Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

On the spectral stability of finite coverings

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Random finite coverings of a Ricci-bounded manifold almost surely add no new eigenvalues below the spectral thresholds, assuming the strong-convergence property (PRP) for the fundamental group.

desk verdict A substantial generalization of random-cover spectral stability to all Ricci-lower-bounded manifolds, with a removable-looking but real hypothesis mismatch in the written proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17466 v3 pith:CWCRJBHM submitted 2025-07-23 math.DG math.SP

Werner Ballmann , Sugata Mondal , Panagiotis Polymerakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.SP MSC 58J5053C2035P99
keywords LaplaceoperatorspectralstabilitygaprandomcoveringsfiniteRiemannianCheng-Yaugradientestimatepermutationrepresentationsessentialspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Random finite coverings of a manifold do not create new low-energy eigenvalues. Concretely, the paper proves: if $M$ is a complete connected Riemannian manifold with Ricci curvature bounded below and $\mu=\min\{\lambda_{\mathrm{ess}}(M),\lambda_0(\widetilde{M})\}>0$, then for every $\Lambda<\mu$ an $n$-sheeted covering of $M$ chosen uniformly at random has, with probability tending to one as $n\to\infty$, no Laplacian eigenvalues in $[0,\Lambda]$ beyond the eigenvalues it inherits from $M$, provided the fundamental group satisfies the representation-theoretic condition (PRP), known for free groups and for fundamental groups of closed orientable surfaces. This extends the 'uniform spectral gap for random covers' phenomenon, previously proved only for hyperbolic surfaces, to every Ricci-bounded manifold whose essential spectrum and universal-cover spectrum have a positive gap. The route is a parametrix built from the resolvent kernel of the universal cover, controlled by the Cheng-Yau gradient estimate instead of an explicit formula. A direct corollary is that every surface of finite type with negative Euler characteristic (orientable if closed), with curvature bounded below and $\lambda_0(\widetilde{S})>0$, has random finite covers that are spectrally stable below $\lambda_0(\widetilde{S})$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a parametrix $M_\varphi(\lambda)$ acting on the new part of the cover, an approximate resolvent with $(\Delta_{M_\varphi}-\lambda)M_\varphi(\lambda)=1+T_\varphi(\lambda)$ and $\|T_\varphi(\lambda)\|<1$; invertibility of $1+T_\varphi(\lambda)$ makes $\Delta-\lambda$ surjective, hence, by self-adjointness, injective on the new subspace, so no new eigenvalue can lie in $[0,\Lambda]$. The parametrix is the sum of an end piece, built from the Cheeger-Colding cutoff (Theorem 2.12) and the Dirichlet resolvent of $M\setminus K$ using $\lambda_{\mathrm{ess}}(M)>0$, and an interior piece built from the universal-cover resolvent kernel $G_\lambda(x,y)=\int_0^\infty e^{\lambda t}p_t(x,y)\,dt$ truncated by a $\Gamma$-equivariant cutoff $\chi_{T,y}$: $R_T(\lambda,x,y)=\chi_{T,y}(x)G_\lambda(x,y)$. Off the diagonal its error kernel $L_T(\lambda,x,y)=(\Delta_x-\lambda)R_T(\lambda,x,y)$ is controlled by Proposition 4.5, $|L_T(\lambda,x,y)|\le (C/T)G_\lambda(x,y)$, which follows from the Cheng-Yau gradient estimate applied to the positive eigenfunction $G_\lambda(\cdot,y)$ for $d(x,y)\ge 1/2$, with $C$ independent of $\lambda$ and $T$. $\lambda$-Lipschitz bounds on $G_\lambda$ and $\nabla_xG_\lambda$ (Lemma 5.1 and Proposition 5.2), again from the gradient estimate applied to the difference quotient $F=(G_{\lambda_2}-G_{\lambda_1})/(\lambda_2-\lambda_1)$, let the interval $[0,\Lambda]$ be reduced to a finite grid. At each grid point, finite-dimensional truncation of the Hilbert-Schmidt pieces turns the error norm into the operator inequality (1.2) between a sum $\sum a(\gamma)\otimes(\rho^0_n\circ\varphi)(\gamma)$ on $\mathbb{C}^r\otimes V^0_n$ and the regular-representation sum on $\mathbb{C}^r\otimes\ell^2(\Gamma)$; the finitely supported maps $a_i$ in Theorem A are these truncations, and (PRP)/(PRS) assert that the inequality holds for random, respectively for some, permutation representations.

