ReXErr: Synthesizing Clinically Meaningful Errors in Diagnostic Radiology Reports
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:EFSCIJVDrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Accurately interpreting medical images and writing radiology reports is a critical but challenging task in healthcare. Both human-written and AI-generated reports can contain errors, ranging from clinical inaccuracies to linguistic mistakes. To address this, we introduce ReXErr, a methodology that leverages Large Language Models to generate representative errors within chest X-ray reports. Working with board-certified radiologists, we developed error categories that capture common mistakes in both human and AI-generated reports. Our approach uses a novel sampling scheme to inject diverse errors while maintaining clinical plausibility. ReXErr demonstrates consistency across error categories and produces errors that closely mimic those found in real-world scenarios. This method has the potential to aid in the development and evaluation of report correction algorithms, potentially enhancing the quality and reliability of radiology reporting.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
RadOT-Eval: Auditable Structured-Evidence Transport for Radiology Report Evaluation
RadOT-Eval is an optimal-transport framework that aligns attribute-structured evidence units between radiology reports and predicts human-annotated error burden with higher Spearman correlations than standard metrics ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.