REVIEW 3 cited by
SciLitLLM: How to Adapt LLMs for Scientific Literature Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Scientific literature understanding is crucial for extracting targeted information and garnering insights, thereby significantly advancing scientific discovery. Despite the remarkable success of Large Language Models (LLMs), they face challenges in scientific literature understanding, primarily due to (1) a lack of scientific knowledge and (2) unfamiliarity with specialized scientific tasks. To develop an LLM specialized in scientific literature understanding, we propose a hybrid strategy that integrates continual pre-training (CPT) and supervised fine-tuning (SFT), to simultaneously infuse scientific domain knowledge and enhance instruction-following capabilities for domain-specific tasks.cIn this process, we identify two key challenges: (1) constructing high-quality CPT corpora, and (2) generating diverse SFT instructions. We address these challenges through a meticulous pipeline, including PDF text extraction, parsing content error correction, quality filtering, and synthetic instruction creation. Applying this strategy, we present a suite of LLMs: SciLitLLM, specialized in scientific literature understanding. These models demonstrate promising performance on scientific literature understanding benchmarks. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We present an effective framework that integrates CPT and SFT to adapt LLMs to scientific literature understanding, which can also be easily adapted to other domains. (2) We propose an LLM-based synthesis method to generate diverse and high-quality scientific instructions, resulting in a new instruction set -- SciLitIns -- for supervised fine-tuning in less-represented scientific domains. (3) SciLitLLM achieves promising performance improvements on scientific literature understanding benchmarks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
AdaParse: An Adaptive Parallel PDF Parsing and Resource Scaling Engine
AdaParse adaptively assigns each PDF to a cheap or expensive parser based on predicted output quality, achieving high throughput with comparable accuracy to state-of-the-art parsers.
-
LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and Efficient
BenchMaker automatically builds multiple-choice benchmarks from assessment demands and matches human benchmarks' ranking power (0.967 Pearson correlation with MMLU-Pro across 12 LLMs) at $0.005 per item.
-
Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey
A survey of LLM-based automated scholarly paper review, cataloging models, datasets, methods, and publisher policies as of 2023-2024.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.