What would settle it

On real hyperbolic space $\mathbb{H}^m$ the Green's function is explicit, so Proposition 4.5 can be checked numerically: compute the supremum of $\|\nabla_x G_\lambda(x,y)\|/G_\lambda(x,y)$ over $d(x,y)\ge 1/2$ and $\lambda\in[0,1/4-\delta]$, and verify that it is a finite constant depending only on $m$, the Ricci bound, and $1/4$; a divergence as $\lambda\uparrow 1/4$ would falsify the estimate and break the proof. To test the theorem itself, one would compute spectra of random covers of a fixed closed hyperbolic 3-manifold (whose fundamental group is free, hence (PRP) holds) for a fixed $\Lambda<1/4$: if a new eigenvalue in $[0,\Lambda]$ appears with probability bounded away from zero as the covering degree grows, Theorem B is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, on the paper's own terms, is Theorem A (proved as Theorem 7.6 in the greater generality of a finite intermediate covering of an infinite normal covering $\hat p:\hat M\to M$): spectral stability below $\mu$ is a finite, explicit condition on permutation representations of the deck group $\Gamma$. For any $0<\Lambda<\mu$ and $\varepsilon>0$, there are finitely many finitely supported matrix-valued maps $a_i:\Gamma\to\mathrm{Mat}_{r_i\times r_i}(\mathbb{C})$ such that every finite cover $M_\varphi$, attached as $\Gamma\backslash(\hat M\times\{1,\dots,n\})$ to a homomorphism $\varphi:\Gamma\to S_n$, is automatically $[0,\Lambda]$-stable whenever $\varphi$ satisfies the operator-norm inequality (1.2) with each $a_i$: the norm of $\sum_\gamma a_i(\gamma)\otimes(\rho^0_n\circ\varphi)(\gamma)$ on $\mathbb{C}^{r_i}\otimes V^0_n$ is at most the norm of the same sum against the regular representation on $\mathbb{C}^{r_i}\otimes\ell^2(\Gamma)$, up to $\varepsilon$. The Laplacian on the 'new' subspace $L^2_{\mathrm{new}}(M_\varphi)$ then has no spectrum in $[0,\Lambda]$, which is exactly $[0,\Lambda]$-stability. Theorem B follows because (PRP) guarantees the inequality holds asymptotically almost surely for uniform random $\varphi$, and (PRP) is known for finitely generated free groups and for closed orientable surface groups. The new analytic input is that the universal-cover resolvent kernel $G_\lambda(x,y)=\int_0^\infty e^{\lambda t}p_t(x,y)\,dt$ needs no explicit formula: a uniform gradient bound, supplied by the Cheng-Yau estimate, suffices, so the result is independent of any special structure of $\hat M$ beyond its positive spectral bottom.

