Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Origin of the Multi-Phase Interstellar Medium: the Effects of Turbulence and Magnetic Field

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that turbulent mixing and magnetic pressure fluctuations—not just thermal equilibrium—produce and sustain the unstable neutral medium, which can occupy at least half the interstellar volume under realistic conditions.

desk verdict Solid 3D MHD multiphase ISM simulations with interesting anisotropic structure-function results, but the ≥50% UNM fraction is not secure because thermal conduction is excluded and no convergence tests are shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07423 v1 pith:DJYJ7ZJA submitted 2025-05-12 astro-ph.GA

Yue Hu This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords multiphaseinterstellarmediumunstableneutralmagnetohydrodynamicturbulenceturbulentmixingthermalinstabilityphasediagramvelocitystructurefunctionmagneticfields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks why a substantial fraction of interstellar gas sits at intermediate temperatures, between the warm neutral medium (WNM) and the cold neutral medium (CNM). Using 3D turbulent hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic simulations of a 100-pc box, it argues that this unstable neutral medium (UNM) is actively produced and sustained by turbulent mixing, which smooths the phase diagram and flattens the pressure-density relation, and by magnetic pressure fluctuations, which resist full condensation into cold gas. The paper reports that under realistic conditions—magnetic fields of about 3–5 microgauss and velocity dispersions around 5 km/s—the UNM can occupy half or more of the volume. That result would mean two-phase descriptions of the interstellar medium miss a major reservoir of gas, and models of cooling, star formation, and feedback will have to treat the phase structure as continuously distributed.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on two mechanisms. The first is a turbulent-mixing model derived from the ideal MHD internal-energy equation: after Reynolds averaging and dropping third-order correlations, the steady-state balance becomes $\Gamma-\Lambda + c_v\kappa_T\,\nabla\cdot(\bar{\rho}\nabla\bar{T}) + c_v\kappa_\rho\,\nabla\cdot(\bar{T}\nabla\bar{\rho})=0$, with turbulent diffusivities $\kappa_T,\kappa_\rho\sim v_{\rm tur}l_{\rm tur}$; this is the term that smooths the phase diagram. The second is the critical-balance anisotropy of MHD turbulence, written locally as $l_\perp = L_{\rm inj}(l_\parallel/L_{\rm inj})^{3/2}M_A^2$, which makes the effective diffusion coefficient $\kappa\propto v_{\rm inj}l_\parallel(l_\parallel/L_{\rm inj})M_A^3$ smaller in strongly magnetized gas; the paper couples this to magnetic-pressure fluctuations that resist compression into the CNM. The simulations combine observed atomic cooling and photoelectric heating with solenoidal turbulence driving on a 100-pc grid to produce the phase diagrams, UNM fractions, and velocity structure functions analysed in the paper.

