pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06340 · v1 · pith:DEHFFSOVnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · physics.plasm-ph· physics.space-ph

Minor Ions as a Diagnostic of Solar Wind Heating: Inverted Mass-to-Charge Scaling in Imbalanced Turbulence

Michael F. Zhang , Evan L. Yerger , Matthew W. Kunz , Jonathan Squire This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR physics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph
keywords solar windAlfvenic turbulenceminor ionsproton cyclotron waveshelicity barrierplasma heatingimbalanced turbulenceplasma beta
0
0 comments X

The pith

Imbalanced Alfvénic turbulence generates flat proton-cyclotron wave spectra that invert minor-ion heating dependence on mass-to-charge ratio.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that when Alfvénic turbulence in the solar wind is imbalanced, the helicity barrier stops the turbulent cascade and creates high-frequency proton-cyclotron waves. These waves produce unusually flat electric-energy spectra over scales resonant with minor ions. Steeper spectra heat ions more strongly at higher mass-to-charge ratios, but flat spectra with exponent less than 2 invert this dependence so heating decreases with rising A_i/Z_i. Simulations at plasma betas from 1 down to 1/16 confirm the inverted scaling, with the largest perpendicular heating of minor ions appearing in the lowest-beta imbalanced run and matching low-coronal observations.

Core claim

When Alfvénic turbulence is imbalanced, its cascade to ion-Larmor scales is throttled by the helicity barrier. This barrier ultimately leads to high-frequency proton-cyclotron waves, both oblique and parallel, the latter of which produce very flat electric-energy spectra (E_E⊥ ∼ k_∥^{-η} with η<2) over the range of scales that are cyclotron resonant with minor ions. While steeper spectra lead to a positive correlation of heating with A_i/Z_i, the shallower spectra cause the dependence to invert, with Q_i ∝ Q_p A_i (A_i/Z_i)^{η−2}.

What carries the argument

The helicity barrier in imbalanced turbulence, which generates parallel proton-cyclotron waves that produce flat electric-energy spectra controlling resonant minor-ion heating.

If this is right

  • Minor-ion heating rates follow (A_i/Z_i)^a in both balanced and imbalanced cases across the simulated betas.
  • Heating is strongest and most perpendicular in the lowest-beta imbalanced run, reaching T_perp_O5+/T_perp_p ≈40 and T_perp/T_parallel ≈10.
  • Inverted heating trends indicate a history of large cross helicity and steep transition-range spectra.
  • Future minor-ion measurements can test the association between inverted trends and parallel proton-cyclotron wave power.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Minor-ion temperature trends could serve as a remote diagnostic of turbulence imbalance even when direct cross-helicity measurements are unavailable.
  • The same spectral flattening may alter the overall transition-range dissipation rate in imbalanced regimes.

Load-bearing premise

Quasilinear theory remains valid for resonant heating by the parallel proton-cyclotron waves without significant corrections from nonlinear effects, collisions, or solar-wind expansion.

