of supermanifolds. Russian Mathematical Surveys , 35(1):1, 1980

work page 1980
[26]

B. Kostant. Graded manifolds, graded Lie theory, and prequantization. In Differential geometrical methods in mathematical physics , pages 177–306. Springer, Berlin, 1977

work page 1977
[27]

System theory on group manifolds and coset spaces

Roger W Brockett. System theory on group manifolds and coset spaces. SIAM Journal on control, 10(2):265–284, 1972

work page 1972
[28]

Control systems on Lie groups

Velimir Jurdjevic and Héctor J Sussmann. Control systems on Lie groups. Journal of Differential equations, 12(2):313–329, 1972

work page 1972
[29]

Controllability of nonlinear systems

Héctor J Sussmann and Velimir Jurdjevic. Controllability of nonlinear systems. Journal of Differential Equations , 12, 1972

work page 1972
[30]

Control theory on Lie groups

Yu L Sachkov. Control theory on Lie groups. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 156(3):381– 439, 2009

work page 2009
[31]

Introduction to geometric control , volume 8

Yuri Sachkov. Introduction to geometric control , volume 8. Springer, Singapore, 2022

work page 2022
[32]

Control theory from the geometric viewpoint , vol- ume 87

Andrei A Agrachev and Yuri Sachkov. Control theory from the geometric viewpoint , vol- ume 87. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2013

work page 2013
[33]

Controllability of multi-trajectories on Lie groups

L Markus. Controllability of multi-trajectories on Lie groups. In Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the University of Warwick 1979/80, pages 250–265. Springer, 2006

work page 1980
[34]

Linear control systems on Lie groups and controllability

Victor Ayala and Juan Tirao. Linear control systems on Lie groups and controllability. In Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics , volume 64, pages 47–64. American Mathe- matical Society, 1999

work page 1999
[35]

Mathematical foundations of supersym- metry, volume 15

Claudio Carmeli, Lauren Caston, and Rita Fioresi. Mathematical foundations of supersym- metry, volume 15. European Mathematical Society, Switzerland, 2011. Research Article 20

work page 2011
[36]

Rittenberg

V. Rittenberg. A guide to Lie superalgebras. In P. Kramer and A. Rieckers, editors, Group theoretical methods in physics , pages 3–21, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978. Springer

work page 1978
[37]

Elementary construction of graded Lie groups

Vladimir Rittenberg and Manfred Scheunert. Elementary construction of graded Lie groups. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 19(3):709–713, 1978

work page 1978
[38]

The group with Grassmann structure uosp (1.2)

F A Berezin and VN Tolstoy. The group with Grassmann structure uosp (1.2). Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics , 78:409–428, 1981

work page 1981
[39]

Lie superalgebras

Victor G Kac. Lie superalgebras. Advances in mathematics , 26(1):8–96, 1977

work page 1977
[40]

Dictionary on Lie algebras and super- algebras

Luc Frappat, Paul Sorba, and Antonino Sciarrino. Dictionary on Lie algebras and super- algebras. Academic Press, London, 2000

work page 2000
[41]

Lie superalgebras and enveloping algebras

Ian Malcolm Musson. Lie superalgebras and enveloping algebras . American Mathematical Soc., Providence, RI, 2012

work page 2012
[42]

Controllability and observability of linear time-invariant control system on superspace

Aroonima Sahoo and Kishor Chandra Pati. Controllability and observability of linear time-invariant control system on superspace. Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems , 30(2):15, 2024

work page 2024
[43]

Controllability of linear control systems on Lie supergroup

Aroonima Sahoo and Kishor Chandra Pati. Controllability of linear control systems on Lie supergroup. In 2025 Eleventh Indian Control Conference (ICC) , pages 485–490. IEEE, 2025

work page 2025
[44]

Differential equations, Frobenius theorem and local flows on supermanifolds

Ugo Bruzzo and Roberto Cianci. Differential equations, Frobenius theorem and local flows on supermanifolds. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 18(3):417, 1985

work page 1985
[45]

Super manifolds

Katsumi Yagi. Super manifolds. Osaka Journal of Mathematics , 25(4):909–932, 1988

work page 1988

[1] [1]

The zero curvature formulation of the sKdv equations

Ashok Das and Shibaji Roy. The zero curvature formulation of the sKdv equations. Journal of mathematical physics , 31(9):2145–2149, 1990

work page 1990

[2] [2]

