AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountability
read the original abstract
One of the most concrete measures to take towards meaningful AI accountability is to consequentially assess and report the systems' performance and impact. However, the practical nature of the "AI audit" ecosystem is muddled and imprecise, making it difficult to work through various concepts and map out the stakeholders involved in the practice. First, we taxonomize current AI audit practices as completed by regulators, law firms, civil society, journalism, academia, consulting agencies. Next, we assess the impact of audits done by stakeholders within each domain. We find that only a subset of AI audit studies translate to desired accountability outcomes. We thus assess and isolate practices necessary for effective AI audit results, articulating the observed connections between AI audit design, methodology and institutional context on its effectiveness as a meaningful mechanism for accountability.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How to Stop Playing Whack-a-Mole: Mapping the Ecosystem of Technologies Facilitating AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Images
The paper introduces the first comprehensive taxonomy and visualization of 11 categories of technologies facilitating AI-generated non-consensual intimate images, derived from synthesis of primary sources and demonstr...
-
MADP: A Multi-Agent Pipeline for Sustainable Document Processing with Human-in-the-Loop
MADP multi-agent pipeline with human-in-the-loop achieves 97% full automation on 955 real documents, 98.5% accuracy on ablation set, and 69-70% reductions in FTE, energy, and emissions versus manual processing.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.