What would settle it

Repeat the same 100-pc turbulent simulation with thermal conduction switched on and compare UNM volume fractions; if the magnetized and turbulent runs without conduction are the only ones reaching about 50 percent UNM, the central attribution fails. A complementary observational check is to map the temperature distribution of neutral hydrogen over many sight lines with 21-cm absorption and emission pairs: the paper's claim predicts a broad, continuous population of gas at 200–5000 K occupying about half the volume, rather than a sharp two-phase boundary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the coexistence of WNM, UNM, and CNM is regulated dynamically by turbulence and magnetic fields, not set solely by thermal equilibrium. Turbulent mixing, modelled through a Reynolds decomposition of the energy equation with gradient-diffusion closures, adds diffusive temperature and density fluxes that balance net cooling, flattening the pressure-density phase diagram and increasing the mass in intermediate-temperature gas. Magnetic fields act in two opposing ways: MHD-turbulence anisotropy lowers the effective diffusion perpendicular to the field, making the phase diagram less flat, while magnetic pressure fluctuations add scatter and support against compression, sustaining the UNM. The paper reports that in magnetized runs with realistic $B\approx3$–$5\,\mu$G and $\sigma_v\approx5$ km s$^{-1}$, the UNM volume fraction reaches $\gtrsim50\%$, and that second-order velocity structure functions are shallower in MHD runs across all phases, indicating more small-scale fluctuations and a cascade closer to Kolmogorov scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that leaving thermal conduction out of the simulations does not change why the UNM survives; if conduction dominates the smoothing between warm and cold gas, the paper's attribution of the UNM to turbulence and magnetic fields would weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Higher turbulent velocity dispersion flattens the pressure-density phase diagram and raises the UNM fraction, so observed interstellar line widths should predict how much gas sits between the WNM and CNM.
  • Magnetic fields have a dual effect: they reduce turbulent mixing perpendicular to the field, making the phase curve steeper, while their pressure fluctuations support intermediate-temperature gas, so the UNM survives even when mixing is weaker.
  • Under realistic $B\approx3$–$5\,\mu$G and $\sigma_v\approx5$ km s$^{-1}$, the UNM volume fraction reaches $\gtrsim50\%$, making the unstable phase a major component of the interstellar medium rather than a thin boundary layer.
  • Velocity structure functions stay close to Kolmogorov 2/3 scaling in magnetized runs across WNM, UNM, and CNM, whereas hydrodynamic runs steepen toward Burgers-like slopes; the paper interprets this as magnetic suppression of shock dissipation and the driving of small-scale fluctuations.
  • Velocity gradients align preferentially perpendicular to the magnetic field in all phases, supporting observational techniques that use velocity gradients to trace magnetic field directions in multiphase gas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable follow-up is to rerun the same setup with thermal conduction enabled; the paper expects it to smooth the transition further, but the excluded term might also shift the UNM fraction away from the reported 50 percent once the numerical diffusion floor at roughly 10 cells is no longer doing part of the mixing work.
  • The critical-balance argument implies the mixing suppression should depend on the angle between the mean field and the turbulent driving geometry, not only on the Alfvén Mach number; varying that angle in simulations would be a sharp probe of the proposed mechanism.
  • If the $\gtrsim50\%$ UNM fraction holds in nature, two-phase ISM prescriptions used in galaxy-formation and star-formation models would need a third reservoir with its own cooling and mixing timescales, which could change how quickly warm gas cools toward star-forming densities.
  • The shallower structure-function slopes in magnetized runs suggest an observable: at a given Mach number, regions with stronger magnetic fields should show enhanced small-scale velocity fluctuations, a signature that could be searched for in HI spectral-line statistics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents 3D hydrodynamical and MHD simulations of a thermally bistable, turbulently driven atomic ISM, with a parameter sweep over velocity dispersion (sigma_v = 1.25, 2.50, 5.00 km/s) and magnetic field strength (B = 0, 3, 5 microgauss), summarized in Table 1. The core results are: turbulence flattens the pressure-density phase diagram and increases the fraction of gas in the 200-5000 K unstable neutral medium (UNM); magnetic fields make the phase diagram steeper and more scattered; velocity structure functions are shallower in MHD runs; and under what the authors call realistic conditions (sigma_v about 5 km/s, B about 3-5 microgauss) the UNM volume fraction reaches at least 50%. A short analytic section (Sec. 2) models turbulent mixing via gradient-diffusion closures with coefficients kappa_T and kappa_rho, and connects the anisotropy of MHD turbulence to a reduction of those coefficients.

