Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fairness-Aware Client Selection for Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10738 v1 pith:E6K3ULYS submitted 2023-07-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.DC
keywords clientsclientperformanceselectionenhancingfederatedlearningproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated learning (FL) has enabled multiple data owners (a.k.a. FL clients) to train machine learning models collaboratively without revealing private data. Since the FL server can only engage a limited number of clients in each training round, FL client selection has become an important research problem. Existing approaches generally focus on either enhancing FL model performance or enhancing the fair treatment of FL clients. The problem of balancing performance and fairness considerations when selecting FL clients remains open. To address this problem, we propose the Fairness-aware Federated Client Selection (FairFedCS) approach. Based on Lyapunov optimization, it dynamically adjusts FL clients' selection probabilities by jointly considering their reputations, times of participation in FL tasks and contributions to the resulting model performance. By not using threshold-based reputation filtering, it provides FL clients with opportunities to redeem their reputations after a perceived poor performance, thereby further enhancing fair client treatment. Extensive experiments based on real-world multimedia datasets show that FairFedCS achieves 19.6% higher fairness and 0.73% higher test accuracy on average than the best-performing state-of-the-art approach.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Assessing the Impacts of Imperfect Datasets on Client Selections in Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Federated learning client quality can be scored by testing each client's model on the server's own data, and selection fairness should be dialed down when quality scores vary widely.

Pith tools