Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Figurative Language in Recognizing Textual Entailment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.01195 v2 pith:DDT7IBFO submitted 2021-06-02 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords figurativelanguagedatasetsmodelscaptureentailmentrecognizingtextual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a collection of recognizing textual entailment (RTE) datasets focused on figurative language. We leverage five existing datasets annotated for a variety of figurative language -- simile, metaphor, and irony -- and frame them into over 12,500 RTE examples.We evaluate how well state-of-the-art models trained on popular RTE datasets capture different aspects of figurative language. Our results and analyses indicate that these models might not sufficiently capture figurative language, struggling to perform pragmatic inference and reasoning about world knowledge. Ultimately, our datasets provide a challenging testbed for evaluating RTE models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Vision-Language Models for Knowledge-Grounded Data Annotation of Memes

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CM50, a 33k-meme dataset with GPT-4o-generated annotations, and mtrCLIP, a fine-tuned CLIP model, together improve meme-text retrieval on MemeCap over the original CLIP.

Pith tools