Significance. If the central quantitative claim is robust, the paper would be a useful step toward understanding the UNM as dynamically maintained by turbulent mixing and magnetic pressure support rather than as a passive by-product of thermal instability. The parameter sweep and phase-resolved structure-function analysis are valuable, and the simulations use a standard, modern code (AthenaK). However, the headline UNM fraction currently rests on two unquantified modeling choices--excluded thermal conduction and a single grid resolution--and on what appears to be a single-time snapshot, so the significance is conditional on additional numerical verification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (12)] The simulations exclude thermal conduction and are run at a single 512^3 resolution with numerical dissipation at about 10 cells (~2 pc). In a thermally bistable gas the physical thickness of WNM-CNM interfaces is the Field length, which is controlled by conduction; with conduction absent, numerical diffusion is the only smoothing mechanism, and the simulated UNM fraction is resolution-dependent. The statement in Sec. 3 that including conduction would 'potentially increase' the UNM fraction is not quantified and is not obviously correct: if the physical Field length is smaller than the ~2 pc numerical diffusion scale, the simulated UNM fraction is instead an upper limit. Because the >=50% UNM claim in Sec. 4.3 and Sec. 5 depends directly on this, the manuscript needs a convergence study (at least two additional resolutions) and/or a conduction-included comparison before the central claim can be accepted.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Fig. 3] The UNM fractions are presented without time averaging or error bars; it is not stated whether they come from a single snapshot, and the text alternates between 'number density fraction' and 'volume fraction.' Since the driven system can fluctuate around saturation over the 100 Myr evolution, the quoted >=50% could be a statistical fluctuation. Please report time-averaged mass- and volume-weighted phase fractions with scatter over multiple snapshots, and state unambiguously which quantity is plotted.
  3. [Sec. 4.4-4.5, Figs. 4-6] The power-law slopes of the structure functions are described in words ('close to 2/3', 'shallower than 2/3', 'steeper than 1') with no fitting procedure, no fit range, and no uncertainties. The interpretation that magnetic fields 'drive additional small-scale fluctuations' and that phase transitions contribute to dissipation rests on these slope differences. Please provide fitted slopes with errors for all runs and phases, and justify the range over which each power law is fitted.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 4.4] The verb 'shallowens' is not standard English; consider 'shallows' or 'flattens.'
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption uses 'WNN' in the phrase 'structure function of velocity in WNN'; this should be 'WNM.'
  3. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption states 'B about 4 microgauss (top)', but Table 1 lists the two magnetic field strengths as 3 and 5 microgauss; the caption should be corrected to 3 microgauss.
  4. [Sec. 4.3] The sentence 'The histograms of gas temperature and number density under are shown in Fig. 3' has a missing phrase after 'under.'
  5. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (7)] The effective turbulent diffusion coefficients kappa_T and kappa_rho are never assigned values or compared with the simulation results; please state explicitly that the analytic section is illustrative and is not used to predict the phase fractions.
  6. [Sec. 4.1] The claim that density structures perpendicular to the magnetic field 'are most likely formed by shocks' is presented without shock identification or supporting diagnostics; please either support it or soften the wording.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central UNM-fraction result is measured from explicit 3D simulations and is not a fitted or self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The paper's main claim (turbulence and magnetic fields sustain the UNM, with UNM volume fraction ≥50% under realistic B≈3–5 µG and σv≈5 km/s) is a direct output of AthenaK simulations that include explicit heating/cooling (Eqs. 13–14) and no fitted turbulent-diffusion coefficients. The gradient-diffusion closure in Section 2 (Eq. 7) is presented as a heuristic 'theoretical consideration,' not as the evidence; κ_T and κ_ρ are never assigned values or tuned to reproduce the simulated phase fractions. The critical-balance scalings (Eqs. 8–11) are standard results cited from Goldreich & Sridhar 1995, Lazarian & Vishniac 1999, and others, and are not imported from the author's prior work as a uniqueness theorem. Self-citations such as Hu et al. 2024c for the turbulence-driving implementation are method-level references and do not carry the load of the scientific conclusion. The excluded thermal conduction and the possible role of numerical diffusion are physical-robustness concerns, not circularity: the derivation is not equivalent to its inputs by definition. No equation in the paper reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new particles or forces. Its central claim rests on standard MHD equations, a standard cooling and heating model, a chosen turbulence-driving parameter set, and a heuristic diffusion closure. The most fragile inputs are the thermal physics assumptions: without thermal conduction and with a fixed cooling function, the simulated UNM fraction could differ from real interstellar conditions.