The theory of quantized fields

Julian Schwinger. The theory of quantized fields. i. Physical Review, 82(6):914, 1951

work page 1951

[3] [3]

F. A. Berezin. The method of second quantization , volume 24. Elsevier, 2012

work page 2012

[4] [4]

F. A. Berezin and G. I. Kac. Lie groups with commuting and anticommuting parameters. Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik , 11(3):311, 1970

work page 1970

[5] [5]

Ferrara, B

S. Ferrara, B. Zumino, and Wess. Supergauge multiplets and superfields. Physics Letters B, 51(3):239–241, 1974

work page 1974

[6] [6]

Arnowitt, P

R. Arnowitt, P. Nath, and B. Zumino. Superfield densities and action principle in curved superspace. Physics Letters B , 56(1):81–84, 1975

work page 1975

[7] [7]

Anharmonic Grassmann oscillator

Robert Delbourgo, LM Jones, and M White. Anharmonic Grassmann oscillator. Physical Review D , 40(8):2716, 1989

work page 1989

[8] [8]

Schrödinger equation with delta potential in superspace

Hendrik De Bie. Schrödinger equation with delta potential in superspace. Physics Letters A, 372(24):4350–4352, 2008

work page 2008

[9] [9]

Orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras in superspace analogues of quantum Kepler problems

Rui Bin Zhang. Orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras in superspace analogues of quantum Kepler problems. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 280(2):545–562, 2008

work page 2008

[10] [10]

Quantum group structure in a fermionic extension of the quantum harmonic oscillator

AJ Macfarlane and Shahn Majid. Quantum group structure in a fermionic extension of the quantum harmonic oscillator. Physics Letters B , 268(1):71–74, 1991

work page 1991

[11] [11]

Hermite and Gegenbauer polynomials in superspace using Clifford analysis

Hendrik De Bie and Frank Sommen. Hermite and Gegenbauer polynomials in superspace using Clifford analysis. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 40(34):10441, 2007

work page 2007

[12] [12]

Negative dimensional oscillators

Gerald V Dunne and IG Halliday. Negative dimensional oscillators. Nucl. Phys. B , 308(2- 3):589–618, 1988

work page 1988

[13] [13]

Hamiltonian systems with even and odd Poisson brackets, duality of their conservation laws

DV Volkov, AI Pashnev, V A Soroka, and VI Tkach. Hamiltonian systems with even and odd Poisson brackets, duality of their conservation laws. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 44(70-72):35, 1986

work page 1986

[14] [14]

On Hamilton systems with even and odd Poisson brackets

V A Soroka. On Hamilton systems with even and odd Poisson brackets. Letters in Mathe- matical Physics , 17(3):201–208, 1989. Research Article 19

work page 1989

[15] [15]

I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko. Ideas and methods of supersymmetry and supergravity: A walk through superspace . CRC Press, Bristol, 1998

work page 1998

[16] [16]

Deligne, P

P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D.S. Freed, L. C. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan, W. Morgan, D. R. Morrison, and E. Witten. Quantum fields and strings: A course for Mathematicians , volume 1. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

work page 1999

[17] [17]

V. S. Varadarajan. Supersymmetry for mathematicians: An introduction , volume 11. Amer- ican Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

work page 2004

[18] [18]

Gates, M

S. Gates, M. T. Grisaru, M. Rocek, and W. Siegeln. Superspace, or one thousand and one lessons in supersymmetry . Frontiers in Physics, Switzerland, 1983

work page 1983

[19] [19]

D. Z. Freedman and P. Van Nieuwenhuizen. Properties of supergravity theory. Physical Review D , 14(4):912, 1976

work page 1976

[20] [20]

Super-gauge transformations

Strathdee. Super-gauge transformations. In S. Ferrara, editor, Supersymmetry, pages 35–

work page

[21] [21]

World Scientific, Singapore, 1987

work page 1987

[22] [22]

Salam and A

A. Salam and A. Ali. Selected Papers of Abdus Salam:(with Commentary) . World Scientific, Singapore, 1994

work page 1994

[23] [23]

A. Rogers. Supermanifolds:Theory and applications . World Scientific, Singapore, 2007

work page 2007

[24] [24]

Supermanifolds

Bryce Seligman DeWitt. Supermanifolds. Cambridge University Press, Singapore, 1992

work page 1992

[25] [25]

