Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluating Large Language Model Applications in the Medical Industry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.15777 v4 pith:DW6UURGY submitted 2024-04-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords medicalcomprehensiveevaluationllmsapplicationsbenchmarksdatainformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since the inception of the Transformer architecture in 2017, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT and BERT have evolved significantly, impacting various industries with their advanced capabilities in language understanding and generation. These models have shown potential to transform the medical field, highlighting the necessity for specialized evaluation frameworks to ensure their effective and ethical deployment. This comprehensive survey delineates the extensive application and requisite evaluation of LLMs within healthcare, emphasizing the critical need for empirical validation to fully exploit their capabilities in enhancing healthcare outcomes. Our survey is structured to provide an in-depth analysis of LLM applications across clinical settings, medical text data processing, research, education, and public health awareness. We begin by exploring the roles of LLMs in various medical applications, detailing their evaluation based on performance in tasks such as clinical diagnosis, medical text data processing, information retrieval, data analysis, and educational content generation. The subsequent sections offer a comprehensive discussion on the evaluation methods and metrics employed, including models, evaluators, and comparative experiments. We further examine the benchmarks and datasets utilized in these evaluations, providing a categorized description of benchmarks for tasks like question answering, summarization, information extraction, bioinformatics, information retrieval and general comprehensive benchmarks. This structure ensures a thorough understanding of how LLMs are assessed for their effectiveness, accuracy, usability, and ethical alignment in the medical domain. ...

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Every Sample Counts: Supervised Fine-Tuning of Language Models with Pointwise Constraints

    eess.SP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pointwise constrained fine-tuning via sample-wise augmented Lagrangians and learned relaxations reduces tail constraint violations across safety, tool-calling, and re-ranking while preserving average task performance.

  2. A French OSCE Dialogue Dataset and Controllable Virtual Patient System for Clinical Training

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Introduces a French OSCE dialogue dataset of 240 interactions and a modular LLM-based controllable virtual patient generation system with multi-level LLM-as-Judge evaluation for clinical skills training.

  3. UniReason-Med: A Shared Grounded Reasoning Interface for 2D-to-3D Transfer in Medical VQA

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    UniReason-Med introduces a unified framework for 2D and 3D medical VQA with shared grounded reasoning, trained on a 220K dataset, claiming that joint 2D+3D supervision improves 3D performance over 3D-only training.

Pith tools