Load-bearing premise

Everything hangs on one analytic estimate (Proposition 4.5): away from the diagonal, the gradient of the Green's function of the Laplacian on the universal cover is bounded by a fixed multiple of the Green's function itself, with the multiple independent of the energy parameter; if that multiple grows without bound as the energy approaches the bottom of the universal-cover spectrum, the parametrix norm bounds collapse and this proof would not go through.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Corollary C: for any surface $S$ of finite type with negative Euler characteristic, orientable if closed, with a complete metric of curvature bounded below and $\lambda_0(\widetilde{S})>0$, finite coverings of $S$ are asymptotically almost surely $[0,\Lambda]$-stable for every $\Lambda<\lambda_0(\widetilde{S})$; in particular closed hyperbolic surfaces are covered for every $\Lambda<1/4$.
  • The results reach hyperbolic manifolds outside the surface world: random finite covers of Schottky manifolds and of quasi-Fuchsian threefolds of type one are asymptotically almost surely stable below the universal-cover bottom (Remark F).
  • When the fundamental group satisfies (PRS) instead, as limit groups do, the manifold admits a sequence of stable finite coverings of degree tending to infinity, and in fact a tower of them (Theorems D and G).
  • Because $\lambda_0$ is an eigenvalue of multiplicity equal to the number of connected components, the paper notes that $[0,\Lambda]$-stability with $\Lambda\ge\lambda_0(M)$ forces the covering to be connected, so the random covers of Theorem B are almost surely connected.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof gives no rate for the probability that a random cover is unstable; a natural quantitative follow-up is a concentration or large-deviation bound showing that this probability decays exponentially in the covering degree for closed hyperbolic surfaces, going beyond the qualitative almost-sure statement.
  • The mechanism suggests the same bottom-of-spectrum rigidity for other operators with a positive Green's kernel and Cheng-Yau-type gradient control, notably Schrodinger operators with a potential or Hodge Laplacians on forms under curvature assumptions, where random covers should likewise show no new low eigenvalues.
  • The almost-sure statement is plausibly the optimal generic picture at the bottom: classical constructions produce specific covers of closed hyperbolic surfaces with eigenvalues arbitrarily close to zero, so unstable covers must be exponentially rare exceptions rather than the generic case, a contrast the present methods do not quantify.
  • Conceptually, the paper casts the Riemannian random-cover problem as the metric analogue of random lifts of graphs, with the regular representation governing the new spectrum and the universal cover playing the role of the infinite tree; the new point is that no tree-like structure is needed, only a positive spectral bottom, which one could test by simulating random covers of compact hyperbolic 3-
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general parametrix method, following Hide and Magee, to prove that finite coverings of a complete connected Riemannian manifold M are spectrally stable on [0, Λ] provided Λ is below min{λ_ess(M), λ_0(\widetilde M)} and the fundamental group satisfies a strong-convergence condition (PRP) for permutation representations. The main technical theorem, Theorem 7.6, reduces [0, Λ]-stability to finitely many inequalities (1.2) for finitely supported matrix-valued maps; Theorems A, B, and D and the corollaries then follow from known (PRP)/(PRS) results for free groups, surface groups, and limit groups. The analytic core is a parametrix built from the resolvent on the universal cover using Cheng–Yau gradient estimates and a Cheeger–Colding cutoff, patched together with an end parametrix and an interior parametrix.

Significance. If the Section 6 hypothesis gap is resolved, the result is a substantial generalization of the uniform spectral gap results for hyperbolic surfaces to arbitrary complete manifolds with a Ricci lower bound and positive µ, contingent on the group-theoretic (PRP)/(PRS) inputs. The paper's main novelty is the elimination of explicit heat-kernel asymptotics on the universal cover by using Cheng–Yau estimates; this is a genuinely useful technical contribution. The dependence on external deep results—Bordenave–Collins [6], Magee–Puder–van Handel [22], and Louder–Magee [17]—is clearly stated, and the final theorems are sharply formulated. However, as written the proof of the central theorem relies on a standing assumption in Section 6 that is not assumed in the statements, so the verification is conditional.

