REVIEW 7 cited by
Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Self-Consistency mitigates hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by sampling multiple reasoning paths,but it lacks a systematic approach to determine the optimal number of samples or select the most faithful rationale. To address this limitation, we introduce Reasoning-Aware Self-Consistency (RASC), a novel framework that enhances sampling efficiency and reasoning faithfulness by dynamically evaluating both outputs and rationales. RASC assesses the quality of reasoning and the consistency of answers for each generated sample, using these assessments to guide early stopping decisions and rationale selection. The framework employs criteria-based stopping and weighted majority voting, enabling more informed choices on when to halt sampling and which rationale to select. Our comprehensive experiments across diverse question-answering datasets demonstrate that RASC outperforms existing methods, reducing sample usage by approximately 70% while maintaining accuracy. Moreover, RASC facilitates the selection of high-fidelity rationales, thereby improving the faithfulness of LLM outputs. Our approach effectively addresses the efficiency-accuracy trade-off in LLM reasoning tasks, offering a new perspective for more nuanced, faithful, and effective utilization of LLMs in resource-constrained environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
What makes Reasoning Models Different? Follow the Reasoning Leader for Efficient Decoding
FoReaL-Decoding lets a strong reasoning model generate the first few tokens of each sentence and a weaker model complete the sentence, cutting theoretical FLOPs by 30-55% while retaining 86-100% of accuracy on four ma...
-
AlphaOne: Reasoning Models Thinking Slow and Fast at Test Time
A stochastic scheduling framework that modulates slow-to-fast reasoning in large reasoning models at test time, improving accuracy while reducing token usage.
-
Guided by Gut: Efficient Test-Time Scaling with Reinforced Intrinsic Confidence
Guided by Gut lets an LLM guide its own search using token-level confidence and step novelty, with a RL fine-tuning step to calibrate that confidence, achieving PRM-level accuracy at far lower compute and memory.
-
MARCO: Meta-Reflection with Cross-Referencing for Code Reasoning
MARCO combines cross-problem knowledge accumulation with cross-agent lesson sharing to improve LLM code reasoning at inference time.
-
Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs
The survey's L1/L2 taxonomy and benchmark show that current reasoning models waste compute on easy problems and underthink hard ones, motivating more adaptive inference.
-
Autonomous Control Leveraging LLMs: An Agentic Framework for Next-Generation Industrial Automation
LLM agents with validator-reprompting loops achieve 100% valid path recovery on random finite-state-machine benchmarks and temperature control close to PID on a lab dual-heater setup.
-
Survey of GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Executable Code
A review of roughly 60 papers and 9 industry respondents finds GPT-family models dominate automotive code generation while requirements handling lags due to confidentiality constraints.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.