Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cite Before You Speak: Enhancing Context-Response Grounding in E-commerce Conversational LLM-Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04830 v3 pith:DPKB7OYG submitted 2025-03-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords conversationalcustomersgroundingattributionchallengescitationcustomerexperience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advancement of conversational large language models (LLMs), several LLM-based Conversational Shopping Agents (CSA) have been developed to help customers smooth their online shopping. The primary objective in building an engaging and trustworthy CSA is to ensure the agent's responses about product factoids are accurate and factually grounded. However, two challenges remain. First, LLMs produce hallucinated or unsupported claims. Such inaccuracies risk spreading misinformation and diminishing customer trust. Second, without providing knowledge source attribution in CSA response, customers struggle to verify LLM-generated information. To address both challenges, we present an easily productionized solution that enables a ''citation experience'' to our customers. We build auto-evaluation metrics to holistically evaluate LLM's grounding and attribution capabilities, suggesting that citation generation paradigm substantially improves grounding performance by 13.83%. To deploy this capability at scale, we introduce Multi-UX-Inference system, which appends source citations to LLM outputs while preserving existing user experience features and supporting scalable inference. Large-scale online A/B tests show that grounded CSA responses improves customer engagement by 3% - 10%, depending on UX variations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Similarity = Value? Consultation Value Assessment and Alignment for Personalized Search

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VAPS outperforms semantic-similarity-only consultation alignment by scoring consultations with time decay, scenario scope, and posterior user actions and aligning them with actions via cross-attention.

Pith tools