Introduction to the theory of supermanifolds

Dmitrii Aleksandrovich Leites. Introduction to the theory of supermanifolds. Russian Mathematical Surveys , 35(1):1, 1980

work page 1980

[26] [26]

B. Kostant. Graded manifolds, graded Lie theory, and prequantization. In Differential geometrical methods in mathematical physics , pages 177–306. Springer, Berlin, 1977

work page 1977

[27] [27]

System theory on group manifolds and coset spaces

Roger W Brockett. System theory on group manifolds and coset spaces. SIAM Journal on control, 10(2):265–284, 1972

work page 1972

[28] [28]

Control systems on Lie groups

Velimir Jurdjevic and Héctor J Sussmann. Control systems on Lie groups. Journal of Differential equations, 12(2):313–329, 1972

work page 1972

[29] [29]

Controllability of nonlinear systems

Héctor J Sussmann and Velimir Jurdjevic. Controllability of nonlinear systems. Journal of Differential Equations , 12, 1972

work page 1972

[30] [30]

Control theory on Lie groups

Yu L Sachkov. Control theory on Lie groups. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 156(3):381– 439, 2009

work page 2009

[31] [31]

Introduction to geometric control , volume 8

Yuri Sachkov. Introduction to geometric control , volume 8. Springer, Singapore, 2022

work page 2022

[32] [32]

Control theory from the geometric viewpoint , vol- ume 87

Andrei A Agrachev and Yuri Sachkov. Control theory from the geometric viewpoint , vol- ume 87. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2013

work page 2013

[33] [33]

Controllability of multi-trajectories on Lie groups

L Markus. Controllability of multi-trajectories on Lie groups. In Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the University of Warwick 1979/80, pages 250–265. Springer, 2006

work page 1980

[34] [34]

Linear control systems on Lie groups and controllability

Victor Ayala and Juan Tirao. Linear control systems on Lie groups and controllability. In Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics , volume 64, pages 47–64. American Mathe- matical Society, 1999

work page 1999

[35] [35]

Mathematical foundations of supersym- metry, volume 15

Claudio Carmeli, Lauren Caston, and Rita Fioresi. Mathematical foundations of supersym- metry, volume 15. European Mathematical Society, Switzerland, 2011. Research Article 20

work page 2011

[36] [36]

Rittenberg

V. Rittenberg. A guide to Lie superalgebras. In P. Kramer and A. Rieckers, editors, Group theoretical methods in physics , pages 3–21, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978. Springer

work page 1978

[37] [37]

Elementary construction of graded Lie groups

Vladimir Rittenberg and Manfred Scheunert. Elementary construction of graded Lie groups. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 19(3):709–713, 1978

work page 1978

[38] [38]

The group with Grassmann structure uosp (1.2)

F A Berezin and VN Tolstoy. The group with Grassmann structure uosp (1.2). Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics , 78:409–428, 1981

work page 1981

[39] [39]

Lie superalgebras

Victor G Kac. Lie superalgebras. Advances in mathematics , 26(1):8–96, 1977

work page 1977

[40] [40]

Dictionary on Lie algebras and super- algebras

Luc Frappat, Paul Sorba, and Antonino Sciarrino. Dictionary on Lie algebras and super- algebras. Academic Press, London, 2000

work page 2000

[41] [41]

Lie superalgebras and enveloping algebras

Ian Malcolm Musson. Lie superalgebras and enveloping algebras . American Mathematical Soc., Providence, RI, 2012

work page 2012

[42] [42]

Controllability and observability of linear time-invariant control system on superspace

Aroonima Sahoo and Kishor Chandra Pati. Controllability and observability of linear time-invariant control system on superspace. Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems , 30(2):15, 2024

work page 2024

[43] [43]

Controllability of linear control systems on Lie supergroup

Aroonima Sahoo and Kishor Chandra Pati. Controllability of linear control systems on Lie supergroup. In 2025 Eleventh Indian Control Conference (ICC) , pages 485–490. IEEE, 2025

work page 2025

[44] [44]

Differential equations, Frobenius theorem and local flows on supermanifolds

Ugo Bruzzo and Roberto Cianci. Differential equations, Frobenius theorem and local flows on supermanifolds. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 18(3):417, 1985

work page 1985

[45] [45]

Super manifolds

Katsumi Yagi. Super manifolds. Osaka Journal of Mathematics , 25(4):909–932, 1988

work page 1988