What would settle it

Observations of intervals where minor-ion thermal speeds decrease with increasing mass-to-charge ratio but lack large cross helicity or enhanced parallel proton-cyclotron wave power would falsify the proposed link.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06340 by Evan L. Yerger, Jonathan Squire, Matthew W. Kunz, Michael F. Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Minor-ion to proton temperature ratios, normal￾ized by the ion-to-proton mass ratio Ai, plotted against ion￾to-proton mass-to-charge ratio Ai/Zi. Data correspond to ACE/SWICS measurements at 1 au for a collisionally young solar-wind interval, adapted from fig. 3 of Tracy et al. (2016). sipation in balanced turbulence therefore favor the per￾pendicular heating of ions by non-resonant stochastic heating (Cha… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top panel: Dispersion relations for oblique PCWs, ωk∥,O (black), and parallel PCWs, ωk∥,P (red), plot￾ted as functions of |k∥|, with k∥ < 0 in our convention. Dotted lines show Ωi − |k∥|w∥ for protons (purple), alphas (green), and O5+ (orange); their intersections with ωk∥ give the resonant wavenumbers k∥,res satisfying Eq. (5) for oblique or parallel waves. Horizontal dotted lines correspond to w∥ = 0; th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left panel shows time evolution of z ± rms in red/blue and σc in yellow (right axis). Middle and right panels show mass-normalized temperatures and temperature anisotropies, respectively, of protons and minor ions as indicated by colors on legend, throughout the imbalanced (top) and balanced (bottom) simulations at β = 1 (solid), β = 0.3 (dotted), and β = 1/16 (dashed) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectra of perpendicular magnetic-field fluctuations, EB⊥ = EBy + EBz , in (k⊥, k∥) space, with logarithmic contours and color bar in units of mp0np0v 2 A0/2, for the β = 1 (left column), β = 0.3 (middle column), and β = 1/16 (right column) imbalanced simulations at intermediate stages of the evolution (t = 7τA) (middle row) and saturation t = 13τA (bottom row). Equivalent spectra for the balanced simulati… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Imbalanced simulation VDFs, fi(w∥, w⊥), in peculiar velocity (w∥, w⊥) of protons (top row), alphas (middle row), and O5+ (bottom row) at t = 13τA for βp0 = 1 (left column), βp0 = 0.3 (middle column), and βp0 = 1/16 (right column), with logarithmic color bar and contours. The axes are scaled to the initial thermal speeds of each respective species, vth,i0, and w∥ is taken with respect to the bulk plasma (pr… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top and middle: Total heating rates for each ion species (different colors; see legend), normalized by the box volume, time-averaged energy injection, and the time￾dependent fits from the bottom panel, in the imbalanced (top) and balanced (middle) simulations. The thinner black lines show the fitted values of the constant of proportionality, K. Because the fitted power laws collapse the minor-ion heating r… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Electric power spectra in k∥, EE⊥ (black, solid), at t = 2τA (top row), t = 7τA (middle row), and t = 13τA (bottom row) for the imbalanced simulations with βp0 = 1 (left column), βp0 = 0.3 (middle column), and βp0 = 1/16 (right column). The spectra are computed from the spectra in (k⊥, k∥) space in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Alfv\'enic turbulence is vital to powering the solar wind and corona, yet eludes a comprehensive understanding of the kinetic processes by which it dissipates. Minor ions are sensitive tracers of these processes, showing extreme perpendicular temperatures and mass-weighted temperature trends that can either correlate or anticorrelate with mass-to-charge ratio, $A_i/Z_i$. We use a combination of quasilinear theory and 3D hybrid-kinetic simulations to explain these features and their correlations with properties of turbulence in the fast solar wind. When Alfv\'enic turbulence is imbalanced, its cascade to ion-Larmor scales is throttled by the helicity barrier. This barrier ultimately leads to high-frequency proton-cyclotron waves (PCWs), both oblique and parallel, the latter of which produce very flat electric-energy spectra ($\mathcal{E}_{E_{\perp}}\sim k_\parallel^{-\eta}$ with $\eta<2$) over the range of scales that are cyclotron resonant with minor ions. While steeper spectra lead to a positive correlation of heating with $A_i/Z_i$, the shallower spectra cause the dependence to invert, with $Q_i\propto Q_{\mathrm{p}}A_i(A_i/Z_i)^{\eta-2}$. Six simulations of balanced and imbalanced turbulence spanning $\beta_{\rm p0}=\{1,0.3,1/16\}$ corroborate this prediction, showing minor-ion heating rates that follow $(A_i/Z_i)^a$. Minor-ion heating is strongest and most perpendicular in our lowest $\beta_{\rm p0}=1/16$ simulation of imbalanced turbulence, reaching $T_{\perp{\rm O}^{5+}}/T_{\perp{\rm p}}\approx40$ and $T_{\perp{\rm O}^{5+}}/T_{\parallel{\rm O}^{5+}}\approx10$, consistent with low-coronal observations. Future minor-ion measurements should test whether intervals in which minor-ion thermal speeds decrease with increasing mass-to-charge ratio are associated with a history of large cross helicity, enhanced power in parallel PCWs, and a steep transition-range spectrum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that imbalanced Alfvénic turbulence is throttled at ion-Larmor scales by the helicity barrier, which generates both oblique and parallel high-frequency proton-cyclotron waves. The parallel component produces flat electric-energy spectra (E_{E⊥} ∼ k_∥^{-η} with η < 2) over cyclotron-resonant scales for minor ions. Substituting this spectrum into the quasilinear cyclotron-resonance heating integral yields the inverted scaling Q_i ∝ Q_p A_i (A_i/Z_i)^{η-2}. Six 3D hybrid-kinetic simulations (balanced and imbalanced cases at β_p0 = {1, 0.3, 1/16}) confirm minor-ion heating rates follow (A_i/Z_i)^a, with extreme perpendicular heating (T_⊥O^{5+}/T_⊥p ≈ 40) at the lowest β.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies an explicit, testable link between turbulence imbalance, the resulting parallel-PCW spectrum, and observed minor-ion temperature trends in the fast solar wind. The derivation of the exponent directly from the spectral index η (rather than a free fit) and its reproduction across multiple β_p0 values in hybrid-kinetic runs constitute a clear strength, offering a falsifiable observational signature for intervals of large cross helicity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theory derivation] Quasilinear theory section: the inverted scaling Q_i ∝ Q_p A_i (A_i/Z_i)^{η-2} is obtained by direct substitution of the flat parallel-PCW spectrum into the cyclotron-resonance integral; however, the manuscript does not demonstrate that quasilinear theory remains valid once nonlinear orbit modifications, solar-wind expansion, and collisions (all omitted from the hybrid-kinetic runs) are restored at the resonant k_∥.
  2. [Numerical results] Simulation results section: the six runs show the (A_i/Z_i)^a trend and flat E_E⊥(k_∥), but the manuscript should report a direct, quantitative comparison between the simulated heating rates and the quasilinear prediction evaluated at the measured η for each species to establish that the spectral shape, rather than other simulation features, is the controlling factor.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Discussion] The abstract states that future measurements should test the association with steep transition-range spectra, but the manuscript does not define or show how the transition-range spectral index is measured in the simulations.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the value of η extracted from each imbalanced run so readers can verify the predicted exponent without consulting the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of our quasilinear analysis and simulation results. Below we respond to each major comment and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theory derivation] Quasilinear theory section: the inverted scaling Q_i ∝ Q_p A_i (A_i/Z_i)^{η-2} is obtained by direct substitution of the flat parallel-PCW spectrum into the cyclotron-resonance integral; however, the manuscript does not demonstrate that quasilinear theory remains valid once nonlinear orbit modifications, solar-wind expansion, and collisions (all omitted from the hybrid-kinetic runs) are restored at the resonant k_∥.