free parameters (3)
  • Turbulent diffusion coefficients kappa_T, kappa_rho
    Introduced in Section 2.1 as gradient-diffusion closures for turbulent temperature and density fluxes. No values are specified, and the sign appears ambiguous between Eq. (6) and Eq. (7). They are not fitted to data.
  • Initial velocity dispersion sigma_v = 1.25, 2.50, 5.00 km/s
    Chosen by hand from Larson's law and prior observational constraints in Section 3, Table 1. These set the turbulence regime probed but are not fitted to the central result.
  • Initial magnetic field strength B = 3 and 5 microgauss
    Chosen from Zeeman measurements of Crutcher 2012. Treated as an input, not fitted to the UNM fraction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The ideal MHD equations with periodic boundary conditions and stochastic large-scale forcing adequately describe the multiphase ISM for the conclusions drawn.
    Section 3 states AthenaK solves the ideal MHD equations in a periodic box. This excludes self-gravity, cosmic rays, and galactic shear, which could alter phase fractions.
  • domain assumption The Koyama and Inutsuka (2002) atomic line cooling and constant photoelectric heating functions represent the thermal physics of the neutral ISM.
    Equations (13) and (14). The thermal equilibrium curve in Figure 2 is derived from these functions, and all phase fractions depend on them.
  • domain assumption Thermal conduction can be neglected without changing the qualitative role of turbulence and magnetic fields.
    Explicitly stated in Section 3: 'The thermal conduction term is excluded from the energy equation in order to isolate the effects of turbulence and magnetic fields.' The authors note conduction would smooth transitions further but do not quantify this.
  • ad hoc to paper Turbulent fluxes of temperature and density obey Fickian diffusion with coefficients kappa_T and kappa_rho.
    Equation (7). Third-order correlations are neglected, and no validation is provided for this closure in a compressible multiphase medium.
  • domain assumption The critical-balance scaling for MHD turbulence of Goldreich and Sridhar (1995) and Lazarian and Vishniac (1999) applies locally in the simulated multiphase gas.
    Equations (8) to (11). Used to argue that magnetic anisotropy reduces turbulent diffusion coefficients, a key part of the interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Origin of the Multi-Phase Interstellar Medium: the Effects of Turbulence and Magnetic Field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DJYJ7ZJA

@misc{pith2026250507423,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Origin of the Multi-Phase Interstellar Medium: the Effects of Turbulence and Magnetic Field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DJYJ7ZJA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07423}
}
read the original abstract

The interstellar medium (ISM) consists of a multiphase gas, including the warm neutral medium (WNM), the unstable neutral medium (UNM), and the cold neutral medium (CNM). While significant attention has been devoted to understanding the WNM and CNM, the formation of a substantial fraction of the UNM, with temperatures ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand Kelvin, remains less well understood. In this study, we present three-dimensional hydrodynamical and magnetohydrodynamical simulations of turbulent multiphase ISM to investigate the roles of turbulence and magnetic fields in regulating the multiphase ISM. Our results confirm that turbulence is crucial in redistributing energy and producing the UNM. The turbulent mixing effect smooths the phase diagram, flattens the pressure-density relationship, and increases the fraction of gas in the UNM. We find that magnetic fields not only contribute to sustaining the UNM but also influence the dynamics and distribution of gas across all phases. Magnetic fields introduce anisotropy to the turbulent cascade, reducing the efficiency of turbulent mixing in the direction perpendicular to the magnetic field. We find the anisotropy results in a less flat phase diagram compared to hydrodynamical cases. Furthermore, the inclusion of magnetic fields shallowens the second-order velocity structure functions across multiple ISM phases, suggesting that more small-scale fluctuations are driven. These fluctuations contribute to the formation of the UNM by altering the energy cascade and thermodynamic properties of the gas. Our findings suggest that the combined effects of turbulence and magnetic fields are important in regulating the multiphase ISM.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.07423 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Slices of number density (top panel), velocity (middle panel), and temperature (bottom panel). Three different physical conditions are included: hydrodynamic cubes with σv ≈ 1.25 km s−1 (left panel), hydrodynamic cubes with σv ≈ 2.50 km s−1 (central panel), and MHD cubes with σv ≈ 2.50 km s−1 (right panel). For the MHD case, the mean magnetic field is vertical. ∂ρ ∂t + ∇ · (ρv) = 0, ∂(ρv) ∂t + ∇ ·  ρvvT +  c 2 sρ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phase diagrams of gas density and pressure. The black dashed line represents the thermal equilibrium obtained from Γ = Λ, where Γ and Λ are the heating and cooling functions, respectively. Three different magnetic field conditions: B = 0 (hydro), ≈ 3, and ≈ 5 µG, as well as three turbulence conditions: σv ≈ 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 km s−1 are included [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Histograms of gas temperature (top) and number density (bottom). For comparison, three different magnetic field conditions: B = 0 (hydro), ≈ 3, and ≈ 5 µG, as well as three turbulence conditions: σv ≈ 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 km s−1 are included [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The undecomposed structure function of velocity. The structure function is calculated for three different magnetic field conditions: B = 0 (hydro), ≈ 3, and ≈ 5 µG, as well as three turbulence conditions: σv ≈ 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 km s−1 . To guide the eye, the dashed …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The parallel and perpendicular components of the decomposed velocity structure function. The decomposition is performed with respect to the local magnetic field. The structure function is calculated for three turbulence conditions: σv ≈ 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 km s−1 . To…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The structure function of velocity in WNN (i.e., T > 5000 K), UNM (200K < T < 5000 K), and CNM (T < 200 K). The structure function is calculated for three different magnetic field conditions: B = 0 (hydro), ≈ 3, and ≈ 5 µG, as well as three turbulence conditions: σv ≈ …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Histograms of the relative angle between ∇v and B un￾der two magnetic field conditions: B ≈ 4 µG (top) and ≈ 5 µG (bottom), as well as three turbulence conditions: σv ≈ 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 km s−1 . ∇v is calculated at cell-scale ∼ 0.2 pc. sitions or thermal condensati…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamics of Multiphase Carbon in the Turbulent Circumgalactic Medium

