Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

LSTPrompt: Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasters by Long-Short-Term Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.16132 v1 pith:EBDIN57O submitted 2024-02-25 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords lstpromptpromptingforecastinglanguagellmsmodelszero-shotexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time-series forecasting (TSF) finds broad applications in real-world scenarios. Prompting off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrates strong zero-shot TSF capabilities while preserving computational efficiency. However, existing prompting methods oversimplify TSF as language next-token predictions, overlooking its dynamic nature and lack of integration with state-of-the-art prompt strategies such as Chain-of-Thought. Thus, we propose LSTPrompt, a novel approach for prompting LLMs in zero-shot TSF tasks. LSTPrompt decomposes TSF into short-term and long-term forecasting sub-tasks, tailoring prompts to each. LSTPrompt guides LLMs to regularly reassess forecasting mechanisms to enhance adaptability. Extensive evaluations demonstrate consistently better performance of LSTPrompt than existing prompting methods, and competitive results compared to foundation TSF models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time Series Forecasting as Reasoning: A Slow-Thinking Approach with Reinforced LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Time-R1 trains LLMs via supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning with a time-series-specific reward and non-uniform GRIP sampling to enable multi-step reasoning that improves forecasting accuracy.

  2. CoGenCast: A Coupled Autoregressive-Flow Generative Framework for Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CoGenCast couples a Qwen-based encoder-decoder with flow matching and reports strong MSE/MAE on ten time-series benchmarks.

  3. MemCast: Memory-Driven Time Series Forecasting with Experience-Conditioned Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    MemCast claims LLM time-series forecasting improves when retrieval from a hierarchical memory of patterns, wisdom, and laws conditions reasoning, but the reported gains depend on a test-label-rewarded confidence update.

  4. BALM-TSF: Balanced Multimodal Alignment for LLM-Based Time Series Forecasting

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BALM-TSF combines a statistical-prompt text branch with a patch-based time series branch, using scaling plus contrastive alignment to balance the two modalities, improving long-term and few-shot forecasting on five of...

  5. Forecasting Clicks in Digital Advertising: Multimodal Inputs and Interpretable Outputs

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding RL-fine-tuned LLM summaries of campaign change logs to a numeric click forecaster improves MAE and RMSE on two held-out ad campaigns and produces interpretable reasoning.

  6. Teaching Time Series to See and Speak: Forecasting with Aligned Visual and Textual Perspectives

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    TimesCLIP aligns image-based and text-based views of the same time series via contrastive learning to improve forecasting accuracy on several benchmarks, but the full multimodal model is not used on two of the six lon...

  7. A Survey of AIOps in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic survey that categorizes LLM-based AIOps research into four dimensions: data sources, tasks, methods, and evaluation, claiming to be the first comprehensive such overview.

Pith tools