    Authors: Hybrid-kinetic simulations do incorporate nonlinear orbit modifications via the kinetic treatment of particle trajectories in the self-consistent fields. The omitted elements are solar-wind expansion and collisions. We agree that full validation under these conditions lies beyond the present study. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section acknowledging these limitations and noting that the consistency between QL predictions and simulation trends across β values supports the utility of the approach as an interpretive tool. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results] Simulation results section: the six runs show the (A_i/Z_i)^a trend and flat E_E⊥(k_∥), but the manuscript should report a direct, quantitative comparison between the simulated heating rates and the quasilinear prediction evaluated at the measured η for each species to establish that the spectral shape, rather than other simulation features, is the controlling factor.

    Authors: We concur that such a comparison would strengthen the link to the spectral shape. We will include in the revised manuscript a direct comparison: for each simulation, we will evaluate the QL heating ratio using the measured η and compare it quantitatively to the simulated Q_i/Q_p values for the minor ions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; analytic scaling tested by independent simulations

full rationale

The paper derives the inverted heating scaling Q_i ∝ Q_p A_i (A_i/Z_i)^{η-2} by substituting the flat parallel-PCW spectrum (η<2) into the standard quasilinear cyclotron-resonance integral; this is a direct mathematical step, not a self-definition or fit. The six hybrid-kinetic simulations independently evolve imbalanced turbulence, measure the emergent spectrum η, and compute minor-ion heating rates, confirming the predicted (A_i/Z_i)^a dependence without using the target scaling as an input. The helicity-barrier premise is likewise tested by the same runs rather than resting solely on prior self-citations. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external simulation benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard plasma-physics assumptions about quasilinear resonant heating and the existence of the helicity barrier; no new particles or forces are introduced. The only free parameters are the three discrete initial β_p0 values chosen to sample different regimes.