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Turbulence determines where carbon ions sit in simulated galaxy halos, while background ultraviolet radiation sets the overall ionization balance, boosting C II and C IV.

  2. Characterizing 3D Magnetic Fields and Turbulence in H I Clouds

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A neural network maps H I spectral cubes to 3D magnetic field orientation, strength, sonic and Alfven Mach numbers, and it is applied to two FAST-survey clouds in Monoceros.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    W., Rickett, B

    Armstrong, J. W., Rickett, B. J., & Spangler, S. R. 1995, ApJ, 443, 209, doi: 10.1086/175515

    doi:10.1086/175515 1995

  2. [2]

    R., Federrath, C., & Seta, A

    Beattie, J. R., Federrath, C., & Seta, A. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 1593, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2257

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2257 2020

  3. [3]

    C., & Fabian, A

    Begelman, M. C., & Fabian, A. C. 1990, MNRAS, 244, 26P

    1990

  4. [4]

    2010, ApJ, 710, 853, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/853

    Chepurnov, A., & Lazarian, A. 2010, ApJ, 710, 853, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/853

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/710/1/853 2010

  5. [5]

    2003, MNRAS, 345, 325, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06941.x

    Cho, J., & Lazarian, A. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 325, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06941.x

    arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    2003, ApJL, 589, L77, doi: 10.1086/376492

    Cho, J., Lazarian, A., Honein, A., et al. 2003, ApJL, 589, L77, doi: 10.1086/376492

    work page doi:10.1086/376492 2003

  7. [7]

    Cho, J., & Vishniac, E. T. 2000, ApJ, 539, 273, doi: 10.1086/309213

    doi:10.1086/309213 2000

  8. [8]

    Choi, E., & Stone, J. M. 2012, ApJ, 747, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/86

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/2/86 2012

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.03305

    Colman, T., Hennebelle, P., Brucy, N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.03305. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03305

    2025

  2. [10]

    Crutcher, R. M. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 29, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  4. [12]

    A., et al

    Duan, D., He, J., Bowen, T. A., et al. 2021, ApJL, 915, L8

    2021

  5. [13]

    S., Iapichino, L., & Beattie, J

    Federrath, C., Klessen, R. S., Iapichino, L., & Beattie, J. R. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 365, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-01282-z

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Field, G. B. 1965, ApJ, 142, 531, doi: 10.1086/148317

    1965 doi

  7. [15]

    B., Ostriker, E

    Fielding, D. B., Ostriker, E. C., Bryan, G. L., & Jermyn, A. S. 2020, ApJL, 894, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8d2c

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    B., Ripperda, B., & Philippov, A

    Fielding, D. B., Ripperda, B., & Philippov, A. A. 2023, ApJL, 949, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/accf1f

