Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BoolQuestions: Does Dense Retrieval Understand Boolean Logic in Language?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.12235 v1 pith:CZX4D6J4 submitted 2024-11-19 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords booleanretrievaldenselanguagelogicsystemscurrenttext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dense retrieval, which aims to encode the semantic information of arbitrary text into dense vector representations or embeddings, has emerged as an effective and efficient paradigm for text retrieval, consequently becoming an essential component in various natural language processing systems. These systems typically focus on optimizing the embedding space by attending to the relevance of text pairs, while overlooking the Boolean logic inherent in language, which may not be captured by current training objectives. In this work, we first investigate whether current retrieval systems can comprehend the Boolean logic implied in language. To answer this question, we formulate the task of Boolean Dense Retrieval and collect a benchmark dataset, BoolQuestions, which covers complex queries containing basic Boolean logic and corresponding annotated passages. Through extensive experimental results on the proposed task and benchmark dataset, we draw the conclusion that current dense retrieval systems do not fully understand Boolean logic in language, and there is a long way to go to improve our dense retrieval systems. Furthermore, to promote further research on enhancing the understanding of Boolean logic for language models, we explore Boolean operation on decomposed query and propose a contrastive continual training method that serves as a strong baseline for the research community.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LogiCoL: Logically-Informed Contrastive Learning for Set-based Dense Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dense retriever trained with subset and exclusion constraints on logically related query pairs improves recall on queries with AND, OR, and NOT connectives.

Pith tools