free parameters (1)
  • β_p0
    Initial proton beta values {1, 0.3, 1/16} are selected by hand to span the parameter space of interest.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quasilinear theory accurately describes resonant cyclotron heating by the parallel PCWs
    Invoked to obtain the explicit Q_i scaling from the electric-field spectrum.
  • domain assumption The helicity barrier in imbalanced turbulence produces the flat η<2 spectra at ion-cyclotron scales
    Central premise linking imbalance to the spectral shape that drives the inversion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5943 in / 1542 out tokens · 23701 ms · 2026-06-27T23:26:41.991098+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2025, ApJ, 990, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade9b0

    Adkins, T., Meyrand, R., & Squire, J. 2025, ApJ, 990, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade9b0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade9b0 2025

  2. [2]

    Schekochihin, A. A. 2023, PhRvX, 13, 021014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.021014 20Zhang et al

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.021014 2023

  3. [3]

    J., Asbridge, J

    Bame, S. J., Asbridge, J. R., Feldman, W. C., & Kearney, P. D. 1974, SoPh, 35, 137, doi: 10.1007/BF00156963

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00156963 1974

  4. [4]

    2000, RvGeo, 38, 247, doi: 10.1029/1999RG000063 —

    Bochsler, P. 2000, RvGeo, 38, 247, doi: 10.1029/1999RG000063 —. 2007, A&ARv, 14, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-006-0002-x

    work page doi:10.1029/1999rg000063 2000

  5. [5]

    1985, JGR, 90, 10779, doi: 10.1029/JA090iA11p10779

    Bochsler, P., Geis, J., & Joos, R. 1985, JGR, 90, 10779, doi: 10.1029/JA090iA11p10779

    work page doi:10.1029/ja090ia11p10779 1985

  6. [6]

    2006, PhRvL, 96, 115002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.115002

    Boldyrev, S. 2006, PhRvL, 96, 115002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.115002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.115002 2006

  7. [7]

    A., Bale, S

    Bowen, T. A., Bale, S. D., Chandran, B. D. G., et al. 2024, NatAs, 8, 482, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02186-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02186-4 2024

  8. [8]

    A., Cohen, B

    Byers, J. A., Cohen, B. I., Condit, W. C., & Hanson, J. D. 1978, JCoPh, 27, 363, doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90016-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(78)90016-5 1978

  9. [9]

    S., Arzamasskiy, L., & Kunz, M

    Cerri, S. S., Arzamasskiy, L., & Kunz, M. W. 2021, ApJ, 916, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfbde

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfbde 2021

  10. [10]

    Chandran, B. D. G. 2010, ApJ, 720, 548, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/548

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/1/548 2010

  11. [11]

    2010a, ApJ, 720, 503, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/503

    Germaschewski, K. 2010a, ApJ, 720, 503, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/503

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/1/503

  12. [12]

    Chandran, B. D. G., Pongkitiwanichakul, P., Isenberg, P. A., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 722, 710, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/710

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/1/710

  13. [13]

    Chen, C. H. K. 2016, JPlPh, 82, 535820602, doi: 10.1017/S0022377816001124

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377816001124 2016

  14. [14]

    Cranmer, S. R. 2002, SSRv, 101, 229, doi: 10.1023/A:1020840004535 —. 2009, LRSP, 6, 3, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2009-3

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1020840004535 2002

  15. [15]

    R., Panasyuk, A

    Cranmer, S. R., Panasyuk, A. V., & Kohl, J. L. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1480, doi: 10.1086/586890

    work page doi:10.1086/586890 2008

  16. [16]

    1968, JATP, 30, 1313, doi: 10.1016/S0021-9169(68)91158-6

    Gendrin, R. 1968, JATP, 30, 1313, doi: 10.1016/S0021-9169(68)91158-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0021-9169(68)91158-6 1968

  17. [17]

    1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    Goldreich, P., & Sridhar, S. 1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    work page doi:10.1086/175121 1995

