REVIEW 1 cited by
A Comparative Study of Continuous Sign Language Recognition Techniques
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Continuous Sign Language Recognition (CSLR) focuses on the interpretation of a sequence of sign language gestures performed continually without pauses. In this study, we conduct an empirical evaluation of recent deep learning CSLR techniques and assess their performance across various datasets and sign languages. The models selected for analysis implement a range of approaches for extracting meaningful features and employ distinct training strategies. To determine their efficacy in modeling different sign languages, these models were evaluated using multiple datasets, specifically RWTH-PHOENIX-Weather-2014, ArabSign, and GrSL, each representing a unique sign language. The performance of the models was further tested with unseen signers and sentences. The conducted experiments establish new benchmarks on the selected datasets and provide valuable insights into the robustness and generalization of the evaluated techniques under challenging scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Developing Lightweight DNN Models With Limited Data For Real-Time Sign Language Recognition
A 7.2 MB branched DNN, fed with MediaPipe landmarks encoded as 947 ASL parameter features, classifies 343 isolated American Sign Language signs with 92% video-level accuracy and sub-10 ms latency on edge devices.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.