Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.03640 v2 pith:D2WTZRYX submitted 2021-05-08 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords explanationsexplanationmethodmodelsperturbationsetsspaceused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We build on abduction-based explanations for ma-chine learning and develop a method for computing local explanations for neural network models in natural language processing (NLP). Our explanations comprise a subset of the words of the in-put text that satisfies two key features: optimality w.r.t. a user-defined cost function, such as the length of explanation, and robustness, in that they ensure prediction invariance for any bounded perturbation in the embedding space of the left out words. We present two solution algorithms, respectively based on implicit hitting sets and maximum universal subsets, introducing a number of algorithmic improvements to speed up convergence of hard instances. We show how our method can be con-figured with different perturbation sets in the em-bedded space and used to detect bias in predictions by enforcing include/exclude constraints on biased terms, as well as to enhance existing heuristic-based NLP explanation frameworks such as Anchors. We evaluate our framework on three widely used sentiment analysis tasks and texts of up to100words from SST, Twitter and IMDB datasets,demonstrating the effectiveness of the derived explanations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasons

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SST trains models to produce concise sufficient reasons as an extra output, yielding faster and often smaller explanations than post-hoc methods like Anchors and SIS.

Pith tools