Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Autonomous Large Language Model Agents Enabling Intent-Driven Mobile GUI Testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08649 v1 pith:CXA5ZPSD submitted 2023-11-15 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords testingdroidagentcoveragelevelrealisticrelevantaccountactivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

GUI testing checks if a software system behaves as expected when users interact with its graphical interface, e.g., testing specific functionality or validating relevant use case scenarios. Currently, deciding what to test at this high level is a manual task since automated GUI testing tools target lower level adequacy metrics such as structural code coverage or activity coverage. We propose DroidAgent, an autonomous GUI testing agent for Android, for semantic, intent-driven automation of GUI testing. It is based on Large Language Models and support mechanisms such as long- and short-term memory. Given an Android app, DroidAgent sets relevant task goals and subsequently tries to achieve them by interacting with the app. Our empirical evaluation of DroidAgent using 15 apps from the Themis benchmark shows that it can set up and perform realistic tasks, with a higher level of autonomy. For example, when testing a messaging app, DroidAgent created a second account and added a first account as a friend, testing a realistic use case, without human intervention. On average, DroidAgent achieved 61% activity coverage, compared to 51% for current state-of-the-art GUI testing techniques. Further, manual analysis shows that 317 out of the 374 autonomously created tasks are realistic and relevant to app functionalities, and also that DroidAgent interacts deeply with the apps and covers more features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DragonCrawl: A Generative, Intent-Based Framework for Scalable Mobile End-to-End Testing

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DragonCrawl uses GPT-4o-based intent reasoning, multimodal end-state detection, and backend tool calling to run 1,013 mobile regression tests in CI/CD, achieving over 91% pass rates and cutting test maintenance effort.

  2. KG-RAG: Enhancing GUI Agent Decision-Making via Knowledge Graph-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.MA 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    KG-RAG builds a vector database of intent-scored navigation paths from UI transition graphs and retrieves them during task execution, reporting 75.8% success on DroidTask, 8.9 points above AutoDroid.

  3. Temac: Multi-Agent Collaboration for Automated Web GUI Testing

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM system layered on an existing crawler raises code coverage on six web applications and surfaces 445 unique faults on 20 real-world sites.

Pith tools