major comments (2)
  1. [§6 and Theorem 7.6] Section 6 opens with the standing assumption that M has bounded sectional curvature, but Theorem 7.6 (and consequently Theorems A, B, D and the corollaries) is stated under only a Ricci lower bound. The proof of Theorem 7.6 uses (6.7), the operators L^int_φ(λ) and L^K_φ(λ), and the norm bounds obtained from Corollary 7.4, all of which are built inside Section 6; no paragraph discharges the stronger sectional-curvature hypothesis. In particular, Proposition 6.4 invokes [15, Lemma 5.4] via the assertion that its proof 'works in our setting without any changes'; that lemma is not stated, and the needed finite-support/finite-translate property for the kernel of R_{T,n}(λ)(1−χ^-_K) is load-bearing for the boundedness of the interior parametrix and for the reduction of L^T_φ(λ) to a finite sum over S in Section 7. As written, the main theorem is not proved at the stated level of generality. The authors should either prove the finiteness statement directly under the hypotheses of Theorem 7.6, using properness of complete M and local finiteness of the deck action, or explicitly restrict the main theorems to bounded sectional curvature.
  2. [§5, proof of Proposition 5.2] The displayed chain in the proof of Proposition 5.2 contains an unjustified step: after applying Theorem 2.13 to (∆−λ1)F, one obtains c1(∆−λ1)F + λ1∥∇F∥, and the line '≤ c1∆F + λ0∥∇F∥ − c1F' is not a valid consequence (the negative term should be −c1λ1F, and for λ1<1 there is no reason for the right-hand side to dominate the left-hand side). The intended bound can be recovered directly: since Gλ2=(∆−λ1)F ≤ ∆F and ∆F>0, one has Gλ2 ≤ ∆F ≤ m∥Hess F∥, so the hypotheses of Theorem 2.13 hold for F with the constant max(mc1, λ0). Please correct the proof, because Proposition 5.2 feeds Corollary 5.3, Lemma 7.1, and the uniform-in-λ estimate (7.5) used in Corollary 7.4.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§6, proof of Proposition 6.4] In the estimate for ∥R_{T,n}(λ)(1−χ^-_K)f∥^2, the factor ∥R_T(λ)∥_{L^2} should be squared; the displayed inequality is dimensionally wrong and can fail when ∥R_T(λ)∥>1.
  2. [§2, Eq. (2.1)] Equation (2.1) is typeset with malformed norm symbols; it should read ∥∇f∥^2_{L^2} / ∥f∥^2_{L^2}.
  3. [§1.2 and §2.3] The reference to Cheeger–Colding appears as 'Theorem 6.3' in Section 1.2 and as 'Theorem 6.33' in Theorem 2.12; please make the numbering consistent.
  4. [§4, Proposition 4.5] The application of Theorem 2.13 to G_λ is compressed; please state explicitly the ball radius (e.g., ρ=1/4 with balls centered at x) and the constant C=λ0(\widetilde M) used in the hypotheses, so that the claimed independence of λ and T is transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem reduces spectral stability to external representation-theoretic inequalities and genuine analytic estimates, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central result, Theorem B, is an immediate consequence of Theorem A, whose proof constructs end and interior parametrices (Sections 3 and 6) and then shows that if φ satisfies inequality (1.2), the operator 1 + Lint_φ(λ) + LK_φ(λ) is invertible on L2_new(Mφ), forcing Δ − λ to be injective on L2_new(Mφ) for λ ∈ [0, Λ]. Inequality (1.2) is an external representation-theoretic input, not a restatement of spectral stability: (PRP) is cited to Bordenave–Collins [6] for free groups and to Magee–Puder–van Handel [22] for surface groups, and (PRS) to Louder–Magee [17]. None of these inputs contains the spectral-stability conclusion, and the paper fits no parameter to data; the passage from (1.2) to eigenvalue exclusion is obtained through explicit kernel estimates (Proposition 4.5, Lemma 5.1, Proposition 5.2) and operator norm controls (Proposition 7.3, Corollary 7.4). The self-citations [2], [3], [24], and [25] are contextual or auxiliary: [2] is cited only for examples of instability, and [25] underlies Theorem 2.6 used in Corollaries C and E to verify assumption (1.1) for surfaces, whereas the main theorems assume (1.1) and do not depend on that verification. The paper explicitly relies on Cheng–Yau and Cheeger–Colding estimates under Ricci lower bounds, and these are external results not derived from the target theorem. The noted mismatch between Section 6's standing assumption of bounded sectional curvature and Theorem 7.6's Ricci-only statement is a correctness gap rather than circularity: invoking (6.7) under a stronger hypothesis than stated would not make the conclusion identical to the inputs, and the proof could still succeed if the missing finiteness argument were supplied. Overall, the central claim has independent analytic and probabilistic content, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conditional theorems rest on two pillars it does not itself prove: the strong convergence of permutation representations (PRP/PRS) imported from [6], [22], [17], and the geometric estimates of Cheng-Yau and Cheeger-Colding. The parametrix construction is the paper's contribution and reduces spectral stability to these inputs. No parameters are fitted to data and no new geometric entities are invented.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Ricci curvature of M is bounded from below, Ric >= -(m-1)b^2.
    Stated in the abstract and conventions (Section 2.4); required for Cheeger-Colding cutoffs (Theorem 2.12) and Cheng-Yau gradient estimates (Theorem 2.13).
  • domain assumption mu = min{lambda_ess(M), lambda_0(tilde M)} > 0, and 0 < Lambda < mu.
    Assumption (1.1) in the introduction and (6.1) in Section 6; this is the spectral window in which stability is claimed.
  • domain assumption The inequality (1.2) holds for all phi in the relevant class (Theorem A), or (PRP)/(PRS) holds for Gamma (Theorems B and D).
    Theorems A and B are conditional on (1.2)/(PRP); the paper imports (PRP) for free groups from Bordenave-Collins [6] and for surface groups from Magee-Puder-van Handel [22], and (PRS) for limit groups from Louder-Magee [17]. These are external inputs, not derived in this paper.
  • standard math Cheng-Yau gradient estimate (Theorem 2.13) applies to the resolvent kernel G_lambda(.,y) and its difference quotients, yielding the kernel bounds in Propositions 4.5 and 5.2.
    The estimate is cited as [14, Theorem 6] and restated; its application to G_lambda is asserted rather than fully verified in the paper.
  • standard math Cheeger-Colding cutoff functions (Theorem 2.12) exist with the stated gradient and Laplacian bounds.
    Cited as [12, Theorem 6.33]; used to construct the end and interior cutoffs.
  • standard math Theorem 2.5: lambda_ess(M) = sup lambda_0(M\K) over compact domains K.
    Used in Section 3 to choose the compact domain K with controlled Dirichlet bottom, linking lambda_ess to the end parametrix.
  • standard math [15, Lemma 5.4]: the support of the truncated integral kernels intersects only finitely many Gamma-translates of a fundamental domain.
    Imported from Hide-Magee; the paper states its proof works in the present setting without changes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the spectral stability of finite coverings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CWCRJBHM