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    J., & Scalo, J

    Gazol, A., V´azquez-Semadeni, E., S´anchez-Salcedo, F. J., & Scalo, J. 2001, ApJL, 557, L121, doi: 10.1086/322873

    2001 doi

  10. [18]

    1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    Goldreich, P., & Sridhar, S. 1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    1995 doi

  11. [19]

    J., & Scannapieco, E

    Gray, W. J., & Scannapieco, E. 2017, ApJ, 849, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9121

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    2022, ApJ, 934, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac76bf

    Ha, T., Li, Y ., Kounkel, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac76bf

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol

    Ha, T., Li, Y ., Kounkel, M., et al. 2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 241, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 228.01

    2023

  14. [22]

    1989, ApJ, 336, 808, doi: 10.1086/167051

    Heiles, C. 1989, ApJ, 336, 808, doi: 10.1086/167051

    1989 doi

  15. [23]

    2005, in Cosmic Magnetic Fields, ed

    Heiles, C., & Crutcher, R. 2005, in Cosmic Magnetic Fields, ed. R. Wielebinski & R. Beck, V ol. 664, 137, doi: 10.1007/3540313966 7

    2005 doi

  16. [24]

    S., & Audit, E

    Hennebelle, P., Banerjee, R., V´azquez-Semadeni, E., Klessen, R. S., & Audit, E. 2008, A&A, 486, L43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810165

    2008 doi

  17. [25]

    W., Yuen, K

    Ho, K. W., Yuen, K. H., & Lazarian, A. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 230, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad481 —. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14199, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14199

    2023 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hu, Y ., Lazarian, A., Alina, D., Pogosyan, D., & Ho, K. W. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2994, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1924

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2024a, MNRAS, 527, 11240, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3766

    Hu, Y ., Lazarian, A., Wu, Y ., & Fu, C. 2024a, MNRAS, 527, 11240, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3766

    doi

  20. [28]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.08157, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.08157

    Hu, Y ., Whittingham, J., Lazarian, A., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.08157, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.08157

    doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    M., & Lazarian, A

    Hu, Y ., Xu, S., Arzamasskiy, L., Stone, J. M., & Lazarian, A. 2024c, MNRAS, 527, 3945, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3493 12

    doi

  22. [30]

    2021a, ApJ, 911, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abea18 —

    Hu, Y ., Xu, S., & Lazarian, A. 2021a, ApJ, 911, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abea18 —. 2021b, ApJ, 911, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abea18

    doi

  23. [31]

    H., & Lazarian, A

    Hu, Y ., Yuen, K. H., & Lazarian, A. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1333, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1807 —. 2020, ApJ, 888, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab60a5

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    H., Lazarian, V ., et al

    Hu, Y ., Yuen, K. H., Lazarian, V ., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 776, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0769-0

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Iroshnikov, P. S. 1964, Soviet Ast., 7, 566

    1964

  26. [34]

    P., & Masterson, P

    Ji, S., Oh, S. P., & Masterson, P. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 737, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1248

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    2010, ApJ, 720, 742, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/742

    Kowal, G., & Lazarian, A. 2010, ApJ, 720, 742, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/742

    2010 doi

  28. [36]

    2002, ApJL, 564, L97, doi: 10.1086/338978 —

    Koyama, H., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2002, ApJL, 564, L97, doi: 10.1086/338978 —. 2004, ApJL, 602, L25, doi: 10.1086/382478

    2002 doi

  29. [37]

    Kraichnan, R. H. 1965, Physics of Fluids, 8, 1385, doi: 10.1063/1.1761412

    1965 doi

  30. [38]

    M., Reynolds, R

    Lagache, G., Haffner, L. M., Reynolds, R. J., & Tufte, S. L. 2000, A&A, 354, 247, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9911355

    2000 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Larson, R. B. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 809, doi: 10.1093/mnras/194.4.809

    1981 doi

  32. [40]

    2000, ApJ, 537, 720, doi: 10.1086/309040

    Lazarian, A., & Pogosyan, D. 2000, ApJ, 537, 720, doi: 10.1086/309040

    2000 doi

  33. [41]

