Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Rashomon ratio of infinite hypothesis sets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.17746 v1 pith:CWXML63P submitted 2024-04-27 cs.LG math.PRstat.ML

classification cs.LGmath.PRstat.ML
keywords rashomonratiofamilyclassifierclassificationclassifiersinfinitelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given a classification problem and a family of classifiers, the Rashomon ratio measures the proportion of classifiers that yield less than a given loss. Previous work has explored the advantage of a large Rashomon ratio in the case of a finite family of classifiers. Here we consider the more general case of an infinite family. We show that a large Rashomon ratio guarantees that choosing the classifier with the best empirical accuracy among a random subset of the family, which is likely to improve generalizability, will not increase the empirical loss too much. We quantify the Rashomon ratio in two examples involving infinite classifier families in order to illustrate situations in which it is large. In the first example, we estimate the Rashomon ratio of the classification of normally distributed classes using an affine classifier. In the second, we obtain a lower bound for the Rashomon ratio of a classification problem with a modified Gram matrix when the classifier family consists of two-layer ReLU neural networks. In general, we show that the Rashomon ratio can be estimated using a training dataset along with random samples from the classifier family and we provide guarantees that such an estimation is close to the true value of the Rashomon ratio.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 80 papers on model multiplicity, with a new taxonomy of developer choices and a formal distinction between multiplicity, uncertainty, and variance.

Pith tools