@misc{pith2026250717466,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the spectral stability of finite coverings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CWCRJBHM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17466}
}
abstract

We prove the non-existence of new eigenvalues in $[0,\Lambda]$ for specific and random finite coverings of a complete and connected Riemannian manifold $M$ with Ricci curvature bounded from below, where $\Lambda$ is any positive number below the essential spectrum of $M$ and the spectrum of the universal cover of $M$, provided the representation theory of the fundamental group of $M$ satisfies certain conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bass notes of random hyperbolic surfaces of large genus

    math.SP 2026-07 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of recent results proving that random hyperbolic surfaces of large genus have near-optimal spectral gaps, after Hide–Magee, Anantharaman–Monk, and Hide–Macera–Thomas.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [6]

    Bordenave and B

    C. Bordenave and B. Collins, Eigenvalues of random lifts and polynomials of ran- dom permutation matrices. Annals of Math. 190 (2019), 811–875

    work page 2019

  2. [22]

    Magee, D

    M. Magee, D. Puder, and R. van Handel, Strong convergence of uniformly random permutation representations of surface groups. arXiv:2504.08988v2

    arXiv

  3. [17]

    Louder and M

    L. Louder and M. Magee, Strongly convergent unitary representations of limit groups. J. Funct. Anal. 288 (2025), no. 6, Paper No. 110803. With an appendix by M. Magee and W. Hide. 26 WERNER BALLMANN, SUGATA MONDAL, AND PANAGIOTIS POLYMERAKIS

    work page 2025

  4. [1]

    Ballmann, H

    W. Ballmann, H. Matthiesen, and P. Polymerakis, Bottom of spectra and amenabil- ity of coverings. Geometric analysis—in honor of Gang Tian ’s 60th birthday. Progr. Math. 333, 17–35, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [2]

    Ballmann and S

    W. Ballmann and S. Mondal, Spectral instability of coverings. Int. Math. Research Notices (2025), no. 1, Paper No. rnae259, 20 pp

    work page 2025

  6. [3]

    Ballmann and P

    W. Ballmann and P. Polymerakis, On the essential spectrum of differential oper- ators over geometrically finite orbifolds. J. Differential Geom. 127 2024, no. 1, 1–34

    work page 2024

  7. [4]

    Baumslag, On generalised free products, Math

    G. Baumslag, On generalised free products, Math. Z. 78 (1962), no. 3, 423—438

    work page 1962

  8. [5]