    Lazarian, A., & Vishniac, E. T. 1999, ApJ, 517, 700, doi: 10.1086/307233

    1999 doi

  34. [42]

    Lazarian, A., & Yuen, K. H. 2018, ApJ, 853, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa241

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    Lehner, N., & Howk, J. C. 2011, Science, 334, 955, doi: 10.1126/science.1209069

    2011 doi

  36. [44]

    2001, ApJ, 562, 279, doi: 10.1086/323470

    Lithwick, Y ., & Goldreich, P. 2001, ApJ, 562, 279, doi: 10.1086/323470

    2001 doi

  37. [45]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 4952, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3783

    Liu, M., Hu, Y ., & Lazarian, A. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 4952, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3783

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    2001, ApJ, 554, 1175, doi: 10.1086/321413

    Maron, J., & Goldreich, P. 2001, ApJ, 554, 1175, doi: 10.1086/321413

    2001 doi

  39. [47]

    2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 83

    Matteini, L., Franci, L., Alexandrova, O., et al. 2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 83

    2020

  40. [48]

    F., & Ostriker, J

    McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. 1977, ApJ, 218, 148, doi: 10.1086/155667

    1977 doi

  41. [49]

    R., Draine, B

    Moseley, E. R., Draine, B. T., Tomida, K., & Stone, J. M. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 3290, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3384

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    E., Peek, J

    Putman, M. E., Peek, J. E. G., & Joung, M. R. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 491, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125612

    2012 doi

  43. [51]

    J., Kulkarni, S

    Rand, R. J., Kulkarni, S. R., & Hester, J. J. 1990, ApJL, 352, L1, doi: 10.1086/185679

    1990 doi

  44. [52]

    2008, A&A Rv, 15, 189, doi: 10.1007/s00159-008-0010-0

    Sancisi, R., Fraternali, F., Oosterloo, T., & van der Hulst, T. 2008, A&A Rv, 15, 189, doi: 10.1007/s00159-008-0010-0

    2008 doi

  45. [53]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1400

    Seta, A., & Federrath, C. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1400

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Snowden, S. L. 1999, MNRAS, 302, 417, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02013.x

    1999

  47. [55]

    M., Mullen, P

    Stone, J. M., Mullen, P. D., Fielding, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16053, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16053

    2024 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240 Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. 2009, Python 3 Reference Manual (Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace) V´azquez-Semadeni, E., Gazol, A., & Scalo, J. 2000, ApJ, 540, 271, doi: 1...

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    2016, ApJ, 816, 15, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/15

    Wang, X., Tu, C., Marsch, E., He, J., & Wang, L. 2016, ApJ, 816, 15, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/15

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    G., Hollenbach, D., McKee, C

    Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D., McKee, C. F., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Bakes, E. L. O. 1995, ApJ, 443, 152, doi: 10.1086/175510

    1995 doi

  51. [59]

    G., McKee, C

    Wolfire, M. G., McKee, C. F., Hollenbach, D., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2003, ApJ, 587, 278, doi: 10.1086/368016

    2003 doi

  52. [60]

    2019, Study on Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence and Its Astrophysical Applications, Springer Theses (Springer Nature Singapore)

    Xu, S. 2019, Study on Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence and Its Astrophysical Applications, Springer Theses (Springer Nature Singapore). https://books.google.com/books?id=oXWUDwAAQBAJ

    2019

  53. [61]

    2021, ApJ, 910, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe403

    Xu, S., & Hu, Y . 2021, ApJ, 910, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe403

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    2019, ApJ, 878, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21be

    Xu, S., Ji, S., & Lazarian, A. 2019, ApJ, 878, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21be

    2019 doi

  55. [63]

    H., Ho, K

    Yuen, K. H., Ho, K. W., Law, C. Y ., & Chen, A. 2024, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics, 8, 21, doi: 10.1007/s41614-024-00156-5

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    H., & Lazarian, A

    Yuen, K. H., & Lazarian, A. 2017, ApJL, 837, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa6255

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    Z., Yuen, K

    Zhao, S., Yan, H., Liu, T. Z., Yuen, K. H., & Shi, M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.12507, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.12507

    2023 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.