  18. [18]

    S., Bale, S

    Halekas, J. S., Bale, S. D., Berthomier, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd769

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd769 2023

  19. [19]

    W., & Nielson, C

    Hewett, D. W., & Nielson, C. W. 1978, JCoPh, 29, 219, doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90153-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(78)90153-5 1978

  20. [20]

    Hollweg, J. V. 1999, JGR, 104, 24781, doi: 10.1029/1999JA900300

    work page doi:10.1029/1999ja900300 1999

  21. [21]

    V., & Isenberg, P

    Hollweg, J. V., & Isenberg, P. A. 2002, JGRA, 107, 1147, doi: 10.1029/2001JA000270

    work page doi:10.1029/2001ja000270 2002

  22. [22]

    S., Forman, M., & Oughton, S

    Horbury, T. S., Forman, M., & Oughton, S. 2008, PhRvL, 101, 175005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.175005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.175005 2008

  23. [23]

    Isenberg, P. A. 1984, JGR, 89, 6613, doi: 10.1029/JA089iA08p06613 —. 2004, JGRA, 109, A03101, doi: 10.1029/2002JA009449 —. 2012, PhPl, 19, 032116, doi: 10.1063/1.3697721

    work page doi:10.1029/ja089ia08p06613 1984

  24. [24]

    A., & Hollweg, J

    Isenberg, P. A., & Hollweg, J. V. 1983, JGR, 88, 3923, doi: 10.1029/JA088iA05p03923

    work page doi:10.1029/ja088ia05p03923 1983

  25. [25]

    A., & Lee, M

    Isenberg, P. A., & Lee, M. A. 1996, JGR, 101, 11055, doi: 10.1029/96JA00293

    work page doi:10.1029/96ja00293 1996

  26. [26]

    A., Lee, M

    Isenberg, P. A., Lee, M. A., & Hollweg, J. V. 2001, JGR, 106, 5649, doi: 10.1029/2000JA000099

    work page doi:10.1029/2000ja000099 2001

  27. [27]

    A., & Vasquez, B

    Isenberg, P. A., & Vasquez, B. J. 2011, ApJ, 731, 88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/88

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/2/88 2011

  28. [28]

    Quasi-linear theory of perpendicular ion heating by critically balanced turbulence

    Johnston, Z., & Squire, J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03472, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03472

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03472 2025

  29. [29]

    C., Lazarus, A

    Kasper, J. C., Lazarus, A. J., & Gary, S. P. 2008, PhRvL, 101, 261103, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.261103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.261103 2008

  30. [30]

    C., Stevens, M

    Kasper, J. C., Stevens, M. L., Lazarus, A. J., Steinberg, J. T., & Ogilvie, K. W. 2007, ApJ, 660, 901, doi: 10.1086/510842

    work page doi:10.1086/510842 2007

  31. [31]

    Kawazura, Y., Barnes, M., & Schekochihin, A. A. 2019, PNAS, 116, 771, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812491116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1812491116 2019

  32. [32]

    F., & Engelmann, F

    Kennel, C. F., & Engelmann, F. 1966, PhFl, 9, 2377, doi: 10.1063/1.1761629

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1761629 1966

  33. [33]

    G., & Chandran, B

    Klein, K. G., & Chandran, B. D. G. 2016, ApJ, 820, 47, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/47

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/47 2016

  34. [34]

    1997, SoPh, 171, 345, doi: 10.1023/A:1004943213433

    Guhathakurta, M. 1997, SoPh, 171, 345, doi: 10.1023/A:1004943213433

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1004943213433 1997

  35. [35]

    L., Noci, G., Cranmer, S

    Kohl, J. L., Noci, G., Cranmer, S. R., & Raymond, J. C. 2006, A&ARv, 13, 31, doi: 10.1007/s00159-005-0026-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-005-0026-7 2006

  36. [36]

    W., Stone, J

    Kunz, M. W., Stone, J. M., & Bai, X.-N. 2014, JCoPh, 259, 154, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.11.035

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.11.035 2014

  37. [37]

    Landi, E., & Cranmer, S. R. 2009, ApJ, 691, 794, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/794

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/1/794 2009

  38. [38]