    Baumslag, Residually free groups, Proc

    B. Baumslag, Residually free groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 17 (1967), 402— 418

    work page 1967

Show all 27 references
  1. [7]

    B. H. Bowditch, Geometrical finiteness with variable negative curvature, Duke Math. J. 77 (1995), no. 1, 229–274

    1995

  2. [8]

    Bowen, Hausdorff dimension of quasicircles

    R. Bowen, Hausdorff dimension of quasicircles. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., 50 (1979), 11–25

    1979

  3. [9]

    Brooks, The fundamental group and the spectrum of the Laplacian

    R. Brooks, The fundamental group and the spectrum of the Laplacian. Comment. Math. Helv. 56 (1981), no. 4, 581–598

    1981

  4. [10]

    Brooks, The spectral geometry of a tower of coverings

    R. Brooks, The spectral geometry of a tower of coverings. J. Differential Geom. 23 (1986), no. 1, 97–107

    1986

  5. [11]

    Brooks and E

    R. Brooks and E. Makover. Random construction of Riemann surfaces. J. Differ- ential Geom., 68 (2004), no. 1, 121–157

    2004

  6. [12]

    Cheeger and T

    J. Cheeger and T. H. Colding, Lower bounds on Ricci curvature and the almost rigidity of warped products. Ann. of Math. (2) 144 (1996), no. 1, 189–237

    1996

  7. [13]

    Cheeger, W

    J. Cheeger, W. Jiang, and A. Naber, Rectifiability of singular sets of noncollapsed limit spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. Ann. Math. (2) 193 (2021), no. 2, 407–538

    2021

  8. [14]

    Cheng and S.T

    S.Y. Cheng and S.T. Yau, Differential equations on Riemannian manifolds and their geometric applications. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 28 (1975), no. 3, 333–354

    1975

  9. [15]

    Hide and M

    W. Hide and M. Magee, Near optimal spectral gaps for hyperbolic surfaces. Ann. of Math. (2) 198 (2023), no. 2, 791–824

    2023

  10. [16]

    W. Hide, J. Moy, and F. Naud, On the spectral gap of negatively curved surface covers. arXiv:2502.10733 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Magee, Strong convergence of unitary and permutation representations of dis- crete groups

    M. Magee, Strong convergence of unitary and permutation representations of dis- crete groups. arXiv:2503.21619v1

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    Magee and F

    M. Magee and F. Naud, Explicit spectral gaps for random covers of Riemann sur- faces. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 132 (2020), 137–179

    2020

  13. [20]

    Magee and F

    M. Magee and F. Naud, Extension of Alon’s and Friedman’s conjectures to Schottky surfaces. arXiv:2106.02555 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Magee, F

    M. Magee, F. Naud, and D. Puder, A random cover of a compact hyperbolic surface has spectral gap 3 16 − ε. Geom. Funct. Anal. 32 (2022), no. 3, 595–661

    2022

  15. [23]

    Moy, Spectral gap of random covers of negatively curved noncompact surfaces

    J. Moy, Spectral gap of random covers of negatively curved noncompact surfaces. arXiv:2505.07056 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Polymerakis, Coverings preserving the bottom of the spectrum.J

    P. Polymerakis, Coverings preserving the bottom of the spectrum.J. Spectr. Theory 12 (2022) no. 3, 993–1022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Polymerakis, On the spectrum of differential operators under Riemannian cov- erings

    P. Polymerakis, On the spectrum of differential operators under Riemannian cov- erings. J. Geom. Anal. 30 (2020), no. 3, 3331–3370

    2020

  18. [26]

    Randol, Small eigenvalues of the Laplace operator on compact Riemann surfaces

    B. Randol, Small eigenvalues of the Laplace operator on compact Riemann surfaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 (1974), 996–1000

    1974

  19. [27]

    Sullivan, Related aspects of positivity in Riemannian geometry

    D. Sullivan, Related aspects of positivity in Riemannian geometry. J. Differential Geom., 25 (1987), no. 3, 327–351. WB: Max Planck Institute for Mathematics, Vivatsgasse 7, 53111 Bonn Email address : hwbllmnn@mpim-bonn.mpg.de SM: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Univ...

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.