pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.19668 · v2 · pith:CP3KKJ2Wnew · submitted 2025-12-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Are Primordial Black Holes Truly Fine-Tuned?

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords primordialblackfine-tuningholeabundancefine-tunedholeslarge
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Single-field inflationary models which generate primordial black holes through the enhancement of the curvature primordial power at small scales are commonly criticized and frequently dismissed because they require a large amount of fine-tuning in the parameters setting the ultra slow-roll phase. However, the standardly adopted definition of fine-tuning has a clear drawback: the more the primordial black hole abundance is small and cosmologically harmless, the larger the parameter space is fine-tuned. A well-defined indicator of fine-tuning should assign large values to scenarios requiring significant parameter adjustment to reproduce the desired primordial black hole abundance, while yielding values of order unity in cases governed by standard sensitivity. Motivated by such arguments, we use the (modified version of) Wilson's naturalness criterion for quantifying the fine-tuning and naturalness and we show that the primordial black hole models are not technically unnatural.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are Primordial Black Holes a Natural Dark Matter Candidate?

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PBH dark matter spans all naturalness tiers, with some mechanisms as natural as WIMPs or freeze-in particles, determined by abundance map structure rather than candidate type.