    T., Raines, J

    Livi, S., Lepri, S. T., Raines, J. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346304

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346304 2023

  39. [39]

    A., & Chandran, B

    Mallet, A., Schekochihin, A. A., & Chandran, B. D. G. 2015, MNRAS, 449, L77, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv021

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv021 2015

  40. [40]

    2012, SSRv, 172, 23, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9734-z

    Marsch, E. 2012, SSRv, 172, 23, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9734-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9734-z 2012

  41. [41]

    H., Goldstein, M

    Matthaeus, W. H., Goldstein, M. L., & Roberts, D. A. 1990, JGR, 95, 20673, doi: 10.1029/JA095iA12p20673

    work page doi:10.1029/ja095ia12p20673 1990

  42. [42]

    W., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al

    McIntosh, S. W., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al. 2011, Natur, 475, 477, doi: 10.1038/nature10235

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10235 2011

  43. [43]

    Simon, P. A. 2025, PhRvX, 15, 031008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.15.031008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.031008 2025

  44. [44]

    A., & Dorland, W

    Meyrand, R., Squire, J., Schekochihin, A. A., & Dorland, W. 2021, JPlPh, 87, 535870301, doi: 10.1017/S0022377821000489

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377821000489 2021

  45. [45]

    K., Raouafi, N

    Mostafavi, P., Jagarlamudi, V. K., Raouafi, N. E., et al. 2025, ApJL, 991, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0732

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0732 2025

  46. [46]

    C., Jagarlamudi, V

    Mostafavi, P., Allen, R. C., Jagarlamudi, V. K., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347134

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347134 2024

  47. [47]

    T., & Stawarz, J

    Panchal, U., Wicks, R. T., & Stawarz, J. E. 2025, ApJ, 983, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbfff Inverted minor-ion heating in imbalanced turbulence21

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbfff 2025

  48. [48]

    J., Badman, S

    Rivera, Y. J., Badman, S. T., Stevens, M. L., et al. 2024, Science, 385, 962, doi: 10.1126/science.adk6953

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adk6953 2024

  49. [49]

    J., Klein, K

    Rivera, Y. J., Klein, K. G., Wang, J. H., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L60, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfa97

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfa97 2025

  50. [50]

    D., & Shevchenko, V

    Rowlands, J., Shapiro, V. D., & Shevchenko, V. I. 1966, JETP, 23, 651

    1966

  51. [51]

    A., Kawazura, Y., & Barnes, M

    Schekochihin, A. A., Kawazura, Y., & Barnes, M. A. 2019, JPlPh, 85, 905850303, doi: 10.1017/S0022377819000345

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377819000345 2019

  52. [52]

    Squire, J., Meyrand, R., & Kunz, M. W. 2023, ApJ, 957, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0779

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0779 2023

  53. [53]

    W., et al

    Squire, J., Meyrand, R., Kunz, M. W., et al. 2022, NatAs, 6, 715, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01624-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01624-z 2022

  54. [54]

    Stix, T. H. 1992, Waves in plasmas (American Institute of Physics)

    1992

  55. [55]

    J., Kasper, J

    Tracy, P. J., Kasper, J. C., Raines, J. M., et al. 2016, PhRvL, 116, 255101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.255101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.255101 2016

  56. [56]

    G., & Maruca, B

    Verscharen, D., Klein, K. G., & Maruca, B. A. 2019, LRSP, 16, 5, doi: 10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0 von Steiger, R., Schwadron, N. A., Fisk, L. A., et al. 2000, JGR, 105, 27217, doi: 10.1029/1999JA000358

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0 2019

  57. [57]

    H., Horbury, T

    Wang, J. H., Horbury, T. S., Matteini, L., & Trotta, D. 2025, ApJL, 978, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9ddd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9ddd 2025

  58. [58]

    L., Chandran, B

    Yerger, E. L., Chandran, B. D. G., David, V., Bowen, T. A., & Bale, S. D. 2026, JPlPh, in press. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25117

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    F., Kunz, M

    Zhang, M. F., Kunz, M. W., Squire, J., & Klein, K. G. 2025, ApJ, 979, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad95fc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad95fc 2025